Sorry Chris you are mistaken. I am not saying youhave an agenda, you have mistaken yourself for someone else, thats ok no propblem.
I mentioned that how a thread is worded can have a bearing on how the thread can be percieved. I was trying to ensure that future threads are not mistakenly seen as an attack on a Country, or a religion, with hope that there can be a return to harmony on the threads and they are less likely to be hijacked by those who may have a seperate agenda to the thread.
I have highlighted to you where I felt the problem was, if all I was to do was word this thread, then nothing is learnt as the next thread could be equally biased.
For those of you who feel I have an agenda, this is it. That people do not bully, harrass, attack, gang-up, insult, mock, belittle, etc just to cause a fight on the thread. I would have thought those who see it would have had the courage to post and say something rather than leave it and allow it to happen, no matter who is friends with whom, which will only encourage it to keep happening. That is what I done at the start of this thread. No doubt others will have their opinion which they are of course welcome to.....
My apology to you Chris for this post though I felt it needed to be said.
Selective reading seems to be a habit with people in the forums at present. Chris asked me a question, with respect to him I came back in to asnwer him as he posted the thread. What I didn't expect was to be attacked for doing so.
I think it would be healthy for all of us here in the forums if you gave your opinion for the second agenda.
Not unless you both have grown as individuals, if you haven't it will only be a matter of time before everything that happened, will happen again.
It is rare that all the blame could/should be put on one partners shoulders, that would mean then, you both are at fault for something being wrong in that relationship.
Have you taken responsibilty for the things you lack/ed or done wrong and have taken steps to change.
You have given no time frame from when the break happened to when it may ressume.
People as they age change opinions, their character, traits etc, etc
I do believe that some break ups happen because its the wrong time and not the wrong person. Just because you didn't get on when you met at 19 does not mean you wouldn't make a great relationship in your 40's for instance.
Often when relationships end, there is a mix of emotions, anger, betrayal, frustration, etc.....when they are mixed together they will/could easily cause both partners to say or do things they regret later, things that are out of character.
Break ups are painfull, for both parties for often different reasons. Why not when the dust has settled, given a lenght of time for healing to happen and for attitudes to perhaps change, give each other another chance, especially if lessons have clearly been learnt.
No Chris, I have been bullyed, harrassed and attacked enough in this thread. I will not allow someone with a clear agenda to claim I'm arguing. Is it any wonder people no longer feel they can safely post in the forums.
Red = inflammatory remarks due to being captials. Blue = subjective
Just because someone demands it's theirs, does not mean it is, nor does making that demand official.
To keep the thread balanced you could have taken out the biased claim and thus removing the need to include a single Country. That way all Artifacts relating to other Countries could have been including without appearing to attack a single Country. My view is the OP should remain unbiased so being able to view both sides of the argument. The thread should be offered and not preached.
If my view of someone is soley because I have not taken the time and effort to know them, have never met someone like that or have only gotten third hand information, then my view would be based on my ignorance not on that person
That all sounds ok "if" she has taken the time to find herself before I happen along, and if we happen to bump into eachother.....seems to be riddled with if's......odds aren't looking so great!
What I'm saying Chris is to keep a thread balanced and not appear to be an attack on an individuals colour, Race or Religion, care should be taken how a thread is worded.
@Entusiasmo...... I completely agree with you, and I acknowledge English is not Chris's first langauge and there for he may not have intended anything by what he wrote, though my point is really valid for all of us.
I will also acknowlegde all those who don't have English as the first langauge but do make great efforts to post in English
Its reported Elgin found some smashed on the floor to remove the lime. Which is why they were removed by him. Who knows Chris, we certainly wont know the real truth.
I would imagine there is somewhere an Arbitrary Artifact Council that deals with these concerns as both Countries would wish to lay claim and have arguements for.
What wont help here or anywhere else is anyone shouting about past deeds. Your point is valid Chris, but can you take care how a thread is worded
almera03 Forum Posts (3,913)
RE: Past Love
I walk past her each morning when I walk out onto the patio........when I said past, I mean over