Political Interference
Need I say more?Oh, but I will...
A disgruntled judge going after Trump for Biden and the democrats. Be hard to prove that Trump knew he lost. Another dumbest charge added on to all these other dumbest charges.
It's all politics. They're bringing it onto Trump now all because he's the frontrunner. The demo are scared, that's why they're using their two tier justice system.
What goes around comes around!.
Comments (109)
Presidential campaign in 1991 ...he said;
I WANT TO MAKE AMERIKA GREAT AGAIN. [ !
..along with the magic D mantra...
We need to get the Country moving again
Several female reporters fainted & had to be
Revived with Cocaine. ..
That you refuse to see that says a lot about you!
That you refuse to see that says a lot about you!
If Trump ever get in office hope he will free the remaining ones at once. What a disgrace this charade has been. Whole thing was a setup and Trump said or did nothing wrong at all. Period.
That you refuse to see that says a lot about you!
"If they don't remove that prosecuter the billion will be held back...
I told them, you have until tomorrow noon.." said who?
That you refuse to see that says a lot about you!
How the hell can you say Trump lied his way throughout his life?
All you think you know about Trump is the absolute bovine feces that the media feeds idiots like you and your sort. Reams of credible evidence???
You are a comedian
Trump ain't no politician mister. He is one of us, and he serves us well too. Try to get it.
Trump ain't no politician mister. He is one of us, and he serves us well too. Try to get it.
- he was a bad man before entering office.
I doubt it and I don't care either, he'll have my benefit.
- he is a woman hater, racist perhaps and other bad things.
I don't care, Melania could have left him if things was so bad
-He made a fool of America and hated by his partners now (Eu etc).
I disagree, besides you can't make an omelette without..
No, look at his policies. Decisions in office. What did he try to do?
Grow up basically and don't eat raw all the propaganda.
Cos you know, Fargo, his enemies plant these bad roumors for a reason.
Have you ever stopped for a second to try figure out who is his enemies (within his own country)
and why they're after him?
I wanna quote Supertramp at this stage:
"who are these men of lust, greed and glory-- rip of the masks and let's see"
There is no mask with Trump. Watch his rallies with an open mind,
and you may be enlightened.
Arrite?!
- he was a bad man before entering office.
I doubt it and I don't care either, he'll have my benefit.
- he is a woman hater, racist perhaps and other bad things.
I don't care, Melania could have left him if things was so bad
-He made a fool of America and hated by his partners now (Eu etc).
I disagree, besides you can't make an omelette without..
No, look at his policies. Decisions in office. What did he try to do?
Grow up basically and don't eat raw all the propaganda.
Cos you know, Fargo, his enemies plant these bad roumors for a reason.
Have you ever stopped for a second to try figure out who is his enemies (within his own country)
and why they're after him?
I wanna quote Supertramp at this stage:
"who are these men of lust, greed and glory-- rip of the masks and let's see"
There is no mask with Trump. Watch his rallies with an open mind,
and you may be enlightened.
Arrite?!
Often it's the fear of losing their children, or not being able to protect them from their abuser. Leaving an abusive relatinship is also when women are statistically most at risk of being murdered.
But hey, you passionately support a man who has been found legally liable for one sex offense and has been accused of many, many others. You don't appear to think s*xual offenses are so bad and you don't appear to care about women being violated in that way, either.
Trump devorced before. Never saw Ivanka claim he was bad to her mother.
You're swallowing smear + attempted character assassinations.
I'll remind you even Assange was accused. Political, even you agree on that one.
We don't know what goes on between them. T and M.
Still you conclude. NOW I'll give you this much: as 80% of all NY business men he have narscscssistic (can't spell that one) tendencies. Sure, no biggie.
Barron.. hold on..
Trump devorced before. Never saw Ivanka claim he was bad to her mother.
You're swallowing smear + attempted character assassinations.
I'll remind you even Assange was accused. Political, even you agree on that one.
We don't know what goes on between them. T and M.
Still you conclude. NOW I'll give you this much: as 80% of all NY business men he have narscscssistic (can't spell that one) tendencies. Sure, no biggie.
Barron.. hold on..
Ehm.. I see her (the daughter ) hang out with him baring little to none grudges.
Rather the opposite it seems.
Even the witch of the west Hillary said he has nice children
(when forced to say somehing positive about him).
Basically I see no trouble regarding the man.
So you go cry up some other tree please. I love the Trumps.
Ehm.. I see her (the daughter ) hang out with him baring little to none grudges.
Rather the opposite it seems.
Even the witch of the west Hillary said he has nice children
(when forced to say somehing positive about him).
Basically I see no trouble regarding the man.
So you go cry up some other tree please. I love the Trumps.
What did Trump's ex wife accuse him of?
The accusations have resulted in three instances of litigation: his then-wife Ivana made a rape claim during their 1990 divorce litigation but later recanted that claim; businesswoman Jill Harth sued Trump in 1997 alleging breach of contract while also suing for s*xual harassment but agreed to forfeit her s*xual ...
Says quite much about the alternatives ay'...
U know... when the Demonrats (do you like them?) leave out in the cold a high quality man
with good morals like Robert F Kennedy jr- alarmbells should be souding.
But you... ah no... just anti Trump..
Like that was all you could come up with ay'
Anyhowser. Since it's you, whom I secretly love to at least some degree.. hehe
I can not avoid forgiving you what you don't know, even of this is serious shit in year 2023. Was it 1923 I could maybe try understand but pulling this crap now... no wonder DT is ranking high on polls.
I think you don't understand what lieful crazy forces is at play behind the scenes.
Almost no Europeans can phantom that parts of the judicial system is corrupt as well and in on it-
(either Liverpool or United fans at heart u know..)
This is what (can) happen when there is only two parties, and there is no longer press or public control on the politicians so they create a state within the state, together with the bureaucrats and intel.
Then suddenly came along a man... DJT... in 2015
Disrupt the whole scene, and here we are.
Yes sleep well, alright
Xcuse any spelloes, late here- ceeya
What did Trump's ex wife accuse him of?
The accusations have resulted in three instances of litigation: his then-wife Ivana made a rape claim during their 1990 divorce litigation but later recanted that claim; businesswoman Jill Harth sued Trump in 1997 alleging breach of contract while also suing for s*xual harassment but agreed to forfeit her s*xual ...
Now, what do you think amounts to a lie, Rob?
Donald Trump was found legally liable of s*xual abuse in the E. Jean Carroll case: Two of the many women who have publicly accused him of s*xual misconduct were integral witnesses as their seperate accounts of the pattern of Trump's behaviour were so similar. They also mirror his own account of his behaviour in the Access Hollywod tapes.
It's notable that he wasn't found liable for penetrating Carroll with his p*nis. She had no physical evidence from the retrospective event and the two other witnesses (above) having managed to escape from Trump, could not corroborate that particular pattern of behaviour.
Ivana Trump did indeed recant the allegation that Trump on one occasion raped her. She did not, however, recant that on the same occasion that she felt sexually violated by him. She later said she didn't want her use of lanuage to imply rape in a literal, or criminal sense. Given at the time, Michael Cohen's refutation of the rape allegation was that a wife cannot be raped by her husband (which he also recanted), I don't know what literal, or criminal technicalities Ivana Trump was referring to. None of this detracts from their divorce being granted on the grounds of cruel and inhumane treatment by Donald and that the divorce was uncontested.
In refusing to recognise repeated patterns of Trump's behaviour including s*xual misconduct towards women, you are doing yourself a disservice. I don't understand why this particular man is so important to you.
But hey, I live in the UK. We pressured our Prime Minster (and a number of MP's) into resigning because he broke his own pandemic rules. Had he been found legally liable of s*xual abuse, his feet wouldn't have touched the floor. With a population of 67 million, we have plenty of people to replace hypocritical, abusive and/or criminal politicians with when we catch them in the blatant act.