Can President Trump, following all the
many executive orders of his affirmative action predecesor, B Hussein O,, pull for service evaluation, the broadcast licenses of so-called public media? These broadcasters were started half a century ago, and were meant to be an independent "non-commercial" alternative to commercial broadcast media---and were funded almost entirely by taxpayer dollars. Even the most moonbat viewer of current shows on these channels, if at all fairminded, will see the incredible left wing (now morphing into rabid alt-left Trump bashing) thrust presented. When started, these media showed only a little left bias, consistent with the sentimentalities of then staff, but over time, as with government education workers, university academics, much of foreign tax-funded media (BBC, DW, RFI, others), the content is anything but even handed. Non-commercial? PBS/NPR are loaded with glossy detailed adverts---so much for "viewer funded" myths. Not to forget are the many day long "volunteer assisted" BEGATHONS, touting music and other CD's and DVD's for crass commercial consumption. It's true that the percentage of taxpayer funding has decresed over the years (thanks Mr. Gingrich), but it should long have been zero. Curiously, local NPR (National Proletarian Radio), is mounting an enormous multi milion dollar cash raising effort, apart from the usual begathons, (aimed, allegedly, at operating expenses), for a total operation makeover. Do they sense shifting public scrutiny? Finally, check out the salaries of the suits at these organizations, not the women or peon workers, but the brass, for a shock or two, especially at the Beeb. Truth be told. Aa.
Comments (7)
Muslim agenda
s election, as the right did when the affirmative action community organizer-in- chief got in. But compare the media and other responses on each case. In dramatic fashion, posts point this out. It's merely a cryptic call for self reflection, and attendant balance. Aa.