Blog Comments (3,000+)

RE: Trump Told Australian Billionaire Nuclear Sub Secrets

And again NO, he didn't. He mocked a reporter who so happened to be disabled. He mocked him in the exact same manner he had mocked others previously, for the exact same reason (the reporter had been caught in a lie).

RE: Trump Told Australian Billionaire Nuclear Sub Secrets

Eh NO, he didn't. He was referring to people on both sides who went to protest the issue of statue removals. Trump himself in that speech clarified - lest there be any confusion - that he wasn't referring to Neo Nazis, who he said should be 'condemned completely'. The propagandists leave that part out. Textbook lies by omission. They know full well that Trump wasn't praising Neo Nazis, but deliberately leave out the part proving it, because apparently they believe the lie is more profitable. For absolute shame. It's absolutely disgusting how many of these shameless propagandists operate.

RE: "PLEASE? JOE BAYDEN! "

Hamas are terrorists. Like all Islamists. I think even being in wartime, adequate people will not cut the throats of 40 babies. I completely forgot to say that Islamists love to rape women and children and torture in every possible way. Oh, you are liberals. You will be for the rest of your life bend under them while they have you. You have already achieved that immigrants from the east have more rights than Europeans.

RE: Connecting Singles

Don't take the site too serious. Have some fun with it.

You may meet someone...you never know. Good luck

RE: At least two transgender women will compete in the Miss Universe pageant

I do see them as equal: the way they where born, stay that way.
No angle grinding.

Now go away and sin no more ( :)

RE: At least two transgender women will compete in the Miss Universe pageant

Sadly that's been the case (though there's some indication that's starting to change). The trans lobby (which in many ways is kind of a mixture of a political and medical industry lobby) has largely succeeded in preying upon women's natural inclination to want to protect the vulnerable - to the point where if you don't agree with biological males competing in female sports (or participating in Miss Universe) then you'll immediately be accused of being a 'transphobic bigot'. It really is an inversion of a reality. People demanding you to accept and affirm something you KNOW not to be true. Which doesn't mean by the way that you can't show kindness and have sympathy for someone with gender dysphoria. But it also doesn't mean that we should fundamentally alter the structure of society and competition and abandon common sense in the process. Women fought a long time to gain the rights they now have in The West - to have and enjoy spaces that are exclusively theirs, with a fundamental respect for their unique femininity.

RE: Has Trump made himself ineligible for any elected office?

This isn't at all complicated. Democrats new weapon of choice is lawfare. They've targeted and are trying to jail Trump, all of his lawyers - and pretty much all of those who were at the forefront of challenging the stolen 2020 election. Biden talked about 'healing' and 'uniting', but his administration and his party have done anything but. The violence on January 6 was deeply regrettable. But it's also fair to say it was largely avoidable. Security and intelligence failures, whether deliberate or accidental, contributed greatly to the chaos on that day. Zero evidence exists that Trump called for violence. He encouraged people to march to The Capitol and 'peacefully and patriotically' have their voices heard. There was approximately 2.5 hours of sporadic rioting at The Capitol. 4 people died on the day - all Trump supporters - one shot at point blank range in the neck by a Capitol Police officer. American conservatives are the most armed populace on the planet. And yet not a single firearm was found on a Trump supporter at The Capitol that day. Anyone calling the events of that day an 'insurrection' is just deluding themselves. If you want to see what a real insurrection looks like, research the violent overthrow of government at the Maidan in Ukraine in 2014. It made the clashes at The Capitol look like a picnic.

Weaponizing the courts and the justice system is of course nothing new in history. Would-be tyrants have taken this path constantly. It serves to give an air of 'legitimacy' to their tyranny. Democrats' plan is clear: knowing they are unlikely to beat Trump in 2024 as things stand, they've strategized to prosecute Trump from multiple angles. 'Novel legal theories' is what people are calling the various charges being brought against him. Another way to say it is that Trump is being charged and treated in a manner that no other person - much less a president - has been treated previously.

Investigations and grand juries empanelled in Heavily Democrat districts. Clearly biased prosecutors and attorneys leading the charge. And all timed perfectly to try and impact on the 2024 election. Trump is 100% right when he says it is election interference. Fani Willis in Georgia has proposed just 2 months from now for the trial to take place. A trial with 19 defendants (incl Trump) and likely dozens of witnesses. 2 months is a joke. RICO cases usually take many YEARS before going to trial. And yesterday we find out the case in DC (where residents voted for Biden over Trump by a factor of 17 to 1) was announced for March 4 next year, ONE DAY before the important Super Tuesday Republican primaries. Trump's lawyers have 12 million pages of discovery to get through in that case, in a case that will likely involve 100+ witnesses. Again, it's an absolute joke to bring such a case so soon. It deprives the defendant the ability to make a proper defense.

But we know the play:

Democrats want to get guilty verdicts of Trump ahead of the election. It's as simple as that. They've designed it in a way where that's likely to happen. Partisan judges, in Heavily Democrat districts where the jury pools are made up of a strong majority of people who already really dislike Trump. There's a very good chance that any guilty verdicts would be overturned on appeal. But here's the kicker - any such overturned verdicts wouldn't come 'til AFTER the election.

So now you see it. It's not exactly complicated. The strategy is clear. In many ways it's very similar to how the 'justice' system operated in Stalinist Russia. 'Show me the man and I'll find you the crime'

This is the state of affairs. Many people have been so successfully gaslit into hating Trump - the result of years of media and political attacks against him - that many will now ACCEPT this new 'standard' of 'justice', not realising that if it becomes the norm that ultimately no one is safe. Next time round it may well be someone YOU like or support. Sow the seeds, reap the harvest

RE: Man 64 yr-old man seeking woman, 18-35

I have noticed you have a tendency to pass remarks about other people's profiles. Maybe worry about yourself instead.

RE: TRUMP REFUSES

And that's an interesting reality. The countries that suffered Marxism are no longer Marxist in any way, it's the countries that never suffered under Marxism which are today the woke Stalinists. Cultural Marxism comes from the rich kids of capitalism, what a mong you can be without dying in a gilded space.