FBI searches Donald Trump’s Mar-A-Lago Resort...
The top story is/was the FBI Raiding Donald Trump’s Mar-A-Lago Resort.News at 11.
I can hardly wait to hear why the FBI would want to visit Mar-a-Lago.
EDIT:
Although the headlines read raid, the FBI conducted a SEARCH with warrant.
I'm amending the title of my blog to correctly reflect this.
Comments (50)
They were shouting obscenities at the live TV cameras while the newscaster was covering the event.
But how sweet should it bear fruit.
The frothing mouths here (one in particular) proclaim civil war as you can see.
I knew something had to happen but like you say it is surprising it did not happen sooner.
It said in the papers that many supporters of Trump were outside with placards ~ ??
Regarding the delay, I think perhaps if charges are going to court, they have to have the evidence very tight as if there is one tiny hole in same the defence team will tear it to shreds. Time will tell.
Amazing how , with social media news gets around the world so fast. I had that this morning.
He was able to modify the limit by taking a gig there as a paid employee and able to stay on site.
After the presidency, I read security is much less than when he was president.
There was also a huge shift in property values at the time that may have dropped some.
The law in question — Section 2071 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code — makes it a crime if someone who has custody of government documents or records “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies or destroys” them.
news link:
The law in question — Section 2071 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code — makes it a crime if someone who has custody of government documents or records “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies or destroys” them.
news link:
A RAID would be anything of interest to an investigation.
Yes?
What if... the ENTIRE event was filmed and not a single switch or chance of adding something that wasn't in the house prior to the search. Everything in clear view, so Trump cannot claim they came in with a box of documents to frame him.
Would YOU be satisfied of their actions?
What if... the ENTIRE event was filmed and not a single switch or chance of adding something that wasn't in the house prior to the search. Everything in clear view, so Trump cannot claim they came in with a box of documents to frame him.
Would YOU be satisfied of their actions?
Pay attention, that question was answered before. See above.
Did you or know of someone being visited by narcotics?
They don't give you time to flush your drugs down the toilet.
Same concept.
Scenario the FBI is trained to avoid:
"Donald, we suspect you have some highly-classified documents in your possession. Is it okay we stop Monday, say between 9 to 11am to pick them up?"
"Are you going to be home then?"
"No? Okay, when is a good time for us to visit?"
Pay attention, that question was answered before. See above.
Did you or know of someone being visited by narcotics?
They don't give you time to flush your drugs down the toilet.
Same concept.
Scenario the FBI is trained to avoid:
"Donald, we suspect you have some highly-classified documents in your possession. Is it okay we stop Monday, say between 9 to 11am to pick them up?
Are you going to be home then?"
"No? Okay, when is a good time for us to visit?"
Lets see what the judge approved and signed to justify the raid on a president’s home.
Lets see what the judge approved and signed to justify the raid on a president’s home.
Everyone else knows the FED's must have obtained a huge amount of evidence prior to the search. There is too much at stake guessing something will 'turn up' in a search.
A friend commented this could provoke a civil war with die-hard Trump supporters who refuse to accept any wrongdoing from the former president.
Everyone else knows the FED's must have obtained a huge amount of evidence prior to the search. There is too much at stake guessing something will 'turn up' in a search.
A friend commented this could provoke a civil war with die-hard Trump supporters who refuse to accept any wrongdoing from the former president.
Fact is the American people want someone in Washington dc that works for them and the dems don't want that to happen.
JMO.
Fact is the American people want someone in Washington dc that works for them and the dems don't want that to happen.
Amazing how conservatives can switch the topic to something unrelated.
We're still on Trump, the FBI and them having good reason to search Mar-a-Lago.
Amazing how conservatives can switch the topic to something unrelated.
We're still on Trump, the FBI and them having good reason to search Mar-a-Lago.
Ok, i wont engage in your hate-filled threads anymore since you dont want to talk about the thread topic.
I just reported the news...
Happy sailing ~~
Someone want to contest that?
Someone want to contest that?
"The current head of the FBI is a Trump appointee and the Federal Judge that issued the subpoena is Republican appointed.
Just remember, it wasn't a raid, it was an execution of a legal approved warrant.
For the record... 'ol sleepy Joe had no clue the FBI was searching Mar-a-Lago. To think he actually has any interest in Trump issues is pretty funny!
Got any more to share?
Got any more to share?