Marseilles: I've been previously married and did take my second wife's name. I don't think it is absolutely necessary for the woman to take her husband's name.
sweetowen: When I was married, I took my ex's last name. And being that it was 12 letters long, I chose not to hyphenate it. But when I got divorced, I took my maiden name back. If I ever get married again, I'll either keep my maiden name or hyphenate it. I paid to get my rightful name back... not totally giving it up again!
There was a doctor in the town I used to live in who upon marrying his wife, they BOTH hyphenated their names! How cool is that??
Wow what a sign of mutual respect! I like this. Really like this idea. As for me, I took my Husband's name and retained it when we divorced. I am not sure what I would do if I ever remarried, take my new husband's name or go back to my maiden( Hyphenated) new husband's name.
Now, that the third option has been presented, I really am leaning to this...Thanks for the idea Sweet!..
Sparky55: I've been married and I would rather any future spouse retain her own last name. Hyphenated would be a good second choice but I think it's a big pain in the butt for men and women to go about changing all their identity to reflect a new last name i.e. license, credit cards, etc..
After my last divorce , I took back the father of my children's name before him. It was less confusing for the school, they still called me by what my childrens last name was. But I would except my next husbands last name, I feel it to be a show of respect of him.
BarrenPneuma: My last name is a testament to a man I have never seen in any way as a father or a man worthy of having his name continue through my life. I would gladly take the woman I Love's name as it has not lost any semblance of what should be recognized as a surname of honour and pride. I guess it would depend on the situation but I would never force my last name upon anyone willing or unwilling. If they chose to forgo their own I would likewise not object and in doing so perhaps regain some semblance of meaning for a word that to me has lost all meaning.
In some Alaskan and American Indian Tribes, the Man takes the Woman's name when they marry.
mexikanska: Do you know how you must call king of spain?
Su Majestad Don Juan Carlos I De Borbón y Borbón, Rey de España, Rey de Castilla, de León, de Aragón, de las Dos Sicilias, de Jerusalén, de Navarra, de Granada, de Toledo, de Valencia, de Galicia, de Cerdeña, de Córdoba, de Córcega, de Murcia, de Jaén, de los Algarves, de Algerciras, de Gibraltar, de las Islas Canarias, de las Indias Orientales y Occidentales, de las Islas y Tierra Firme del Mar Océano; Archiduque de Austria; Duque de Borgoña, de Brabante, de Milán, de Atenas y Neopatria; Conde de Habsburgo, de Flandes, del Tirol, del Rosellón, y de Barcelona; Señor de Vizcaya y de Molina; Capitán General de las Reales Fuerzas Armadas y su Comandante Supremo; Soberano Gran Maestre de la Insigne Orden del Toisón de Oro, Caballero de la Orden de San Javier, Caballero de la Orden de la Anunciada, Caballero de la Orden de la Jarretera, Bailío Gran Cruz de Justicia con Collar de la Orden de Constantino y Jorge de Grecia, Bailío Gran Cruz de Honor y Devoción de la Soberana Orden Militar de Malta, Gran Collar de la Reina de Saba, Gran Cordón de la Orden Suprema del Crisantemo de Japón, Gran Collar de la Dinastía de Reza de Irán, Gran Cruz de la Legión de Honor y de la Orden Nacional de Mérito. Y de cuantas Órdenes discierne el Estado Español (Montesa, Alcántara, Calatrava y Santiago
cross my heart too.....
What a mouthful! I couldn't remember all of that if my life depended on it!
Dknew: I'm not sure about this one, On one hand you have a respect issue for the husband and on the other a identity issue for some woman.
It is a lot of hassle to have to get everything changed. But the Identity thing isn't a problem for most I believe unless she is getting married often and no one can remember what name the person is going by.
mylifewithu: It is a lot of hassle to have to get everything changed. But the Identity thing isn't a problem for most I believe unless she is getting married often and no one can remember what name the person is going by.
In a marriage without a Biblical belief......it doesn't make a dittlely squat.
otherwise! The two shall be one flesh. In body, spirit and mind. Then there sould be also one name. The last name then is a sign of oneness, family....the children have no confusion of belonging, being of, and love. Two flesh living each is never a union. When a couple have different names, seperate funds, seperate lives...it is only a marrige of convenance truly. It is confusion!!!!
RillyNiceGuy: In a marriage without a Biblical belief......it doesn't make a dittlely squat.
otherwise! The two shall be one flesh. In body, spirit and mind. Then there sould be also one name. The last name then is a sign of oneness, family....the children have no confusion of belonging, being of, and love. Two flesh living each is never a union. When a couple have different names, seperate funds, seperate lives...it is only a marrige of convenance truly. It is confusion!!!!
I like the idea of combining surnames - in this day and age why should the woman have all the inconvenience of changing the name on her bank accounts, passport etc?
I'd be proud to be known as Mr 'X-Y' the husband of Mrs 'Y-X'
(Why? because I'd love her and be delighted to have her name associated with mine)
RillyNiceGuy: In a marriage without a Biblical belief......it doesn't make a dittlely squat.
otherwise! The two shall be one flesh. In body, spirit and mind. Then there sould be also one name. The last name then is a sign of oneness, family....the children have no confusion of belonging, being of, and love. Two flesh living each is never a union. When a couple have different names, seperate funds, seperate lives...it is only a marrige of convenance truly. It is confusion!!!!
My sis-in-law and her 5 husband all signed prenup agreements and are all marriages of convenance. She never used either of their last names but used her maiden name. All their bank accounts were in seperate names.
rusty_knight: I like the idea of combining surnames - in this day and age why should the woman have all the inconvenience of changing the name on her bank accounts, passport etc?
I'd be proud to be known as Mr 'X-Y' the husband of Mrs 'Y-X'
(Why? because I'd love her and be delighted to have her name associated with mine)
Yeah, but then your kids get married and they become x-y-z's and before you know it you've got the whole damn alphabet and a few mutations to boot!
WhatUwish4: Yeah, but then your kids get married and they become x-y-z's and before you know it you've got the whole damn alphabet and a few mutations to boot!
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).