ARE THERE ANY REAL WOMEN LEFT? ( Archived) (396)

LBGuy777: The "o" in "ok" should be capitalized.
Why would I reveal such things to you? Moreover, you seem to be "stuck" in proving to me that you know something about psychology. In all reality all you have shown is how simple-minded you are and that you are unable to focus on the issue at hand. Instead dwelling off into diatribes about psychology papers, faculty, etc. Stay focused.
No, but I am sure you will tell us about yours. As a matter of fact you post as if you are applying for a job rather than debating the issue at hand.
The word "you" was quoted from your post. And I see you managed to catch where I failed to put a space between no one. Wow. Let's see your numerous "spelling" mistakes to my failure to separate "no" and "one." You can't be serious.
Are you foreign? You sure spell like it. I'll let you sort that one out.
A debate can only take place if I have a worthy opponent to debate with. You fail to qualify.

You are starting to bore me. Have fun typing to yourself.

LBGuy777: The "o" in "ok" should be capitalized.
Why would I reveal such things to you? Moreover, you seem to be "stuck" in proving to me that you know something about psychology. In all reality all you have shown is how simple-minded you are and that you are unable to focus on the issue at hand. Instead dwelling off into diatribes about psychology papers, faculty, etc. Stay focused.
No, but I am sure you will tell us about yours. As a matter of fact you post as if you are applying for a job rather than debating the issue at hand.
The word "you" was quoted from your post. And I see you managed to catch where I failed to put a space between no one. Wow. Let's see your numerous "spelling" mistakes to my failure to separate "no" and "one." You can't be serious.
Are you foreign? You sure spell like it. I'll let you sort that one out.
A debate can only take place if I have a worthy opponent to debate with. You fail to qualify.

You are starting to bore me. Have fun typing to yourself.

FlowerOfTheSun: I beg to differ!! "...the usage of whom is synonimous..." is invalid English
Whom can only ever refer to a person ... should be "the usage of which" ...
Also "whom" cannot always substitute the word "who" , only in certain cases depending where it is placed whithin a sentence.

Eg: To whom it may concern...
Whom did you call?
He is the man to whom I was married ... etc...

I have noticed many times how people often use "whom" (wrongly) in order to sound more educated

In response to: Main Entry: who
Pronunciation: \'hü, ü\
Function: pronoun
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English hwa; akin to Old High German hwer, interrog. pron., who, Latin quis, Greek tis, Latin qui, relative pron., who
Date: before 12th century

usage see whom, that

LBGuy777: The "o" in "ok" should be capitalized.
Why would I reveal such things to you? Moreover, you seem to be "stuck" in proving to me that you know something about psychology. In all reality all you have shown is how simple-minded you are and that you are unable to focus on the issue at hand. Instead dwelling off into diatribes about psychology papers, faculty, etc. Stay focused.
No, but I am sure you will tell us about yours. As a matter of fact you post as if you are applying for a job rather than debating the issue at hand.
The word "you" was quoted from your post. And I see you managed to catch where I failed to put a space between no one. Wow. Let's see your numerous "spelling" mistakes to my failure to separate "no" and "one." You can't be serious.
Are you foreign? You sure spell like it. I'll let you sort that one out.
A debate can only take place if I have a worthy opponent to debate with. You fail to qualify.

You are starting to bore me. Have fun typing to yourself.

LBGuy777: Also I said many times not "always" as verified by my own post: "To be frank the usage of whom is synonymous with who in many cases."

Keep digging you may find something. Heck, the psuedo-intellectual found that I did not separate NO ONE!

Portiea: Why do you do this?

OK is an abbreviation of the word okay. As an abbreviation, if one were concerned about being correct, which we are not terribly concerned about here as we are just chatting, but, if one were so concerned, one would capitalize both the 'o' and the 'k'; however, if one were wishing to be absolutely correct, one would write the word out in full: okay?

LBGuy777: They teach you to capitalize the first word in a sentence in pre-school. Nine year olds can do it. You're making yourself look like even more of an idiot with your comments. Just keep quiet.

LBGuy777: They teach you to capitalize the first word in a sentence in pre-school. Nine year olds can do it. You're making yourself look like even more of an idiot with your comments. Just keep quiet.