Complaint to CS administration (66)
Oxycodone: Just a thought was on a thread by another user and you made a comment re: ghostbusters, was hilarious.
Oxy, please refresh my memory what I said about ghostbusters
Oxycodone: .... if one is interested in another.
secretagent09: Oxy, please refresh my memory what I said about ghostbusters
It was on one of galrads threads some time ago and he requested help for one reason or another and you replied call ghostbusters and posted the soundtrack. I will try and find it in a search.
Oxycodone: It was on one of galrads threads some time ago and he requested help for one reason or another and you replied call ghostbusters and posted the soundtrack. I will try and find it in a search.
I do remember something like that but it must have been a long time ago. You don't have to look for it.secretagent09: I do remember something like that but it must have been a long time ago. You don't have to look for it.
There is maintenance so I can’t search. Yes it was a good while ago but very memorable, such quick wit.Oxycodone: There is maintenance so I can’t search. Yes it was a good while ago but very memorable, such quick wit.
Cheers to you as well 
secretagent09: Spitz, I saw that today that I have to log in and the threads at the bottom of the forum page are shaded so I can't read them. I should practice what I said a few days ago that if I don't like something about CS I should keep it to myself. However, this requirement to login is the exception, I am not keeping it to myself that it annoys me that I have to login so I am going to cancel my membership. It's not a big deal cause I'm not here as much as I was years ago.
Hi secret,The good old days have gone when it used to be fun to log in and catch up with some really lovely people.
Of late I have just glanced at the site without logging in to see if there was anything of interest as I've been away from here for nearly 3 years. Sad to say nothing has changed and like you I might just leave them all to it.
Stay well
secretagent09: Spitz, I saw that today that I have to log in and the threads at the bottom of the forum page are shaded so I can't read them. I should practice what I said a few days ago that if I don't like something about CS I should keep it to myself. However, this requirement to login is the exception, I am not keeping it to myself that it annoys me that I have to login so I am going to cancel my membership. It's not a big deal cause I'm not here as much as I was years ago.
I don't read offline but after reading this post of yours I had a sticky beak at CS whilst being offline.I could see threads & posts clearly offline
I could see members profile pics clearly offline
The only thing that is blurred is the information a member has on their profile
online today!I never realised there is now a daily limit on the number of messages you can send if you don't have a premium account.
If the CS admins think I'm going to spend almost $10 per month on what is, after all, a pretty basic and rudimentary dating website. They are very sadly mistaken.
If the CS admins think I'm going to spend almost $10 per month on what is, after all, a pretty basic and rudimentary dating website. They are very sadly mistaken.
online today!Just after noticing that even if you do pay $9 per month, you are still only able to send 20 messages per day! Is this some sort of a joke?
Jagmaster2: I never realised there is now a daily limit on the number of messages you can send if you don't have a premium account.
If the CS admins think I'm going to spend almost $10 per month on what is, after all, a pretty basic and rudimentary dating website. They are very sadly mistaken.
For the record, how many new contacts do you make daily?If the CS admins think I'm going to spend almost $10 per month on what is, after all, a pretty basic and rudimentary dating website. They are very sadly mistaken.
online today!You only get about 10 free messages without a Premium account now before you're blocked from replying for the day. I was chatting to someone and I didn't realise this and now she must think I snubbed her or something, lol.
Still, there's always WhatsApp and Email to exchange messages. Damned if I'm going to be paying this site for the privilege.
Still, there's always WhatsApp and Email to exchange messages. Damned if I'm going to be paying this site for the privilege.
Those low allowance figures are likely to drive people on here into exchanging numbers eg WhatsApp much too soon without getting to know who they are talking to. Going against their own safety advice on this site and likely placing the users of this site in more dangerous territory than is necessary
online today!Has this place been taken over by new owners do you know?
Jagmaster2: Has this place been taken over by new owners do you know?
I don't know but from reading other comments on here a certain other fishy site went the monetised route before being sold to a certain match making dot com site .... seems it increases the value
I think restricting messages discourages scammers from sending block messages to countless people.
Limiting messages also encourages people to stick to a select few who they deem is a future , or potential match , rather than talking to multiple people with no intention of meeting.
Limiting messages also encourages people to stick to a select few who they deem is a future , or potential match , rather than talking to multiple people with no intention of meeting.
Whataboutromance: I don't know but from reading other comments on here a certain other fishy site went the monetised route before being sold to a certain match making dot com site .... seems it increases the value
putting this out there as an opinion (can't be sued for having an opinion and stating it as such..)the monied sites never quite let one solidify a friendship/relationship. The longer you stay on and visit "members' profiles, the more you pay. Sort of like the therapist who never reaches the last session for you. Why should he? What? And stop the cash flow?? Right? Be smarter than them.
online today!Youcannow: I think restricting messages discourages scammers from sending block messages to countless people.
Limiting messages also encourages people to stick to a select few who they deem is a future , or potential match , rather than talking to multiple people with no intention of meeting.
I'm not an expert, but would using a VPN allow you to circumvent any restrictions?Limiting messages also encourages people to stick to a select few who they deem is a future , or potential match , rather than talking to multiple people with no intention of meeting.
online today!Free to use it says on the main homepage, nothing mentioned about any limits or restrictions etc.
More Threads
1830's Music
How far is too far?
Sleepy Don!
Nature
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
other can see but not you
Feel Good Music
your personality
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
rarotonga
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Times are changing it seems.