killing a unborn child,, wrong or right (42)
online today!online today!pedro27Bray, Dublin Ireland5,970 Threads 223 Polls 33,240 Postswrong or right
pedro27: wrong or right
You cant be serious. Its not a school night...cant you go back to the aul wans Wants and Needs?
Fraya: You cant be serious. Its not a school night...cant you go back to the aul wans Wants and Needs?
mature means 'a 20-40 woman, answer the qusetion
pedro27: mature means 'a 20-40 woman, answer the qusetion
I'm extra mature then, like a really smelly cheese
Nah man, I dont get involved in the heavy stuff. I'll leave you to it.
Fraya: I'm extra mature then, like a really smelly cheese
Nah man, I dont get involved in the heavy stuff. I'll leave you to it.
Nah man, I dont get involved in the heavy stuff. I'll leave you to it.
Ah Mme Camembert you look delicious tonight. Would you like to spread yourself on a cracker ?
pedro27: wrong or right
Thats a very black and white thing to say..there is no wrong or right..It all depends on the circumstance
pedro27: wrong or right
that would be an ecumenical matter WESTERNSTAR1: that would be an ecumenical matter
If everything was an ecumenical matter we'd all be standing in line like good little girls and boys waiting to told how to think
Fraya: If everything was an ecumenical matter we'd all be standing in line like good little girls and boys waiting to told how to think
'if' I was a sailor I would sail you out to sea !
Like many things in this life, any point of view is based on where you are standing to look at it from.
WESTERNSTAR1: 'if' I was a sailor I would sail you out to sea !
Then what would you do? Throw me over board?
I'd pull you in with me MarsMan: Like many things in this life, any point of view is based on where you are standing to look at it from.
and yet more common sense...Not regulation issue soldier, off with your head
Fraya: Then what would you do? Throw me over board? I'd pull you in with me
no,i wouldn't do that ! I would order you to jump overboard and if u refused well that would be mutiny and for that u'd walk the plank ! so either way your going 2 get wet 
pedro27: wrong or right
, well i think if a woman wants to do this why would she need help from some paper work ? and then there's the costs , she would be better off having the child and then cutting its throat herself instead of getting someone else to do it , i suppose in a perfect world she would let the kid became old enough so she could explain to it why it must be put to deat,pedro27: wrong or right
wrong. Murderers. Depends......
It could be the spawn of Satan.
It could be the spawn of Satan.
Wrong
Some people say that a fetus has no rights over the woman carrying it because it is a parasite ("just a clump of cells that cannot live outside of it's host"). But the parents actively gave life to it without it's consent so it's not a parasite. The mother especially, because of the range of birth control available, cannot say, except in the most exceptional of circumstances, that a parasite trespassed into her body.
Some argue that since the 'clump of cells' as they call the foetus is not sentient until a certain stage of late development, that it is not a person and therefore does not deserve the innate natural right to not be aggressed against, i.e. not to be killed by violence. But if the right not to be aggressed against depended on sentience then how could we argue for animal rights or for the rights of those who lack sentience due to some condition like autism? Clearly the sentience argument does not hold unless they also agree that all 'untermensch' should be murdered, if they are of an inconvenience.
So is that it? Are healthy foetuses just the thin end of the wedge the State has planned? Will it be the mentally and physically challenged next? Then the elderly? Then those who are 'not producing enough' as George Bernard Shaw demanded?
Some argue that since the 'clump of cells' as they call the foetus is not sentient until a certain stage of late development, that it is not a person and therefore does not deserve the innate natural right to not be aggressed against, i.e. not to be killed by violence. But if the right not to be aggressed against depended on sentience then how could we argue for animal rights or for the rights of those who lack sentience due to some condition like autism? Clearly the sentience argument does not hold unless they also agree that all 'untermensch' should be murdered, if they are of an inconvenience.
So is that it? Are healthy foetuses just the thin end of the wedge the State has planned? Will it be the mentally and physically challenged next? Then the elderly? Then those who are 'not producing enough' as George Bernard Shaw demanded?
pedro27: wrong or right
wrong...
facetowardsfront: But if the right not to be aggressed against depended on sentience then how could we argue for animal rights or for the rights of those who lack sentience due to some condition like autism? Clearly the sentience argument does not hold unless they also agree that all 'untermensch' should be murdered, if they are of an inconvenience.
Yep. I've used that counter argument before... specifically as it applied to people who are in a near vegetative state after an accident. Do their human rights vanish just because of their loss of concious thought? No they most certainly don't.
More Threads
makeover
Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
Who will be The Last Person To Post... VERSION FOUR
beauty of the heart
your favorite topic?
Are the ads on here as phony as some of the profiles?
Kultur-multur
What happened to CS while i was away.. (Long time)
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
4,062 Views
41 Comments
Created: Jul 2013
Last Viewed: Apr 21
Last Commented: Jul 2013
0 Likes
Related Forums
- makeover
- Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
- More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
- Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
- Who will be The Last Person To Post... VERSION FOUR
- beauty of the heart
- your favorite topic?
- Are the ads on here as phony as some of the profiles?
- Kultur-multur
- What happened to CS while i was away.. (Long time)