Which political leader would be best suited to run the world under globalism? (54)
altinabelgrade, Central Serbia Serbia746 Poststaff1: None of them are even fit enough to run their own countries let alone the world.
galrads: So, you are saying that Pres. Obama is like a modern-day one crying in the wilderness and positioning things for the one true leader to come? Who's being groomed for the top dictator job then?
Well,have u Ben Laden Lately?
I can't imagine globalization but if there was I would say a female but I don't know who. If a female was in charge maybe there would be less wars?
musicfreak: I can't imagine globalization but if there was I would say a female but I don't know who. If a female was in charge maybe there would be less wars?
Definitely NO Sarah Palin!
geeez if youre gonna put ahmadinejad up there you might as
well put kim jong il. maybe they could share the ignorance
well put kim jong il. maybe they could share the ignorance
sharkmeat: geeez if youre gonna put ahmadinejad up there you might as
well put kim jong il. maybe they could share the ignorance
well put kim jong il. maybe they could share the ignorance
Together they might beat out Obama.
invinciblemuse: SANTA CLAUS!
More like SATAN CLAUSE
robsantiago15: Cheech and Chong
They'd get my vote.
At least they'd be too stoned to start any wars or manufacture fake catastrophes.
The Brain; Donald Duck, Goofy...oh wait! Lady Gaga!!!
RayfromUSA: What with the ongoing collapse of the world's economic and political structure, Global government is clearly in the cards.
As James Warburg said nearly a century ago.
“We shall have global government whether you like or not like it, whether by conquest or by consent.”
But in view of the trend towards rubber stamp parliaments and ever more powerful executive leaders, I'm having a tough time deciding who we should put in charge of the whole world?
Help me out with your opinions.
As James Warburg said nearly a century ago.
“We shall have global government whether you like or not like it, whether by conquest or by consent.”
But in view of the trend towards rubber stamp parliaments and ever more powerful executive leaders, I'm having a tough time deciding who we should put in charge of the whole world?
Help me out with your opinions.
it was AL GORE i think
RayfromUSA:
What with the ongoing collapse of the world's economic and political structure, Global government is clearly in the cards.
As James Warburg said nearly a century ago.
“We shall have global government whether you like or not like it, whether by conquest or by consent.”
But in view of the trend towards rubber stamp parliaments and ever more powerful executive leaders, I'm having a tough time deciding who we should put in charge of the whole world?
He's busy rescuing drowning polar bears.
What with the ongoing collapse of the world's economic and political structure, Global government is clearly in the cards.
As James Warburg said nearly a century ago.
“We shall have global government whether you like or not like it, whether by conquest or by consent.”
But in view of the trend towards rubber stamp parliaments and ever more powerful executive leaders, I'm having a tough time deciding who we should put in charge of the whole world?
strict: it was AL GORE i think
He's busy rescuing drowning polar bears.
Hugo Chávez & Vladimir Putin on one side, and the rest of the population on the other side having no lieder ( anarchy rocks)....
Alex_D: The answer is really simple. You are wasting your time on any belief that you will have any say in who runs anything. It's laughable. when it comes to that point the people with the power will be the same people with real power now. They will appoint a leader as they see fit. You will of course get to "vote" on it, because they keep you under control with the illusion of your ability to have control. I agree entirely that global government is coming but the leader we will see in power will be the one who is most in line with the desires of the banks and corporations and is willing to do as he or she is told by those entities.
what happened to trillons of dollars under bush dem congress tried to find it/no luck/c span hearing somethings rotten in denmark!MovinFWD: More like SATAN CLAUSE
yupreb56: what happened to trillons of dollars under bush dem congress tried to find it/no luck/c span hearing somethings rotten in denmark!
Under Obama the billions are always available for giveaways to bankers.
At least as long as there is paper and ink to print up more funny-money with.
Boban1: Hugo Chávez & Vladimir Putin on one side, and the rest of the population on the other side having no lieder ( anarchy rocks)....
It's a shame we don't have a Prez that would take Chavez "out"
There is no such politician...nor can there ever be one....
.if there was......that would be a dictator....
.if there was......that would be a dictator....
happy_wealthy mashhad Iran
Any bobble head will do!
Conrad73: happy_wealthy mashhad Iran
Omg.. save us from that one Conrad!
Serpenta_Manon: Omg.. save us from that one Conrad!
Christmas1: Any bobble head will do!
Yeah it works for the US, why not for the world?
More Threads
Sleepy Don!
wanting beyond need
Feel Good Music
Common Issues with the BMW X1
men's perspective towards women
the way you look
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
other can see but not you
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
your personality
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »