breadcrumb serendipity615 Blog

Our lives are part of a grand story (The Hobbit)

It was time. Bilbo Baggins of Bag End needed to leave the Shire. but it wasn't his style to slip away unnoticed under cover of darkness. After all, Bilbo was famous in these parts. A quiet departure just wouldn't do. A party was the thing, a celebration of Bilbo's life on the eve of his disappearance. And what better occasion than his 111th birthday? So, invitations sent and accepted, Bilbo hosted the biggest gala ever seen among the simple folk of Hobbition.


There was much to celebrate. After all, it was quite unusual for a hobbit to live such a long and healthy life as Bilbo Baggins had. For some mysterious reason, he hadn't seemed to age a day since turning fifty. Though time had left its unkind mark on everyone else, an unexplained youthful vigor had remained with Bilbo ever since he returned to Hobbition. Perhaps the adventure of his youthful days had brought with it more than mere wealth.


His quest had certainly given Bilbo Baggins a wonderful story to tell, a story he had been writing in his book.writing Weather many would ever read the book was of little concern to Bilbo. He simply felt the need to put it down so that future generations could know what happened to and through him. Sent off on a grand adventure at the bidding of Gandalf the wizard, Bilbo had acquired a magic ring.

Though he didn't understand it's powers, he knew the ring was of great significance. When worn, it made him invisible, a very useful trick when fighting against giant spiders or freeing jailed warriors.peace And it would be useful again as Bilbo planned to vanish from the Shire in style. cool Which he does, literially.wow At he end of his speech thanking those in attendance and bidding them good-bye, Bilbo Baggins disappears. wow He slips the magic ring on his finger and simply vanishes. He quite enjoys the trick and the animated talk it inspires.conversing

With fun over and Gandalf present to advise and guide, Bilbo knows that the final pages of his chapter are being turned. After he entrusts the Baggins fortune and magic ring to the keeping of his young nephew Frodo, it's time to leave. gotta go He looks forward to the time he might now have to complete his book, a tail that Bilbo hopes will go on "happily ever after to the end of his days." joy But there's no way to know. Past adventures have taught him that scenes of his life are serving a much bigger story than his could ever express. And while Bilbo may be the star of his tail, he is not it's author.

Once upon a time, we understood our lives to be part of a grand story being written by the divine author of history. But a dark yearning for autonomy and nihilistic nudge from Nietzsche pushed us over the edge of sanity.confused God, the omniscient playwright, was declared dead. Now no one knows the plot to the epic drama in which we find ourselves, leaving us with competing small stories but no overarching narrative that frames and explains the seemingly random experiences of life.

Let's face it, we all wish we could write the scenes of our own stories. Like Bilbo Baggins, we want them to be read "and he lived happily ever after to the end of his days." but deep down we know that we are not the authors of the events that shape our lives. Bilbo did not seek, and reluctantly accepted, the invitation to adventure that launched his extraordinary tale of risk and reward. As Gandalf expressed to Bilbo in the closing conversation of The Hobbit, his quest had been orchestrated by another for a greater purpose.


Surely you don't disbelieve the prophecies, because you had a hand in bringing them about yourself? You don't really suppose, do you, that all of your adventures and escapes were managed by mere luck, just for your sole benefit? You are a very fine person, Mr. Baggins, and I am very fond of you; but you are only quite a little fellow in a wide world after all (J.R.R. Tolken, The Hobbit; 303)!



Continued...
Post Comment

Forget love at first sight

Love at first sight is a myth. Perhaps, you can relate to love at first sight, at some level, when you were a teenager. However, in adulthood, when such feelings have the opportunity to develop into something that may be for keeps, you need to understand that there is no such thing as love at first sight.

This does not mean that there is not something at first sight. Nor does it mean that this "something" might not be very, very powerful. It can even have good elements to it. But, it is not love, so you should not treat it that way.comfort


The first take-away value of this fact in dating is this: Do not let your fantasies fool you into thinking you have found something of value just because a person turns your head or makes your heart beat faster.heart beating A fast-beating heart has nothing to do with love or with anything that will last.

The second take-away is this: Just because you do not fall in love at first sight does not mean that the person you meet does not have great value or even lasting potential.bouquet

Hollywood, Madison Ave., fairy tales, movies, and romance novels all add to this confusion. What used to be understood as a fantasy- is now taken as the way love itself works. It is not true, so don't believe it.

Understand that feelings such as those are based on things inside you, not some inherent value of the person you are smitten by.smitten What smites you is totally subjective. The reasons you feel this way about someone could be coming from a lot of sources, and sometimes it is important to find out what those are.


Here are just a few examples of real people who have been smitten at first sight and why that feeling should not be trusted:



- The dainty woman made the man feel stronger and kept him away from his own vulnerability. When he was with her, he felt completed, connected to what he did not have in himself. As time went on, he came to resent the dainty ones he fell in love with, hating their "weakness."


- The intellectual and well-educated man made her feel so "in love." She was drawn to his pedigree and brains. Actually, this represented getting the approval of her own prideful mother, who overvalued such things because her own upbringing did not afford them.

- The gentle man made her feel as though her prince had arrived. She was so in love with his gentle nature. Later, his lack of assertiveness and initiative drove her crazy. The gentleness she was blinded by was actually passivity, but kept her from her fears of aggressive men, such as her father, who had hurt her.


- The successful man made her head swim. His power, accomplishments, and financial standing were so attractive to her. He seemed so strong. Actually, he was driven to succeed because he was unable to connect with anyone; he used his charm to get ahead. After the attraction wore off, he did what disconnected men do: He left her feeling alone. She was so drawn to him because she felt so powerless in the world all by herself. Latching onto him gave her a feeling of security that felt like love.

- Her "ideal" beauty drove him crazy. But when he was with her, he felt empty. She was so invested in her appearance and image, he found little to relate to. His fear of a real woman with real feelings kept him focusing on some romanticized image.


There are many more examples that could be mentioned. Most of them don't end well, and the ones that do end well, it is certainly for other reasons than the fantasized love at first sight. It is because people get beyond the "love at first sight" feeling and get to know and love the real person. Love is built through soul-to-soul connection, shared values, commitment, resolving conflicts, and hurts, tenderness, sacrifice, forgiveness, giving, displays of character, spiritual compatibility, and sharing- things that all have something important in common: time. Love takes time.heart wings



Continued....
Post Comment

The Unfading Beauty of a Person's Character

While you might be attracted to someone's "outsides," what you will experience over the long haul is their "insides."

In other words, many things we can readily see on the outside of a person are "beautiful" to us. Think of some that might draw you to a certain person:


- physical appearance

- intellect

- charm

- humor

- achievements

- people skills

- accomplishments

- talents

- style

- manners

- status

- degrees

- career

- tastes

- spiritual appearance

- economic standing

- power

- fame


These things might initially attract you- and even create excitement. Many of them are wonderful things. Beauty is attractive. Brains are interesting, as someone's accomplishments, career, and education. Learning about people and the fascinating things they have done all make for fun and interesting conversation and interaction. A person who has achieved power in business, politics, entertainment, and education can be fascinating. Hearing the story of what people do and how they do it, and their special talents that got them where they are can be fun- fun fascinating, attractive, interesting, sexy. This is all well and good, and it is part of getting interested in a person.


But getting interested in someone and enjoying him or her in the long haul are two entirely different things. The only things that last are in a person's character. Or, I should say the only thing that makes a relationship able to last is a person's character. You cannot "experience" someone's advanced degrees, for example. You can only experience your admiration for them and be attracted to that quality. But the power of that wears off. Hear that again: The power of all that wears off. But, someone's insides, their character, their makeup is what you are going to experience in a relationship, long term. And past a date or two, that is what you should be looking at very, very hard.

To "desire," to "want," to "open up your heart," and beyond that, "to give yourself" or make a commitment," are things that should only be done with someone of good character.

People who are good for you are going to have a threefold effect over time:


1. You end up closer to God. This person does not take you away from God. This does not mean that he sees himself as a spiritual giant. It means that he shows you more of who God is- God's love and God's nature- as a result of your relationship. He lives God's ways, and you can experience God together.

2. You end up closer to others. You are a more relational person and grow in your capacity to relate to others. You trust more, not less. You are more open, not shut down or kidnapped to just this relationship. You have grown in your relational capacities as a fruit of being with this person.

3. You become more of yourself. Instead of a person causing you to lose parts of yourself to be around her, the relationship helps you find more of who God created you to be. You expand, grow, stretch, and become better and more whole "you," not less of you.


So, hold on to your heart in dating. Learn, experience, and have fun. Only give your heart to someone who deserves it. It is a precious commodity. Good people are a "safe deposit box" for the treasures of your heart. Only store them there, with good characters to whom you can truly trust your treasures. If you do that, not only will your treasures be safe, but their value will grow. That is the person you are looking for, the one whom you can give your heart.



How to get a date worth keeping: Henry Cloud



God bless everyone, at CS!teddybear
Post Comment

God offers us His righteouness in place of our sin

We cannot do it in our own power. We can never become good enough.

"For there is no one righteous, not even one; there is no one who understands, no one who seeks God. all have turned away, they have together become worthless; there is no one who does good, not even one" (Romans 3:10-12).

For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23).

We cannot reach up and become acceptable to God through our own goodness, therefore, we need God to reveal Himself to us, and He did so, in the person of Jesus Christ (John 1:1-14).applause


The bottom line of the gospel (good news) of Jesus Christ is that Christianity is not a religion, it's a relationship.hug


It is not man's attempt to reach up, but it is God reaching down.handshake


All religions of the world say the same thing..."If you ever want to become acceptable to God (to make it into heaven) you must become good." We must become acceptable to God through our own goodness. However, Christianity stands against all the religions of the world, for it says you can never be good enough to be acceptable to God, therefore, Christ had to become goodness for you.peace

For God made him (Jesus Christ) who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God (2 Corinthians 5:21).

Christ who was sinless perfection, became sin for us, (He became the sin offering our sins were placed on Him), so that in Him, we might become acceptable to God, through faith in Jesus Christ alone (Romans 3:21).yay


For Jesus suffered and died (on the cross) to pay a price we could not pay, for our sin, and He offers us forgiveness and eternal life (heaven) as a free gift, to those who are willing to exchange their sin for His righteousness, in receiving Christ as their personal Saviour (John 1:12; Ephesians 2:8-9; Titus 3:4-7).

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life (John 3:16).

Jesus stands at the door of the human heart and He says...Here I am! I stand at the door and knock. if anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in (Revelation 3:20).handshake



God bless everyone at CS! Serendipityteddybear
Post Comment

A Scientific Approach to Past Events

In discussing this topic, I think it is necessary to distinguish between two kinds of science, one dealing with the present world and the other the past. The first is called operation science. It deals with the present and is an empirical science. It's primary principles are observation and repetition. That is, a hypothesis can be tested by measuring it against a recurring pattern of events in nature.

However, there is a scientific approach to the past. It is sometimes called historical science. Archeology and paleontology fit into this category. So does much of astronomy. There is also a discipline known as forensic science. It deals with unobserved and unrepeated events of the past, like a homicide. Since death was unobserved and cannot be repeated, the forensic scientists must reconstruct a comprehensive and consistent picture of it based on the principles of causality and analogy.

This approach to an unrepeated past event is called origin science, as opposed to operation science, which deals with a repeated pattern of events in the present. Since the past, unlike the present, cannot be known by direct observation, it must be inferred by way of the principles of causality and uniformity.


The law of causality simply states that every event has a cause. Nothing can happen without being made to happen by something else. For whatever comes to be, has a cause. There may be events for which we don't know the cause, but we can be sure that there was a cause. The Sound of Music puts it like this..."Nothing comes from nothing; nothing ever could." Any event that occurs must have a cause. handshake

When the law of causality is applied to the origin of the universe, something interesting happens. It leads to a First Cause, which generally is called God. Consider the following:



Whatever has a beginning is caused.


The universe had a beginning.


Therefore, the universe is caused.


According to modern science, there is plenty of evidence pointing to a beginning of the universe. For example, scientifically, the Second Law of Thermodynamics states that in a closed isolated system (such as the whole universe is) the amount of usable energy is decreasing. But if the universe is running down, then it cannot be eternal. It must have had a beginning. So the first principle of origin science, the principle of causality, leads to a First Cause (Creator). By Creator we mean a powerful First Cause of the universe.

But is the "Creator" intelligent or just a Blind Force. Applying the principle of uniformity to the origin of first life provides an answer to our question. For example, we know (from our uniform experience) that coded messages (such as human language) are put together by intelligent beings. But if coded messages need an intelligent cause now, then we can reasonably conclude that they did in the past as well. This is reasoning from analogy, comparing the present with the past. It is called the principle of uniformity (or Analogy). The law of uniformity says that present is the key to understanding the past. If we know how the universe operates now, then we can assume that it has always operated in the same way. If things go up must come down, then it is safe to believe that gravity was also in effect when Gallileo was dropping things from the tower. Lol.

Further, when by analogy with the present it is asked what kind of cause best explains the vast amount of intelligent information (specified complexity) in even a single-cell animal, the answer is: an intelligent Cause. Similarly, when we analyze the great gap between animals and human beings, whose brains contain some 20 million volumes of genetic information (DNA), then it is reasonable to conclude, an intelligent Cause for the first human.professor grin




Come let us reason: Norman Gesiler



God bless!teddybear
Post Comment

Why You Attract the Wrong Type

Being drawn by the wrong type, or attracting the wrong type, is no accident. It is helpful to take ownership of your patterns and find out why. If you do that, you can work through the reasons and change your pattern.


1. Inability to judge character.


Use your head and your values, in addition to your heart, to choose a person to date based on character. Get your head and heart on the same page. Often your heart can fool you when attraction to a person comes out of "only" your feelings. When you are in that mode, you disregard the data that your head is feeding you about the person's character. You can see enough to be cautious or even run the other way, but because of how you "feel," you ignore what your head is telling you.doh



2. Isolation and fear of abandonment.



Choosing dates from a lonely place inside, draws you to people who can't connect, or it makes you so desperate that you connect with anyone who will have you, no matter what they are like, in order to not be alone. A "bad" relationship feels better than none at all. Get connected to some good people outside of dating, and you won't feel so alone and desperate.hug



3. Unbalanced badness.


If you have not faced your "bad parts" and feel as if you have to be "all good," you might be drawn to the "bad boy" or bad girl" type to find completion and to allow someone else to express those bad parts for you. Not facing your own badness keeps you from owning it, with the resulting guilt and fear. Accept your bad parts, get forgiven, and be real. Then you won't need a bad boy or bad girl.angel



4. Merger wishes.


You "merge" with someone to find the parts you do not have. For example, if you are passive, you might be drawn to someone really aggressive and "strong." This gives you a sense of having what you don't have. If you are adaptive, you might be drawn to a controller, who likes to manipulate. If you are cut off and have to be "strong," you might attract needy people with "problems." Merging is an attempt to get missing parts. Develop the side of you that is missing or not being owned. Then you won't have to shop for yourself.grin


5. Fear of confrontation.


If you can't confront, then the person who doesn't like to be confronted will find you. It is like magic.angel2 But people who don't like to be confronted are not only very selfish; they are also in denial, and they are unable to resolve conflict. Not fun people to date.sigh Learn to be assertive and confront appropriately, and they will flee you and the good ones will find you.



6. Romanticizing.


You turn everything into a romantic fantasy and block out reality, so you don't see the reality of the other person you are drooling over.smitten While you are noticing the moonlight, use that light to see the whole person and sit with the reality of who they truly are. Let it settle in, and you might or might not want to be there for long. Vampires only come out at night.laugh



7. Need to rescue.


As a rescuer, you have to find a person with problems. You might as well drive an ambulance and get dates that way. Learn to give to people in service settings instead of in dating. Stop rescuing people from problems, they should be taking responsibility for themselves. Hold people responsible for their own lives, and you won't need to marry a problem.tip hat



8. Familiarity.


You have learned dysfunctional dynamics in a dysfunctional relational setting, such as family you grew up in, and you have gotten programed to operate that way. So, normal person does not fit into your program. It's time to reprogram yourself.handshake Learn healthy relationship patterns in healing settings, such as a small group.hug



To be continued....
Post Comment

Why do we choose unsafe relations?

One of the chief reasons that we pick destructive people is that we are unable to judge character. Many times, when we are choosing important people in our lives, we do not think of character as the main factor. We look at how we feel, to whom we are attracted, or what seems to "pull" us towards a certain person. Our choices are very subjective.

In a sense, matters of the heart are mostly subjective and unconscious, and that's not bad. Soul connections should not be made solely on a rational basis. What a boring life that would be!grin The unconscious part of ourselves has a wisdom of it's own, and in some ways our heart knows what it wants and needs. That is valid.

But God has made us with two sides of our being, the rational and the emotional; when they conflict, we are in trouble. We need to use both reason and emotion in our choosing of people. We get into danger when we ignore our reason, when we find our hearts are attracted to people that our heads "know better" than to choose. At those times, we find ourselves picking people who cannot satisfy our needs and whose character does not measure up to our values.

Our hearts become disconnected from our values and in conflict with our true needs. This disconnection can cause our hearts to become programmed into seeking some sort of sickness inside, and we find relationships that match the sickness of our hearts. For example, many singles find themselves falling head over heels in love with someone who is unloving or irresponsible.

Jesus warns us to face first what is inside our hearts, and only then will we be able to judge others accurately and pick safe relationships (Matthew 7:4-5). Our own character issues blind us to the destructiveness of other people. We must first realize that we have a problem in being able to judge character before we can stop playing the naive victim.


God loves you too much, to see you continually get hurt, by those who do not have your best interest in mind. May we be open, to His wisdom, in guiding our hearts.



Safe People: Dr. Henry Cloud & Dr. John Townsend



God bless everyone, in their search for true love! Serendipity

teddybear
Post Comment

The Inspired Word of God is without error

A common objection to the notion of the Bible being God's inspired Word, is that it was written by men, and men make mistakes. This complaint misses the mark for two reasons.

First, it does not logically follow that because humans were involved in the writing process, the Bible must be in error. Mistakes may be possible, but they're not necessary. To assume error in all human writing is also self-defeating. "The Bible was written by men, and men makes mistakes," would be suspect by the same standards. The fact is, human beings can and do produce writing with no errors. It happens all the time.

Further, the challenge that men make mistakes ignores the main issue- weather or not the Bible was written only by men. The Christian accepts that humans are limited, but denies that man's limitations are significant in this case because inspiration implies that God supersedes man's liabilities ( 2 Timothy 3:16-17: 2 Peter 1:20-21).

After all... "If God exists, then isn't He capable of writing what He wants through imperfect men?" This seems hard to affirm. The notion of an all-powerful God not being able to accomplish such a simple task is ludicrous. If God is capable, then man's limitations are not a limit on God.


The divine inspiration of the Bible automatically solves the problem of human involvement. If God insures the results, then it doesn't matter if men or monkeys do the writing, they still will write exactly what God intends. Since...

"All scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, and instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work (2 Timothy 3:16-17). NKJV


According to this verse: God is the "source" of everything, that is written in His Word.

For inspired Scripture did not originate with human beings, but with God (2 Peter 1:20-21).



Solid Ground: Gregory Koukl



God bless you, members of CS! Serendipityteddybear
Post Comment

The Declaration of Independence

Do you remember how you felt the last time you were wronged-the last time someone took advantage of you, and for their own selfish gain, profited at your expense? Certainly that feeling of being treated unfairly came to you immediately. You knew intuitively that the other person was wrong, and any impartial observer-even a small child-would have agreed with you. You had an undeniable right to be upset, seek justice, and demand restitution from the guilty party.

After you went to that insensitive person and pointed out his error, maybe he realized he was wrong, confessed, and your friendship was restored. On the other hand, maybe the other person was so hardheaded that he refused to admit that he was wrong, and you felt so strongly about his despicable behavior that you ended the friendship. Whatever, finally happened in your situation, one thing was clear to you from the very beginning: You had no trouble distinguishing between what was fair and what was unfair. The instant you understood the situation, no one had to tell you to feel angry or betrayed-your sense of injustice came to you naturally.

That same sense of injustice also came naturally to Thomas Jefferson and our Founding Fathers over two hundred years ago. They, of course, felt wronged by the way the king of Britain had been governing the 13 American colonies. In fact, Jefferson listed in the Declaration of Independence more than 25 of the king's offenses which, in Jefferson's view, had established "an absolute tyranny" over the colonies.

According to Jefferson and other signers of the Declaration, the king should not have taxed people without their representation and consent; he should not have cut off their trade with other parts of the world.; he should not have burned their towns, plundered their seas, and ravaged their coasts, etc. And since the king refused to confess to those charges and change his ways, the colonists felt justified in ending their relationship with Great Britain by declaring their independence.

When you really get down to the heart of the matter, the primary reason the colonists declared their independence was because they believed that the king of Britain was not legislating morally. In other words, the colonists believed that the edits of the king were simply wrong. Unable to tolerate the situation any further, the colonists sought to replace the king's unjust legislation with their own just legislation. Their objection was not about legislating morality-they realized that all laws declare one behavior wrong and another right. Their objection centered around whose morality was being legislated. The colonists believed that the king was legislating the wrong morality -his edits and actions were unfair and violated basic human rights.

When Thomas Jefferson pointed out the alleged violations of the king in the Declaration of Independence, he didn't appeal to the Bible or some holy book to prove that the monarch was wrong. Instead, he recognized that the same sense of fairness that came instinctively to him also came instinctively to the rest of the world. In fact, Jefferson was so confident that the king was obviously at fault that he began the long list of offenses with these words: "To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world." In other words, Jefferson believed that the rest of the world-understanding this same sense of fairness-would agree that the colonists were clearly right and the king was clearly wrong.

Since this sense of fairness came naturally to all people, Jefferson appropriately referred to it as part of the "Laws of Nature." This was also known as "Natural Law," or the Moral Law, or commonly called "Conscience." From the Moral Law, Jefferson observed that the "self-evident," "unalienable Rights" of all people should be protected by a government established by the people. He wrote:
Post Comment

"The Challenge of Philosophy"

Socrates said, "The unexamined life is not worth living." Therein lies the basic and enduring challenge of philosophy. The philosopher (or wise person) continually examines life, it's purposes and presuppositions. He is concerned with critical thinking, and with clear and correct thinking.

Broadly speaking, philosophy deals with life as well as with thought. The philosopher or wise person seeks answers to basic questions about the purpose of life.

In examining the purposes of life, Aristotle said, that philosophy "begins in wonder." Man can never stop asking questions or investigating surroundings.

The question of origin, "Where did I come from?" is as old as man himself. Not all philosophers believe there is a knowable answer to this question, but they recognize that thoughtful men will continue to ask it, nonetheless. The Christian philosopher will point to the Bible, and to the first chapters of Genesis in particular, as an answer to this question from the standpoint of God's revelation.

Men also ask, "Why am I here?" This question of purpose is answered differently by many philosophers. Some admit they have no answer at all, but even so they ask the question. The existential philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre believed he answered the question, by saying that "all of life is an empty bubble on the sea of nothingness" (in other words, all of life is empty and meaningless).moping Many Christians on the other hand, speak of the "abundant life" in which we "glorify God and enjoy Him forever" (ultimate meaning and fulfillment).peace

The final question is one of destiny, "Where am I going" Martin Heidegger believes that man is a "being-unto-death." Others feel we are headed for a final "nothingness." Christians have a greater long range optimism.applause They believe that God's kingdom will come, and His will shall be done "on earth as it is in heaven."yay Bible believing Christians believe "there is a heaven to gain and a hell to shun." They believe in what C.S. Lewis called "the great divorce" of heaven and hell, which will provide eternal bliss for those who say to God, "Thy will be done, "and an eternal woe for those to whom God says, "Thy will be done."

Obviously, not all philosophers come to the same conclusion about life's meaning, but they do ask the same basic questions- and in this sense, they all fulfill Socrates quote- to live the examine life, by "examining" life's purposes.


For the unexamined life is not worth living- Socrates


As a Christian, I would like to add..."The Unexamined faith is not worth believing." For Christians are encouraged "to give a reason for their hope" (1 Peter 3:15). This is part of the great command to love God with all our mind, as well as our heart and soul (Matthew 22:36-37). heart wings



"Come now, let us reason together, says the Lord" (Isaiah 1:18) handshake



Introduction to Philosophy: Norman Gesiler



May God's love and blessing be upon you all, members of CS! Serendipityteddybear
Post Comment

Could the Universe Emerge out of Nothing?

When people face the compelling evidence that the universe began to exist at a definite point in time, a favorite fallback position is that it sprang into existence from nothing at all.laugh This, however, stretches credulity beyond the breaking point.

First, simple logic dictates that nothing comes from nothing.professor "Nothing" is nonexistent and therefore, it lacks the "power to do." Indeed, this "power to do" logically presupposes the existence of a thing that possess that power. Furthermore, something produced by nothing from nothing would logically, have had to create itself. confused But if it created itself, it would have had to exist prior to it's own creation, which means it must both exist and not exist at the same time and in the same way - an obvious contradiction and an utterly illogical conclusion. When the laws of logic are violated like this, reason and communication become meaningless.

Finally, in order for something to exist without being the result of a prior cause, that something must be eternal (something that did not come into being, but always existed). As such, the universe could not emerge out of nothing, but it can exist as an effect of an uncaused eternal First Cause - which is precisely what God is.peace


Before the mountains were born or you brought forth the earth and the world, from everlasting to everlasting you are God (Psalms 90:2).


Creation: Hank Hanegraaff


God's love to all at CS! Serendipityteddybear
Post Comment

How to worship God

"Worship is the most important thing we can do!"


However, worshiping the true God means entering into a personal relationship with Him, through His Son, Jesus Christ (John 14:6).


How to worship God?


Physically:


1. By bowing down our head (Gen. 24:26).

2. By bowing our knees (Ps. 95:6).

3. By lifting our hands (1 Tim. 2:8).

4. Putting hands over our face (Ex. 3:6).

5. Bowing our face (Gen. 17:3).



The bottom line : It's not the position of your body; It is the condition of your heart (Mark 7:6).

You can do all the ritual, and all the forms, but have no worship (2 Tim. 3:2-5). You can have the ritual, but no reality. Have the form, but no faith.


Spiritually:


1. In truth. You cannot worship the true God in other, but the truth (John 4:24; 14:6; 17:17).


Worship God by the Holy Spirit (Phil. 3:3).


1. Worship in our spirit

2. Worship by the power of the Holy Spirit.

3. Worship through Christ the truth.

4. Worship based on God's Word (the Bible) which is the truth.


God is Spirit and can only be worshiped the way He is. God is truth and cannot be worshiped by error.

Some may say, that's too doctrinal! That's too theological! But you can't be too doctrinal or too theological. For true worship is "based" on the truth, and any worship that goes on, that is not in accord with truth, is not true worship.


We also worship God...



a. By praise (150:1).

b. By dedication (1 Sam. 1:28).

c. By prayer (Phil. 4:6; 1 Thess. 5:16-18).

d. By spiritual dance (Ps. 150:4; 2 Sam. 6:12-14).


Note: It was a spiritual but not carnal dance.


Dance when it elevates your spirit, by not gratifying your flesh.



e. We worship God in our offering (Ezekiel 46:2; Rom. 12:1).

God would rather have our self than our substance.


We worship God by beauty (which reflects God's nature). For all beauty reflects God (Ps. 29:2; 27:4). We also worship God...


1. By instruments (Ps. 150:4-5).

2. By singing (PS. 64:6).


In worship: It's not about the experience of God. It's about the God of our experience. The emphasis should be centered in God, not us. It's not centered in our experience, but centered in the God of our experience.


Worship is not based on our feelings, but in God alone.


"Feelings come and feelings go and feelings are deceiving. My warrant is the Word of God, not else is worth believing."


You see, it's not about how you feel. It's about how God is! He is good, He is great, He is awesome. When we acknowledge that, we worship Him."


It's not about feeling but fact.


We can feel good about falsehood.

Or, we can feel bad about truth.


One can feel bad in true worship (Job 1:20).

One can feel good in false worship (Ex. 32:6-7).


True worship is the most important thing you can do.


It's what the angels will do in heaven. And it's what your gonna do in heaven! You want to get a head start to heaven....Worship!





Norman Gesiler: What is Worship?


God love and blessing for those at CS! Serendipityteddybear
Post Comment

This is a list of serendipity615's Blogs. Click here for serendipity615's Blog List

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here