Global Warming Data (34)
Dedovix: This story is starting to break worldwide right now across the media, with The Telegraph now reporting "NOAA's US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been 'adjusting' its record by replacing real temperatures with data 'fabricated' by computer models."
Because the actual historical temperature record doesn't fit the frenzied, doomsday narrative of global warming being fronted today on the political stage, the data were simply altered using "computer models" and then published as fact.
Because the actual historical temperature record doesn't fit the frenzied, doomsday narrative of global warming being fronted today on the political stage, the data were simply altered using "computer models" and then published as fact.
So we are better off than they thought? That would be some good news.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dedovix: This story is starting to break worldwide right now across the media, with The Telegraph now reporting "NOAA's US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been 'adjusting' its record by replacing real temperatures with data 'fabricated' by computer models."
Because the actual historical temperature record doesn't fit the frenzied, doomsday narrative of global warming being fronted today on the political stage, the data were simply altered using "computer models" and then published as fact.
Because the actual historical temperature record doesn't fit the frenzied, doomsday narrative of global warming being fronted today on the political stage, the data were simply altered using "computer models" and then published as fact.
The Vermin been crooking for Years!
Couple of Decades at the least!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dedovix: This story is starting to break worldwide right now across the media, with The Telegraph now reporting "NOAA's US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been 'adjusting' its record by replacing real temperatures with data 'fabricated' by computer models."
Because the actual historical temperature record doesn't fit the frenzied, doomsday narrative of global warming being fronted today on the political stage, the data were simply altered using "computer models" and then published as fact.
Because the actual historical temperature record doesn't fit the frenzied, doomsday narrative of global warming being fronted today on the political stage, the data were simply altered using "computer models" and then published as fact.
Don't know why governments, rather than sacking any scientist that doesn't agree with there somewhat short on fact ideas about global warming, don't just admit we have to do something about polution, particularly in cities where breathing the air makes smoking look like a healthy pastime
------ This thread is Archived ------
zmountainman: Don't know why governments, rather than sacking any scientist that doesn't agree with there somewhat short on fact ideas about global warming, don't just admit we have to do something about polution, particularly in cities where breathing the air makes smoking look like a healthy pastime
Too much Money in Carbon-Credits!
Besides it is also a huge Scheme for distributing Wealth,that's why the UN is so hellbent after a legally binding Global "Treaty"!!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dedovix: This story is starting to break worldwide right now across the media, with The Telegraph now reporting "NOAA's US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been 'adjusting' its record by replacing real temperatures with data 'fabricated' by computer models."
Because the actual historical temperature record doesn't fit the frenzied, doomsday narrative of global warming being fronted today on the political stage, the data were simply altered using "computer models" and then published as fact.
Because the actual historical temperature record doesn't fit the frenzied, doomsday narrative of global warming being fronted today on the political stage, the data were simply altered using "computer models" and then published as fact.
We called that 'FUDGING' in the early days of my career in air quality control with EPA. Yes, your honor, there were a lot of FUDGED data before reliable and accurate techniques for measuring and reporting environmental data that are today all referenced to standard materials provided by the national bureau of Standards (now NIST.).
------ This thread is Archived ------
zmountainman: Don't know why governments, rather than sacking any scientist that doesn't agree with there somewhat short on fact ideas about global warming, don't just admit we have to do something about polution, particularly in cities where breathing the air makes smoking look like a healthy pastime
Maybe you guys are driving too many dirty diesel powered vehicles built in Germany by Volkswagen? Did 2015 actually see automatic traffic restrictions there in some cities in Spain? Because the thresholds put in place to protect human health were exceeded on 150 days out of a maximum of 183, during the 2014 summer?
------ This thread is Archived ------
galrads: Maybe you guys are driving too many dirty diesel powered vehicles built in Germany by Volkswagen? Did 2015 actually see automatic traffic restrictions there in some cities in Spain? Because the thresholds put in place to protect human health were exceeded on 150 days out of a maximum of 183, during the 2014 summer?
If you took EVERY vehicle in the world off the road, it would make no difference to the planet's warming. Sure, it would certainly improve the pollution problem, but as for the warming angle would have zero effect. Since measurements began the rate of warming has remained relatively constant. There were relatively few vehicles on the road in 1900 compared to today, yet the degree of warming has not increased substantially as would be expected if indeed vehicular emissions were the problem. Any Boy Scout who has ever been near a campfire will know the closer you get to the fire, the hotter it gets. Simple logic.We have the Sun, without which life would cease to exist on Earth as our heat source. Every year the Earth moves inexorably closer to this source, and logic dictates that the nearer the Earth moves, the hotter it will become. As there is no way to prevent this movement toward the Sun, there is therefor no way to halt the warming effect on the planet. I invite all you "scientists" to disprove the above thesis, or offer a plausible alternative.
------ This thread is Archived ------
galrads: Maybe you guys are driving too many dirty diesel powered vehicles built in Germany by Volkswagen? Did 2015 actually see automatic traffic restrictions there in some cities in Spain? Because the thresholds put in place to protect human health were exceeded on 150 days out of a maximum of 183, during the 2014 summer?
If you took EVERY vehicle in the world off the road, it would make no difference to the planet's warming. Sure, it would certainly improve the pollution problem, but as for the warming angle would have zero effect. Since measurements began the rate of warming has remained relatively constant. There were relatively few vehicles on the road in 1900 compared to today, yet the degree of warming has not increased substantially as would be expected if indeed vehicular emissions were the problem. Any Boy Scout who has ever been near a campfire will know the closer you get to the fire, the hotter it gets. Simple logic.We have the Sun, without which life would cease to exist on Earth as our heat source. Every year the Earth moves inexorably closer to this source, and logic dictates that the nearer the Earth moves, the hotter it will become. As there is no way to prevent this movement toward the Sun, there is therefor no way to halt the warming effect on the planet. I invite all you "scientists" to disprove the above thesis, or offer a plausible alternative.
------ This thread is Archived ------
galrads: Maybe you guys are driving too many dirty diesel powered vehicles built in Germany by Volkswagen? Did 2015 actually see automatic traffic restrictions there in some cities in Spain? Because the thresholds put in place to protect human health were exceeded on 150 days out of a maximum of 183, during the 2014 summer?
You could well be right on that, it hasn't affect my local town as yet, firstly it's not normally that busy & secondly they've placed the measuring equipment on the side of town that get a breeze from the sea & next to a large public park
------ This thread is Archived ------
Geriatrix2: If you took EVERY vehicle in the world off the road, it would make no difference to the planet's warming. Sure, it would certainly improve the pollution problem, but as for the warming angle would have zero effect. Since measurements began the rate of warming has remained relatively constant. There were relatively few vehicles on the road in 1900 compared to today, yet the degree of warming has not increased substantially as would be expected if indeed vehicular emissions were the problem. Any Boy Scout who has ever been near a campfire will know the closer you get to the fire, the hotter it gets. Simple logic.
We have the Sun, without which life would cease to exist on Earth as our heat source. Every year the Earth moves inexorably closer to this source, and logic dictates that the nearer the Earth moves, the hotter it will become. As there is no way to prevent this movement toward the Sun, there is therefor no way to halt the warming effect on the planet. I invite all you "scientists" to disprove the above thesis, or offer a plausible alternative.
We have the Sun, without which life would cease to exist on Earth as our heat source. Every year the Earth moves inexorably closer to this source, and logic dictates that the nearer the Earth moves, the hotter it will become. As there is no way to prevent this movement toward the Sun, there is therefor no way to halt the warming effect on the planet. I invite all you "scientists" to disprove the above thesis, or offer a plausible alternative.
and I still insist that there would be less pollution and less warming if more people would grow beards and plant me re synthetic trees. ------ This thread is Archived ------
Dedovix: This story is starting to break worldwide right now across the media, with The Telegraph now reporting "NOAA's US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been 'adjusting' its record by replacing real temperatures with data 'fabricated' by computer models."
Because the actual historical temperature record doesn't fit the frenzied, doomsday narrative of global warming being fronted today on the political stage, the data were simply altered using "computer models" and then published as fact.
Kill the trees , ban CO2 . Put up a parking lot .Because the actual historical temperature record doesn't fit the frenzied, doomsday narrative of global warming being fronted today on the political stage, the data were simply altered using "computer models" and then published as fact.
------ This thread is Archived ------
galrads: and I still insist that there would be less pollution and less warming if more people would grow beards and plant me re more synthetic trees.
------ This thread is Archived ------
epirb: Kill the trees , ban CO2 . Put up a parking lot .
This is exactly what happened to Flint, Michigan, when General Motors became Government Motors. EPA just looked the other way when it was all paved over.
I think they have to try and pipe drinking water from Detroit to Flint because ground water in Flint is now too polluted.
All the GM jobs went to Mexico and so they bulldozed Flint into a large surface paved parking lot.
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
galrads: This is exactly what happened to Flint, Michigan, when General Motors became Government Motors. EPA just looked the other way when it was all paved over.
I think they have to try and pipe drinking water from Detroit to Flint because ground water in Flint is now too polluted.
All the GM jobs went to Mexico and so they bulldozed Flint into a large surface paved parking lot.
must of happened before to , somebody wrote a song about it a while back I think they have to try and pipe drinking water from Detroit to Flint because ground water in Flint is now too polluted.
All the GM jobs went to Mexico and so they bulldozed Flint into a large surface paved parking lot.
you to Raddy------ This thread is Archived ------
epirb: must of happened before to , somebody wrote a song about it a while back
you to Raddy
you to Raddy
Joni Mitchell.
Personally, I'm pretty sure that if we could stop all the cow sh#t coming out of Washington, our Methane problem would disappear overnight.
------ This thread is Archived ------
No snow here but it did seasonably snow about a month ago.
High of 6C.and partially sunny tomorrow.
High of 6C.and partially sunny tomorrow.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Name a government agency that doesn't "create" data that perpetuates the fraud?
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
your personality
rarotonga
everything is changing
1830's Music
Sleepy Don!
Nature
Common Issues with the BMW X1
How far is too far?
other can see but not you
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
2,723 Views
33 Comments
in Chat Threads
Created: Dec 2015
Last Viewed: May 9
Last Commented: Dec 2015
0 Likes
Because the actual historical temperature record doesn't fit the frenzied, doomsday narrative of global warming being fronted today on the political stage, the data were simply altered using "computer models" and then published as fact.