No, undicided is ok. They just need to be more convinced of the motives of the swamp creatures, the ones who is more powerful than most. We're talking generals, senators, rich business folk, television, silicon wally... the list goes on. On the other side: Trump! -with a small following of decent politicians- but a HUGE crowd of voters.
There are some euro/australians too, who can not wrap head around real corruption, and how they in turn treat a threat to their continued bade in money under the table.. Somebody needs to turn up side down the whole darn swampee but that can't see the swamp for only fishes.
Hooha, how shocked do you think these navie ones would be if they got that the election actually was stolen, and the state courts was corrupt and biased (country split down the middle, only takes a few to flip side) and that even the supreme court justices don't want their personal life butcheres or even lives lost somehow just for doing their job, so they chicken out. Trump is the hero standing up to his insanity, while he could have dropped it all.
@ShawnSuperstar, Yes. To take him down has always been their self defense, cos he threaten to unmask them and do something about it too. The drain the swamp.
Nononono.... It means most americans actually understand it's a politically motivated "burn that witch"-hunt. The guy is innocent mister. Is it hard to see?
The ones downstairs was probably in on Jenny. Some were informed but to make everything as authentic as possible most guards was kept in the dark until the very last minute. Misused. A very cynical plan.
It is kind of funny to accuse your opponent of what you did yourself. They did exactly that in November 2020: "deprived the American voters of their voting rights" They did it, it was easy too. Why not proven in state courts.. guess why... hehe.
Televised or not is that, if the is the question I go with whatever Chancer recommend.
This is my only comment Jac, so please no questions this time, if that's ok. Thanks for the blog Gave me the chance to tell what I think. Super.
No. I think you are not normal when you have to pshyco analyze all this instead of actually trying to bridge for a better understanding. If we can not agree on the motves of this Putin guy not even one single bit we can never see much eye to eye here I think, so I tried to fiure out where you come from opposed to me. At least Tiger gave an answer.
I'm going now.
No, I don't plan to treat you badly, but I may ignore some and answer something you never asked or god knows what, like you did here to me. It basically gives me more freedom. - - -
Ok, Jac. Answer my question: what do Putin want with this war ?
If you don't answer that now, you're basically showing how you are a major gas lighter, seemingly helping me.. or the world I live in.. to get rid of some trouble or whatnot. Like healing me from a twisted view or something. Thanks for your effort... but for now...
What does that leader of Russia want with all this?
Last chance mf... as said by Samuel Jackson in Jackie Brown.
I will add, there was a civil unrest. Kiev presented it as an uprising without other reaons than economical gain supported by Russia. Some strategic planning from Moscow supposedly. From the Russian view (Donbass majority) the idea was to get free from Kievs rough bandits in azov gear harrasing them year after year, even if mother bear pitched in at times. Enough was enough for Putin. So he sat out on a Krim annaxation 2.0, unless if Kiev softened up in the last minute. The opposite happend.
Nato expansion and American imperialsim on one hand- and the war Kiev fought on own citizens on the other. Those two.
Commin...stay on topic. what are Putins goals Jac. Show me your inner thoughts on that, not some speculation about how much of a woman beater/hater I might be just cos I love Trumps policies (lol) Will you answer it now?
No. I imagine it more like her with a 22 caliber hidden behind her back asking to make sure, before she shoot him in the legs, and if that don't do the trick aim higher up.
That one is easy to counter: He should not have, cos he would meet no understanding as shown by you and Ken (that is number one) and two: I know the Americans. When they are hellbent they are hellbent. Means war will go on like this and cost will be too high as seen. Basically I said and still think it was a too high risk. Putin was of another opinion. Dosen't mean I don't support his aims, which are peaceful nomather Kens rethoric. He just wants to secure the area, east Ukraine and make it a safe home form Russians who already live there. Same as he did with Krim in 2014. That's it.
You speak like a drama director here. Point is the Rissian minority in the region. The ones you recommend to move before being wiped out. I suspect you wanna first push the Russian army out, then deport these millions of civilians. Am I right? There was 10million or thereabout at the outbreak of the war last year. All these ten million or what is now left of it, pushed back in to mother Russia, that is your solution Ken? I know you pretend they are Ukrainians.
The name calling? Putin worshipper. Just cos I don't see the big bad wolfie you see. Yes the war is horrible. Any war is. But if you see no reasonable motive, well then the monster idea pop in. As fed by western media. I see motive for him, a good one too. Has nothing to do with worshipping. Has to do with refusing the monster framing of him.
This war could have been stopped at any moment by the west. Til this day. Why you think Trump is convinced he can stop it in 24hours? Ahhh...he is delusional too.. oh, I forgot.
No u go warship, but let me do the rational thinking. This war should have been stopped long ago. And the earlier, the more land Ukraine would have kept too. Now it's rather late. If you don't want a nuke in your head, you give Putin what Putin asks at this point. That is the catch 22: Win and get nuked! Even Victoria Nuland knows this by now. So.. less bloodshed please in the ramins of this lost battle. Would be aprechiated. Up with the white flag. It's over.
Aha. So here are the bits Putin wants under the Russian umbrella as far as I can tell: Krim pinensula, Kherson Oblast south of the river, Zaporizhia Oblast south of teh river and the whole of Donetsk Oblast and Luhansk Oblast. He is holding most of it per today. I don't think he intend to go much further west than that, unless to keep bargaining cards on hand.
Well if 1/3 of our inhabitants was Russian and we'd been bullying them for some time we might get visited by an army (literally speaking) of T90's as well. I have asked myself, If Putin rolled in here of some reason (never gonna happen) should we shoot at them or ask questions first. Me I would like to ask some questions. Like "hi what do you want?"
Answer me this practical questin Tiger-moth. If on the 25th of February last year the leadership in Kiev sat down with him and asked just that "what you want?" what do you think Putins answer would have been?
Conrad, I suppose it all boils down to whom you trust to be the better leadership (nicer people). I don't trust Kiev, of more than just one reason. But sure... I notice Eu, nato, Washington and the lot do. Only they don't rally... u see that partnership gains the west as well as the Kiev elite. So, that partnership that cost so much for the Ukrainian, people will go on sadly.
online today!Grandsiozzie Blog Comments (2,949)
RE: Trying to take Trump down
By the way, I just looked up the number of employees in federal government: 2.87 million. lol