That is the nail in the coffin so to speak. They come, cause 1.5 billion dollars. We provide food, housing, clothing, school, and jobs. Americans have to fight, picket for living wages, deny assistance for food, housing clothing, and education is a struggle.
Republicans will get an easy win at the polls if there is another candidate than DT.
"If Ghouliani thinks he needs money now, just wait until they see the settlement for Miss Ruby, his lawsuit for exploiting his secretary, and Jack Smith drops the J6th charges on him."
Rudy as Trump and others have already transferred assets, open shell companies, hide their monies, so if there are settlements they have no money.
Rudy took a private plane to Georgia with no money, enough said.
GEORGIA GOP GEARS UP TO REMOVE ATLANTA PROSECUTOR WHO INDICTED DONALD TRUMP Lawmakers invoked a new law that’s supposed to target reform DAs. The real targets are Black Democrats.
If the legal circus of DT can, maybe and Indian or any other can. They will have to play the game and know that they will be a figure head and not really leading this country.
They want the trial to be televised because of transparency. Even if it is televised the denials will claim most of the broad cast was cut/mend/paste/alter. Criminals and supporters never accept defeat, so their fight goes on.
I hope those fools continue to fund a billionaire's legal bill.
Negative Jac. DT did the crime and should go through the legal process like any other criminals. All previous crimes of DT should and will be proceduted. Most people believe the ONLY reason he is a candidate for president is to avoid prosecution.
The filing of section 3 of the 4th amendment is to prohibit DT from being a presidential candidate. It has nothing to do with the legal proceedings.
The Sweep and Force of Section Three University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 172, 2024
126 Pages Posted: William Baude University of Chicago - Law School
Michael Stokes Paulsen University of St. Thomas School of Law
Date Written: August 9, 2023
Abstract Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids holding office by former office holders who then participate in insurrection or rebellion. Because of a range of misperceptions and mistaken assumptions, Section Three’s full legal consequences have not been appreciated or enforced. This article corrects those mistakes by setting forth the full sweep and force of Section Three.
First, Section Three remains an enforceable part of the Constitution, not limited to the Civil War, and not effectively repealed by nineteenth century amnesty legislation. Second, Section Three is self-executing, operating as an immediate disqualification from office, without the need for additional action by Congress. It can and should be enforced by every official, state or federal, who judges qualifications. Third, to the extent of any conflict with prior constitutional rules, Section Three repeals, supersedes, or simply satisfies them. This includes the rules against bills of attainder or ex post facto laws, the Due Process Clause, and even the free speech principles of the First Amendment. Fourth, Section Three covers a broad range of conduct against the authority of the constitutional order, including many instances of indirect participation or support as “aid or comfort.” It covers a broad range of former offices, including the Presidency. And in particular, it disqualifies former President Donald Trump, and potentially many others, because of their participation in the attempted overthrow of the 2020 presidential election.
Most people want the trial to be televise. Either way the supporter will be unhappy and conspiracy theories will continue.
Some conservatives are getting back to the laws and policies that govern our country. Two of them wrote a report that will be published to prevent DT from being a presidential candidate.
The best defense is not to get involve with the judicial system. We have seen how innocent people are criminally charge, the perpetrators get non or short punishments, and some judges get monetary kickbacks.
Illegitimate children are hard to prove (except paternity test) and to be accept (old school).
It takes two to tango, but if women take hold of their bodies and demand respect from men, then these children will not be in these kinds of situations.
Well look at me. Not married, no children. Did it work out by saying no to Men? When I'm playing with my cats I'll let you know.
Friendship4ever Blog Comments (442)
RE: One Guilty. Eighteen more to go...
Trump is the cheese so many will sing like a canary.