I'm not trying to be being rude, but to listen to any of U advocating either Clinton only shows that U really believe that either of them care about something other than getting the other elected. If U stepped out of UR hate republican/bush box U would see how everything said by either of them at any time, only reflects last nights polls. It's the truth and so few will open themselves to it for their own personal reasons; Of which I have never heard a good arguement for. Only my opinion.
I think that all the canidates care, but the canidates have varying degrees of experience, and successes. I think that their previous record is important.
They bash clinton for crying, they are so critical, she has no role models for her to follow...
Bush, I sorry, he does not say the smartest things some times.
So take out the crying thing, then what... we are still left with the experience, and smarts.
Do you know that G W Bush has a trail of business failures, it IS A FACT.
Hillary, as a successfull author, donated proceeds of million dollars from her book to charity.
We are talking about the Presidency of the United States. Something less important like brain surgery on Ur child. Would U allow Ur surgeons wife to operate just because he was retired? Now mind U - he is right there to tell her what to do. She has only done and said what it takes to be president - she has not accomplished anything but have someone help her put a good book together and then donated the money from it because she didn't need it anyways. I'm sorry but the only genuine emotion I have seen is when she is mad. I could care less about the crying - we all do it and I think I could cry my way through the presidency and still so a better job than has been done in twenty years Clinton is boring and driven by polls gimme real thought and don't forget - there are alot of repulicans that U won't even consider simply becasue they are republicans I like Ur enthusiasm though and I don't ever believe U said it was because she is a woman.
1. While First Lady of Arkansas invested $1000 in the commodities market and made roughly $100,000. Do you think she did this because she is a genius? Possibly, not probably. This is the first and only time she has invested in the commodities market. The more likely scenario is that Tyson Foods'...chicken... brokers had a big part in this. They had everything to gain and nothing to lose.
2. Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, AR, her employer, is still trying to figure out what documents she shredded before she left town.
3. Successful author and donated millions to charity. Do you think she sat down at a keyboard and typed the script. Not a chance. Would the small item of being presiding or past First Lady have any bearing on the success. ABSOLUTELY. Did she donate millions to charity out of the goodness of her heart, being the compassionate person that she is? Maybe a tiny, tiny percentage of it. Tax benefits and knowing that in the future she wants to be PRESIDENT would be the more correct answer. Looks great on a resime.
4. While First Lady of the Unied States of America brought forth a CHANGE, as the candidates are wearing out in the campaign, in the way healthcare is run. How did that turn out? Laid a big EGG, pardon the pun...Tyson Foods. Since she has never hardly had a real job or run a real business would that not classify as a FAILURE? Living off the tax payers is her business and the only thing she ever tried to do on a national scale, failed.
In finishing, being a former First Lady and a Senator does not give you any experience to be President. Most experience being President comes from ON THE JOB TRAINING.
You may not want to hear it but I have more coming, at a later time, on The great Social Security scam. The Democrats Baby and they don't want the Republicans to change or fix it because then they would have nothing to fall back on except Welfare and Public Education which is in shambles. I had to throw in a little Richard Nixon sign.
This country is in a position that cannot afford on the job training....time is of the essence my friend....and as far as all your other opinions regarding this womans motives, and or objectives, they are all hearsay. If you have bashing to do, back it up with facts, not your slanted opinions.......
I woke up this morning to find that Hillary had come from behind to take New Hampshire. I have not been as passionate about a political race since trying to stop Bush from getting a second term....so the news nearly brought me to tears. Of course, in this forum, I anticipate that this comment will bring about a sarcastic response.
I sincerely appreciate your intellegent thought into this process. I not only agree with you wholeheartedly, but also appreciate your candor and courage to voice your opinion in the mannerisms of others who comment in these forums. The rules of engagement here, are truly obscured, but in the sense that this site is primarily not a political site, I would caution those who wish to expose themselves so readily, to remember, that others are watching..............
I do not like to see a dynasty forming in the Democratic party. We are all aware of the Bush dynasty feassco. The problem with government is that the well to do have establish themselves in it and preverted the constitution and principles of early America. Ron Paul is the only canidate who talks with some common sense. Sadly I am a democrate with a poor choice of canidates again and Clinton will be last on the list to vote for.
If a decent candidate from an opposing party were the better choice, then I would have to forget about voting along party lines and vote for the person that I thought had the country's best interests at heart.
wanderinggnomeBelle Fourche, South Dakota USA688 posts
Oh PLEASE!
I don't trust politicians that much, but I refuse to get my facts from Rosie O'donnel!
I also like a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy, But 9/11 was nothing more than a bunch of crazed morons running planes into buidings. And the CIA operative? Just what kind of information was she passing? And if we have a conspiracy, the CIA would be the ones brought in to handle it,
I don't think so. I think what America is asking for change and this is the premise that each candidate is trying to adjust their rhetoric to.
If this is the case, I don't see change coming from Hillary and I don't believe we need any more of the Clintons. She does have some good points i.e. healthcare, social programs, etc... But, if you look at history you will see that her husband ran and was elected on the same platform yet the problem is still there.
Besides, I don't trust her and I don't buy the crocodile tears shed because Obama was ahead of her in the polls. Even if they were real, heart felt emotion, I seriously doubt they were for the American people but shed out of frustration for her own perceived failure.
Given a choice of just those 2, I would choose Obama in a heartbeat. He's not been around long enough to have all those people "waiting in the wings". People, who Hillary will be beholding to when all the campaign dust settles.
First lets get some clarification..... Hillary did not cry because O'bama was ahead in the polls...where did you come up with that?! Shed out of her percieved failure??!!! The question was simply putn to her..."How are you holding up Hillary?" If you were asked a similiar question after an exhauting hard working day I assume what ever emotional glitch you demonstrate would be somthing to do with an inadequacy in you life?.....get off it. That comment was completely slanted and biased in every respect. In your second paragraph, you state, "yet the problem is still there".... to what are you infering??? Are you even familiar with her voting record, or any of her stands on any issues? If so, what is it you don't trust? When you refer to Obama, you make my point exactly. He hasn't been around long enough (not enough experience)...to have those people (influential contacts)....waiting in the wings (available for consultation or respondsible action) Hillary will be holding to who...her husband... a world respected leader? Everyone practices some sort of croniism if you want to use the worst verbage, lest we not say that any politician choses his aids and cabinet for any other respondsible reason.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).