Note that the Dr. being interviewed on Sky News is a Professor of Medicine AND a Research Associate in the field of Economics.
It might be presumed he takes a Significantly broader view of the situation than, say, the folks who produced the Harvard Study, who may've reached their conclusions by focusing too much on the timeframe for vaccine development without considering detrimental effects of a prolonged Lockdown.
They essentially arrived at questionable conclusion based on too a narrow view of the subject due to being overly Specialized --a classic example of "an Expert" ...
Someone who knows more & more about less & less until they know everything about nothing. ... As Jenny suggested a few comments above ...
There's a LOT more to be taken away from the Harvard Study (and this blog) than what's been touched upon.
The Topic & Comments are among the most fascinating I've seen on a CS Blog. Even to the selection of the Subject Category (Science). It could easily, and arguably more accurately, be listed under at least One other category.
Weighing the outcome & making "adult decisions" about when the preventative measures inflict more misery -- and Death! -- than than the disease that's being Prevented ...
The interview appears to have been conducted earlier this week. Again -- What's being said is Consistent with information put out by the VA nearly Two Weeks ago.
That "News" was just passed along to me & seems to be a few days old.
I'm thinking it was known in medical circles before it became News ... It's remarkably similar (nearly Spot On!) to information put out through the VA System just over a week ago.
"Old Overholt is said to have been the alcoholic beverage of choice for notables ranging from Old West gunfighters to U.S. presidents, including:
* Gunfighter and gambler Doc Holliday * Old West outlaw Johnny Ringo * U.S. President Abraham Lincoln * Civil War general and U.S. President Ulysses S. Grant * U.S. President John F. Kennedy * U.S. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles "
Make that SEVEN!! Everyone has to Believe in Something and I b'lieve I'll join 'em ...
By Definition -- Those who get covid & survive will have been Selected by a Natural process!! That's NATURAL Selection.
Holing up for up to two years & hoping that a pharma company concocts a vaccine to save one's àss is something a great deal Other than Natural ... ... DUHHH!!
Jim -- Vaccine or not, folks aren't gonna be Locked down for 2 years. It's ridiculous to even Suggest it. The Michigan events demonstrate folks' unwillingness (inability?) to tolerate it for Weeks, let alone Years!
Folks Will take the covid gamble which i described in my response to Palm's comment LONG before then -- Get the immunity or die trying.
To use Palm's phrase, they'll kill the quarantine - even if they risk getting killed doing so.
Honestly -- I'm amazed Harvard allowed it's name/credibility to be associated with such foolishness.
Now ... about the Holy Grail vaccine that's gonna save us. Vaccines are not without risks -- some have proven more troublesome than the diseases they're meant to prevent.
Developing a vaccine in the midst of a pandemic necessarily puts a premium on making such a vaccine available asap -- which Could motivate fast tracking at the expense of rigorous testing for both effectiveness and safety.
Folks getting the vaccine, especially early on, may well be the "lab animals" on which the vaccine will be tested.
Pharmaceutical companies would not be deterred by possible liability suits from rushing a hugely lucrative but marginally tested vaccine to market. U.S. law explicitly shields manufacturers of vaccines from such legal action.
Would I get a Covid vaccine? I don't know. Would I be among the FIRST to get a Covid vaccine? NO!!
A lot of "Stuff" found in meteorites (an asteroid, by definition, can't be on Earth. It would've ceased being an asteroid & become a meteor and then a meteorite) begs the questions, where did they come from? How did they form? When? ...
That was much the motivation for young Mark Twain wanting to catch a deadly plague, Palm. Get the disease & either acquire immunity to it or die trying.
Getting the disease becomes a Roll Of The Dice. When enough folks get so fed up with Lockdown that they're willing to Roll The Dice, they'll, as you phrased it, kill the quarantine.
Some of them will win the roll of the dice -- recover & acquire immunity. Others will then be emboldened to take the gamble.
But, as is suggested in another blog, the notion that Lockdown can be dragged out for YEARS is patently ridiculous.
RE: New report out of Harvard indicates that social distancing may be necessary until 2022 if no vaccine
Note that the Dr. being interviewed on Sky News is a Professor of Medicine AND a Research Associate in the field of Economics.It might be presumed he takes a Significantly broader view of the situation than, say, the folks who produced the Harvard Study, who may've reached their conclusions by focusing too much on the timeframe for vaccine development without considering detrimental effects of a prolonged Lockdown.
They essentially arrived at questionable conclusion based on too a narrow view of the subject due to being overly Specialized --a classic example of "an Expert" ...
Someone who knows more & more about less & less until they know everything about nothing.
... As Jenny suggested a few comments above ...
There's a LOT more to be taken away from the Harvard Study (and this blog) than what's been touched upon.
The Topic & Comments are among the most fascinating I've seen on a CS Blog.
Even to the selection of the Subject Category (Science).
It could easily, and arguably more accurately, be listed under at least One other category.