Thankyou young lady I could only go with what i read,they stated there was no physical evidence. Being "me",i would have to consider the fact that those injuries were self inflicted after the event,by head butting against something. Sadly,thats not uncommon. The piece of concrete used would have shown some evidence of the 17yr old having handled it,whether it be DNA,dust fragments on his hands ect. Perhaps how the evidence was gathered or not gathered should be looked at for future reference.
I can only read whats on here,so have i got it right? A 17yr old (race irrelevant),is walking along,and an adult "bouncer",who is armed,follows him. For whatever reason,an altrication takes place,and the unarmed 17yr old is shot dead. The "bouncer" claims he was brutally attacked,but showed no signs of injuries. Forgetting gun laws,race and anything else that can be thrown in just to insult and evade the question,i am baffled with these facts as to how he could be found guilty. Even allowing for the 17yr old being the aggressor,Zimmerman was a "bouncer",not a frail old man,who should have been able to deal with the situation without killing him. I doubt a police officer would have shot him in the same circumstances. Niether had injuries that would suggest a fight? I think for the sake of maintaining a just legal system,the powers that be need to looking at this very seriously.
It would be nice if everyone could have free healthcare,but being realistic,that is impossible. However, here in Spain,and many other countries,those that contribute to the state,get there free health care. What i object to,is in certain countries,doctors and health companies just see it as a licence to print money.It gets to the stage when someone is earning a decent wage,and they still cant afford the care.It can only be greed,nothing else.
I totally agree. There is enough stress without having the fear of being able to afford it. What would happen if you could only afford one visit and the news is bad...can you imagine the stress?
RE: George Zimmerman NOT Guilty!!!! Agree or Disagree?
Thankyou young ladyI could only go with what i read,they stated there was no physical evidence.
Being "me",i would have to consider the fact that those injuries were self inflicted after the event,by head butting against something. Sadly,thats not uncommon.
The piece of concrete used would have shown some evidence of the 17yr old having handled it,whether it be DNA,dust fragments on his hands ect.
Perhaps how the evidence was gathered or not gathered should be looked at for future reference.