Obama using silver bullet to destroy jobs along with the rest of us over the next two years just asking for a GOP president . Be a few Domo's playing with slide rules today , their fat little fingers up in the wind to see which ways winds blowing . Nothing like the though of future unemployment to sharpen their minds .
One votes blindly for the other party not because there's any reason to hope it will be any better, but out of total disgust for the party that's been in power.
I agree with you and that's happening in many places, the province of Québec being one.
Thanks to all of you ladies and gents for your sharp political comments, and for those of you who have concerns about the proper usages (as you know it to mean) of the phrase coup d'etat, here's something you may find interesting.
A coup d'état(/?ku?de?'t??/; French: blow of state; plural: coups d'état), also known as a coup, a putsch, or an overthrow, is the sudden and illegal seizure of a government, usually instigated by a small group of the existing state establishment to depose the established government and replace it with a new ruling body. A coup d'état is considered successful when the usurpers establish their dominance. When the coup either fails or doesn't entirely succeed, a civil war is a possible consequence.
A coup d'état typically uses the extant government's power to assume political control of the country. In Coup d'État: A Practical Handbook[page needed], military historian Edward Luttwak states that " coup consists of the infiltration of a small, but critical, segment of the state apparatus, which is then used to displace the government from its control of the remainder." The armed forces, whether military or paramilitary, can be a defining factor of a coup d'état.
Usage of the phrase Coup D'etat Politically, a coup d'état is a usually violent method of political engineering, which affects who rules in the government, without radical changes in the form of the government, the political system.
Tactically, a coup d'état involves control, by an active minority of usurpers, who block the remaining (non-participant) defenders of the state's possible defence of the attacked government, by either capturing or expelling the politico-military leaders, and seizing physical control of the country's key government offices, communications media, and infrastructure. It is to be noted that in the latest years there has been a broad use of the phrase in mass media, which may contradict the legal definition of "coup d'état". In looser usage (as in intelligence coup, boardroom coup) the term simply refers to gaining a sudden advantage on a rival.
Thanks to all of you ladies and gents for your sharp political comments, and for those of you who have concerns about the proper usages (as you know it to mean) of the phrase coup d'etat, here's something you may find interesting.
A coup d'état(/?ku?de?'t??/; French: blow of state; plural: coups d'état), also known as a coup, a putsch, or an overthrow, is the sudden and illegal seizure of a government, usually instigated by a small group of the existing state establishment to depose the established government and replace it with a new ruling body. A coup d'état is considered successful when the usurpers establish their dominance. When the coup either fails or doesn't entirely succeed, a civil war is a possible consequence.
A coup d'état typically uses the extant government's power to assume political control of the country. In Coup d'État: A Practical Handbook[page needed], military historian Edward Luttwak states that " coup consists of the infiltration of a small, but critical, segment of the state apparatus, which is then used to displace the government from its control of the remainder." The armed forces, whether military or paramilitary, can be a defining factor of a coup d'état.
Usage of the phrase Coup D'etat Politically, a coup d'état is a usually violent method of political engineering, which affects who rules in the government, without radical changes in the form of the government, the political system.
Tactically, a coup d'état involves control, by an active minority of usurpers, who block the remaining (non-participant) defenders of the state's possible defence of the attacked government, by either capturing or expelling the politico-military leaders, and seizing physical control of the country's key government offices, communications media, and infrastructure. It is to be noted that in the latest years there has been a broad use of the phrase in mass media, which may contradict the legal definition of "coup d'état". In looser usage (as in intelligence coup, boardroom coup) the term simply refers to gaining a sudden advantage on a rival.
Thanks to all of you ladies and gents for your sharp political comments, and for those of you who have concerns about the proper usages (as you know it to mean) of the phrase coup d'etat, here's something you may find interesting.
A coup d'état(/?ku?de?'t??/; French: blow of state; plural: coups d'état), also known as a coup, a putsch, or an overthrow, is the sudden and illegal seizure of a government, usually instigated by a small group of the existing state establishment to depose the established government and replace it with a new ruling body. A coup d'état is considered successful when the usurpers establish their dominance. When the coup either fails or doesn't entirely succeed, a civil war is a possible consequence.
A coup d'état typically uses the extant government's power to assume political control of the country. In Coup d'État: A Practical Handbook[page needed], military historian Edward Luttwak states that " coup consists of the infiltration of a small, but critical, segment of the state apparatus, which is then used to displace the government from its control of the remainder." The armed forces, whether military or paramilitary, can be a defining factor of a coup d'état.
Usage of the phrase Coup D'etat Politically, a coup d'état is a usually violent method of political engineering, which affects who rules in the government, without radical changes in the form of the government, the political system.
Tactically, a coup d'état involves control, by an active minority of usurpers, who block the remaining (non-participant) defenders of the state's possible defence of the attacked government, by either capturing or expelling the politico-military leaders, and seizing physical control of the country's key government offices, communications media, and infrastructure. It is to be noted that in the latest years there has been a broad use of the phrase in mass media, which may contradict the legal definition of "coup d'état". In looser usage (as in intelligence coup, boardroom coup) the term simply refers to gaining a sudden advantage on a rival.
Thanks to all of you ladies and gents for your sharp political comments, and for those of you who have concerns about the proper usages of the phrase coup d'etat ( as you know it to be used), here's something you may find interesting.
A coup d'état (/?ku?de?'t??/; French: blow of state; plural: coups d'état), also known as a coup, a putsch, or an overthrow, is the sudden and illegal seizure of a government, usually instigated by a small group of the existing state establishment to depose the established government and replace it with a new ruling body. A coup d'état is considered successful when the usurpers establish their dominance. When the coup either fails or doesn't entirely succeed, a civil war is a possible consequence.
A coup d'état typically uses the extant government's power to assume political control of the country. In Coup d'État: A Practical Handbook[page needed], military historian Edward Luttwak states that "a coup consists of the infiltration of a small, but critical, segment of the state apparatus, which is then used to displace the government from its control of the remainder." The armed forces, whether military or paramilitary, can be a defining factor of a coup d'état.
Usage of the phrase Coup D'etat Politically, a coup d'état is a usually (this not not mean always) violent method of political engineering, which affects who rules in the government, without radical changes in the form of the government, the political system.
Tactically, a coup d'état involves control, by an active minority of usurpers, who block the remaining (non-participant) defenders of the state's possible defence of the attacked government, by either capturing or expelling the politico-military leaders, and seizing physical control of the country's key government offices, communications media, and infrastructure.
It is to be noted that in the latest years there has been a broad use of the phrase in mass media, which may contradict the legal definition of "coup d'état". In looser usage (as in intelligence coup, boardroom coup) the term simply refers to gaining a sudden advantage on a rival.
Thanks to all of you for your comments and concerns about the proper usage of the term coup d'etat.
its time for americans to start calling, writing and take advantage
of this now, I let all of my numbersusa stuff pile up and sent it
all out a little while ago, we do have to be worried about, the
rhino, blueblood, checkpant, white shoe boys..... mcconnell
boener, mccain, cornyn, the gang of eight are worrisome,
call or write your rep
remind them that we did not vote for them to side with the saul alynski subverives, tell em they need to order orange jumpett suits, go wake up the Sargent of arms,...remind them to tell the lobbyists out side the door ta take a hike! use your own discression, you guys are smart, shame em, make em listen... its easier to make the republicrats stop the lucy globalists than the other way around...
ps somtimes I remind them of their colleagues better voting record
SistaCallie: Thanks to all of you ladies and gents for your sharp political comments, and for those of you who have concerns about the proper usages of the phrase coup d'etat ( as you know it to be used), here's something you may find interesting.
A coup d'état (/?ku?de?'t??/; French: blow of state; plural: coups d'état), also known as a coup, a putsch, or an overthrow, is the sudden and illegal seizure of a government, usually instigated by a small group of the existing state establishment to depose the established government and replace it with a new ruling body. A coup d'état is considered successful when the usurpers establish their dominance. When the coup either fails or doesn't entirely succeed, a civil war is a possible consequence.
A coup d'état typically uses the extant government's power to assume political control of the country. In Coup d'État: A Practical Handbook[page needed], military historian Edward Luttwak states that "a coup consists of the infiltration of a small, but critical, segment of the state apparatus, which is then used to displace the government from its control of the remainder." The armed forces, whether military or paramilitary, can be a defining factor of a coup d'état.
Usage of the phrase Coup D'etat Politically, a coup d'état is a usually (this not not mean always) violent method of political engineering, which affects who rules in the government, without radical changes in the form of the government, the political system.
Tactically, a coup d'état involves control, by an active minority of usurpers, who block the remaining (non-participant) defenders of the state's possible defence of the attacked government, by either capturing or expelling the politico-military leaders, and seizing physical control of the country's key government offices, communications media, and infrastructure.
It is to be noted that in the latest years there has been a broad use of the phrase in mass media, which may contradict the legal definition of "coup d'état". In looser usage (as in intelligence coup, boardroom coup) the term simply refers to gaining a sudden advantage on a rival.
Thanks to all of you for your comments and concerns about the proper usage of the term coup d'etat.
crayons: its time for americans to start calling, writing and take advantage
of this now, I let all of my numbersusa stuff pile up and sent it
all out a little while ago, we do have to be worried about, the
rhino, blueblood, checkpant, white shoe boys..... mcconnell
boener, mccain, cornyn, the gang of eight are worrisome,
call or write your rep
remind them that we did not vote for them to side with the saul alynski subverives, tell em they need to order orange jumpett suits, go wake up the Sargent of arms,...remind them to tell the lobbyists out side the door ta take a hike! use your own discression, you guys are smart, shame em, make em listen... its easier to make the republicrats stop the lucy globalists than the other way around...
ps somtimes I remind them of their colleagues better voting record
watchdog way of old,tell ur rep.is gone,them wont know or think anyone is paying attn.fox/cnn do the rah rah,they arent above the law/myth anymore,insider trading,etc.
the good ones still respond, the bad ones either won't or have
just sent the standard form letters back or get harassed on the phone
fer money. I remember some time back calling local state senator
about the local cigarette tax increase would increase crime, and I layed it out and she started cryin, sure enough there were trucks bein hijacked stores bein robbed. I was in new mexico at the time hearing it on the news there but it was not reported in tx. BTW she had an r in front of her name.
crayons: the good ones still respond, the bad ones either won't or have
just sent the standard form letters back or get harassed on the phone
fer money. I remember some time back calling local state senator
about the local cigarette tax increase would increase crime, and I layed it out and she started cryin, sure enough there were trucks bein hijacked stores bein robbed. I was in new mexico at the time hearing it on the news there but it was not reported in tx. BTW she had an r in front of her name.
ask a hard question,they wont,lynn jenkins/rep.kansas ad said she fought her party on womens rights/Rs,she pulled the ad,she shouldve added poor,etc.on that,u wanted it usa u got it,in jan./say ouch n i told u so.
crayons: the good ones still respond, the bad ones either won't or have
just sent the standard form letters back or get harassed on the phone
fer money. I remember some time back calling local state senator
about the local cigarette tax increase would increase crime, and I layed it out and she started cryin, sure enough there were trucks bein hijacked stores bein robbed. I was in new mexico at the time hearing it on the news there but it was not reported in tx. BTW she had an r in front of her name.
A lot of robberies in NZ of stores selling smokes . Some armed with a few deaths over the years . Priced out of the reach of poor smokers deliberately by taxes designed to make them stop smoking .
I see no Coup d'Etat there, only Democratic Elections, fortunately for You Americans. Coup d'Etat is only about the Military (as Juntas did in South America) taking the Power by Force.
galrads: Looks like the Right are having a good night so far tonight. Fox News staff appear happy.
Not sure it matters in the USA anymore. Like the saying goes, there aren't Republicans and there aren't Democrats, We've been had, there are only Haves and Have Nots.
Hey, Sista.....
yep,n latins made dems work for their dream/votes,way to citizenship or no votes n Rs win,woke up dems for 2 yrs.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).