"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." — The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
This site (http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=3924) says the following:
The First Amendment prohibits government from establishing a religion and protects each person's right to practice (or not practice) any faith without government interference.
What are your thoughts on this?? The constitution has nothing in it that has the words "separation of Church and State" BUT Jefforson's intent, according to a letter he wrote, was this separation. I don't know all the facts, just what I've searched on the net just now, so feel free to correct me with sources if you wish. :)
My roommate told me that SHE feels that since the majority of people in the united States are either Jewish or Christian, that all laws and practices of the government should be based upon Jewish and Christian principles. I think that the United States was set up so we could practice ANY religion we want, and that the government should reflect that. After all, it says up there "shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"
Well, from what I see, the only religions that are actually being suppressed in schools and other government places, are Christian ones. Anyone else is given all these considerations and crap, "freedom of religion", but they don't even call it Christmas break any more. Now they have to call it Winter break. (Can't insult anyone ELSE, only the Christians.) The only ones who are discriminated against are the Christians. I say either everybody, or nobody. THAT would be fair.
It seems the reason the courts have interpreted the "wall of separation" was to prevent EXACTLY what your friend wants to do. She can say that we should base it on "Christian" or "Jewish" principles, but, what are those? There, of course, is much disagreement about that because there are many interpretation of what Christianity means. The precedent doesn't just protect atheists from Christians, it protects Christians from themselves. You're right, the Constitution never mentions separation of church and state. Through years of precedents that interpretation of the implicit meaning has been established. The Constituion is a living document, subject to interpretation by the justices. These precedents are what matter.
PS. I'm sure calling it Winter Break really destroys the rights of Christians to practice their religion. Those poor persecuted people. Plus that argument assumes that Atheism is a religion. Since it doesn't have a "canon" one would be hard-pressed to make that argument. If you wanted a good example, you could have at least brought up having Bible study in classrooms...
catwmSomewhere in the middle, Florida USA6,683 posts
The first admendment protects many things:
They have to do with freedom of speech and press - free exchange of ideas ( this could be religious in nature ) Freedom of assembly and right to petition government - ( this could represent a group of people picketing or protesting for religious purposes ). It protects the right to associate - ( the government can not force anyone to join a group of religious origin )
This admendment allows a person to hold whatever religious beliefs that they want and to exercise that belief by attending religious services, praying in public or in private, proselytizing or wearing religious clothing. The free exercise clause is also the right NOT to believe in any religion and the right NOT to participate in those activities.
The establishment clause prevents the government from creating a church, endorsing religion in general, or favoring one set of religious beliefs over another.
Makes me wonder how globalism entered into the picture.
Yes, they do. Schools were started way back when this was basically a "christian nation". Years later her comes Political Correctness, or my preferred definition of PC, pathetic crap. And they didn't just change the name from Christmas break to Winter break, they changed everything that goes along with it. When I was a kid we had the Christmas pageant, the Christmas play, the Christmas parties...all no longer allowed. As far as school being called on holidays for other religions, they just stay home and it is considered an "excused absense".
Off topic: as to your two recent emails, I don't have the first clue to what it is you're referring, but I'm sure not going to waste my time trying to figure it out. Have a nice day.
My only concern is..the crack pots that hide under the cloak of a religion, but nothing could be further from the truth. In Canada their are a lot of Catholic priests shaking in their boots these days. Church and state have to be separate, no matter what the religion is period.
I think they should just call it what it is and that is commercialism. Why not just call it Commercialism Day and be done with it. Why have it cloaked like what has already been mentioned? This is a Capitalist government. Why be ashamed of it?
IrishLass Just to clarify... The inmates are all allowed their various religious practices, but you aren't even allowed to have a bible? IF I read that correctly, may I ask what the reason for that is?
The separation of church and state is EXTREMELY important. If you want examples of where it creates problems, look at some of the Middle-Eastern countries where religious leaders push for the anihilation of "non-believers". In the 1700's, the Church of England punished anyone who didn't believe the way they did. Many other countries were the same. I happen to believe in God, but I'm not going to tell anyone else how or what they should believe, and the government certainly should not do so, either.
i will be honest and say i agree with you. laws should not be based on a religon. they should be based on what is right and wrong. in my i feel that religon should be sepret from laws because what one person feels might not be the same as a nother. also when you look at it even basing things on a christion stand point, there are to manny to go on. i mean how manny diffrent religons fall under just christion, to manny.
when you look at it one of the reasons the pilgrams came over here was so they could have there owne fath and belive in what they wanted to. not what the curch of england forced them to follow.
"shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;" The government has already made a lot of laws prohibiting christians from their traditional "exercise thereof". As the prison guard said, they aren't allowed to kill animals for their "worship", she isn't allowed to carry a bible, and no, kids aren't allowed to have Christmas/Easter anything in schools, during the last holiday nativity scenes were banned and even a peace wreath was protested against. Seems to be a lot of prohibition going on. As far as just making the laws according to what is right and what is wrong, how do you do that when some of these religions are going to claim that their animal sacrifices are part of their worship, but most people think it is disgusting and barbaric? And just how far does it go when all these bizarre fringe religions are added in? Is scientology a real religion, is worshiping fairies and trolls a real religion...?
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Something I'm wondering about....
The first amendment says:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
— The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
This site (http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=3924) says the following:
The First Amendment prohibits government from establishing a religion and protects each person's right to practice (or not practice) any faith without government interference.
What are your thoughts on this?? The constitution has nothing in it that has the words "separation of Church and State" BUT Jefforson's intent, according to a letter he wrote, was this separation. I don't know all the facts, just what I've searched on the net just now, so feel free to correct me with sources if you wish. :)
My roommate told me that SHE feels that since the majority of people in the united States are either Jewish or Christian, that all laws and practices of the government should be based upon Jewish and Christian principles. I think that the United States was set up so we could practice ANY religion we want, and that the government should reflect that. After all, it says up there "shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"
What are your thoughts??