The company that did the title search should be held accountable. Also, you might want to contact your mortgage company about this problem as they can exert more pressure on the Title Company.
If you have a mortgage on the house I'm sure the loan company made you buy some sort of Title Insurance. They are the ones to contact. If you paid cash for the house and didn't get Title Insurance then you need a good lawyer.
Once he selects HRC to be his VP he will have signed his own death certificate. Sometime in his 1st year he'll be killed and she will take over. It's the only way she can become POTUS.
I've followed this group for a few years reading tidbits here and there. IMO they're a Bunch of sickos who have been victimizing young boys and young women (via forced young marriage to chosen adult males) for decades. They even victimize the Federal and State Governments in towns they control via welfare/controlling PD's and total corruption.
This is a tough nut to crack since most females are brainwashed to see this as normal and will lie to authorities to protect the perpetrators. e.g unwed mother. Law enforcement infiltration is impossible due to the closed nature of the group. I can understand why state prosecutors have decided to throw book out the window with these groups. Out of frustration and wanting quick results the authorities did the right thing IMO but not a legal one. Sad deal all around because by following the law a group like this will continue to victimize the young for decades more.
The ruling only affects about 25% of the children being held in foster care. Not all the "parents" went to court seeking the return of their "children." No one knows what the State will do since not every kid has been properly identified thru DNA.
Returning these kids to their parents will be a real trick. Many of the kids don't know who their birth parents are. The DNA tests to clear up some of the confusion are still not complete.
For me NASCAR hasn't been interesting for years. Everyone has the same basic engine with a carburetor. The bodies no longer resemble anything on a showroom floor. Back in the '60s and '70s things were much more interesting.
I second the photo album idea. I have kids, grandkids, etc. living all over the country and the few photos I do have of them are very dear to me. Wish one of mine would do that for me.
By JAY REEVES, Associated Press Writer, Tue Dec 11, 2:22 PM ET
Hundreds of thousands of holiday cards and letters thanking wounded American troops for their sacrifice and wishing them well never reach their destination. They are returned to sender or thrown away unopened.
Since the Sept. 11 attacks and the anthrax scare, the Pentagon and the Postal Service have refused to deliver mail addressed simply to "Any Wounded Soldier" for fear terrorists or opponents of the war might send toxic substances or demoralizing messages.
Mail must be addressed to a specific member of the armed forces — a rule that pains some well-meaning Americans this Christmas season.
"Are we going to forget our soldiers because we are running in fear?" Fena D'Ottavio asked. The suburban Chicago woman was using her blog to encourage friends to send mail to unspecified soldiers until she learned of the ban, which she called a sad commentary on society.
Last season, despite the rule, officials say as many as 450,000 pieces of mail not addressed to anyone in particular managed to reach Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington. But they were returned or, if they had no return address, were thrown out altogether, because the hospital lacked the manpower to open and screen all the mail, spokesman Terry Goodman said.
"A lot of this is because of security concerns because it's unsolicited mail that someone is going to have to go through," Goodman said. "Also, being a democratic society, there could be inappropriate mail from someone who, say, doesn't support the war, and then you've got a wounded soldier getting it."
Lt. Col. Kevin Arata, a spokesman with the Army Human Resources Command, said no one tracks the amount of unnamed-soldier mail being returned, so it is impossible to judge the size of the problem.
The busiest part of the holiday season has yet to arrive, but officials said they are receiving far less mail this year addressed simply to "A Recovering American Soldier" or "Any Wounded Soldier."
Candy Roquemore of Austin, Texas, was also promoting the idea of sending cards to wounded soldiers until she found out about the rule. She suggested the ban is an overreaction.
"I think there are some wackos who might do something, so I can understand that. But I think with a Christmas postcard it would be pretty easy to see it doesn't have anthrax in it," Roquemore said.
She added: "I just wanted to say, `Thank you, sorry you're hurt, and happy holidays.'"
USO spokesman John Hanson said that like the military, the nonprofit service organization does not deliver unopened mail to unspecified recipients. He said the USO worries about security as well as hateful messages from war critics.
"We just want to make sure it's not, `Die, baby killer,'" he said. "There are people out there who act irrationally, and we don't want anyone to get a message that would be discouraging."
The USO is one of the organizations the military is encouraging people to support with donations as an alternative to sending cards to unspecified soldiers. The military is also referring people to the American Red Cross and a Defense Department Web site where supporters have posted thousands of messages to troops.
Some groups are offering to forward mail to the troops. Aides to Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., are offering to accept letters, screen them through the U.S. Capitol mail operation, and get them to members of the armed forces.
"We've had about a dozen complaints from constituents about returned mail that they sent to troops," said Steven Boyd, a Sessions spokesman.
Don216 Forum Posts (463)
RE: Obama or McCain?
Boy, what a choice we have. An empty suit and an over the hill vet.