At least two transgender women will compete in the Miss Universe pageant
Marina Machete, who was crowned Miss Portugal last week, and Rikkie Valerie Kolle, who became Miss Netherlands in July, will be among the 90 contestants.c*ck in a frock!
This is one of the reasons this world is so messed up. Why cant they organize a transgender pageant for these people? They are insulting people that can give birth and that has the ability to be remembered as loving mothers with a vag!na not a pen!s.
If you're in favor of this screwed up rabbits start your own blog.
Live and let live but is it necessary to indulge in something that you're NOT?
They are enough of these types around to start a pageant of sorts that will please most that endorse this, leave WOMEN'S beauty pageants alone. Why try and force your way into somewhere you don't belong?
All this said with much love to transgender lovies on CS.
Comments (48)
Far better than being an utter c*ck.
Far better than being an utter c*ck.
..best song Ever . ) . One Direction.
.Trumpets. ) de Rulo.
Black Moses. ) Hayes.
.. synthesis. ) Song of Moses. ) Deut. 32.. [ B C .1400 ?
I don't give a monkey's if trans women compete with cis women in a beauty pageant.
It's you fellas who feel like your little space is being invaded.
It's you fellas who feel like you've lost you've dominant position of ogling with (un)gay abandon.
Ah well, tough titties for you...literally.
How come they are not worth the same, even if the engine is pumped up and suspension is the best Opel can come up with..?
It's not an original you see... sorry.
My father was in cort over a car purchase he wanted reversed cos they had chopped the roof off with an angle grinder and called it a cabriolet. Well the judge was a young dumb bimbo and she ruled it had nothing to say as one lying 'expert' said so. Resulting in my father had papers on it was of no importance, it now was a cabriolet.. Still the car was of no value on the market.
No it doesn't look so promising for them trannies even if pc folk try make them hotter than cupcakes straight out of the oven. Better stop encouraging them Jac due to you and your ilk wanna rebel some demon in your heads that isn't real. You're knocking in open doors. Stop trying so hard. Your hurting people more than you're helping them. Trust me. It's like with Joe Biden; If he'd do nothing he'd do a better job.
..its been awhile since I read through the account...but I recall the original Sodomites
.were also democrats !!!
PLU$ ...they were very. VERY EVANGELISTIC .
How come they are not worth the same, even if the engine is pumped up and suspension is the best Opel can come up with..?
It's not an original you see... sorry.
My father was in cort over a car purchase he wanted reversed cos they had chopped the roof off with an angle grinder and called it a cabriolet. Well the judge was a young dumb bimbo and she ruled it had nothing to say as one lying 'expert' said so. Resulting in my father had papers on it was of no importance, it now was a cabriolet.. Still the car was of no value on the market.
No it doesn't look so promising for them trannies even if pc folk try make them hotter than cupcakes straight out of the oven. Better stop encouraging them Jac due to you and your ilk wanna rebel some demon in your heads that isn't real. You're knocking in open doors. Stop trying so hard. Your hurting people more than you're helping them. Trust me. It's like with Joe Biden; If he'd do nothing he'd do a better job.
The most damaging thing is when you evaluate people in terms of 'worth', because you are a person. When you artificially lower some people's worth, it's to make yourself feel better about your own perception of your own worth.
People who don't think in terms of ranking human worth, or can see all human life as having equal worth, tend to see themselves as equally worthy.
You should try it sometime.
It's you fellas who feel like your little space is being invaded.
..its been awhile since I read through the account...but I recall the original Sodomites
.were also democrats !!!
PLU$ ...they were very. VERY EVANGELISTIC .
....or can see all human life as having equal worth,
No angle grinding.
Now go away and sin no more ( :)
WOMEN
WOMEN
D'ya think I should tell them that women, whether cis, or trans, partake in pageants for their own selves, not for middle aged tossers?
Good looking woman there.
It's a very bad example to compare the Thai "lady boys" to women, they themselves will never say they are women.
Same in India and other Asian countries, where there is no need to change the concept of what a woman is to accommodate the desire of some men to behave like women. .
They just accept that men who want to be women are still men.
Why is it so hard for the Western world to leave it at that.
Men are men, women are wonem.
Everything in between is a mental problem.
On the one hand, didn't affect his being impressed by 'her' really astonishing good looks. It would never have gone further anyway. A quick fantasy sequence, cor, phwoar, OH yes, every guy plays out those quick scenarios when faced with sex onna stick, right?
On the other, he was pissed off that he had been 'tricked' into lusting, however innocently, after a bloke.
At the time he laughed and shrugged but it rankled just a little. He'd certainly agree with you that a competition supposed to be about choosing the ultimate in female desirability shouldn't be skewed into the ultimate in deceit.
Men are men, women are wonem.
Everything in between is a mental problem.
On the one hand, didn't affect his being impressed by 'her' really astonishing good looks. It would never have gone further anyway. A quick fantasy sequence, cor, phwoar, OH yes, every guy plays out those quick scenarios when faced with sex onna stick, right?
On the other, he was pissed off that he had been 'tricked' into lusting, however innocently, after a bloke.
At the time he laughed and shrugged but it rankled just a little. He'd certainly agree with you that a competition supposed to be about choosing the ultimate in female desirability shouldn't be skewed into the ultimate in deceit.
born and bread (
Yes I googled it just after posting...wondering if I had also been played... phuu I had not
Now, if I went in for 35 years for armed robbery I'd rather become the wife of a ladyboy than a 2m tall and 1 m wide white dude with a tat saying 'mama' in his red neck under arms ::uhoh:
Tell ypu that mkuch hehe. So consider that ab streched out hand
Not yet...
On the one hand, didn't affect his being impressed by 'her' really astonishing good looks. It would never have gone further anyway. A quick fantasy sequence, cor, phwoar, OH yes, every guy plays out those quick scenarios when faced with sex onna stick, right?
On the other, he was pissed off that he had been 'tricked' into lusting, however innocently, after a bloke.
At the time he laughed and shrugged but it rankled just a little. He'd certainly agree with you that a competition supposed to be about choosing the ultimate in female desirability shouldn't be skewed into the ultimate in deceit.
It's a deceitful thing to do if she's gay, unavailable, or not the assumed fantasy in some other way?
What that has to do with a man pretending to be a woman?
Hi Luke!
It's a deceitful thing to do if she's gay, unavailable, or not the assumed fantasy in some other way?
HER CHOICE.
And what she does with that attention should be her choice too. I'm completely in agreement with that. But let's not pretend men should not glance at, or fantasize about, what is presented to be stared at and fantasized about. Men are genetically coded to react to any female they find desirable. So what?
My point was that when men, or trans-s3xuals, also go to press that fantasy trigger, they are gunning for straight men who have no interest in men, no matter how prettily they can imitate women. So it is deceitful.
We're not talking women who fell prey to men because they had the misfortune to turn them on, sometimes by just being to hand when Mr Sicko got randy. That's a TOTALLY different topic.
HER CHOICE.
And what she does with that attention should be her choice too. I'm completely in agreement with that. But let's not pretend men should not glance at, or fantasize about, what is presented to be stared at and fantasized about. Men are genetically coded to react to any female they find desirable. So what?
My point was that when men, or trans-s3xuals, also go to press that fantasy trigger, they are gunning for straight men who have no interest in men, no matter how prettily they can imitate women. So it is deceitful.
We're not talking women who fell prey to men because they had the misfortune to turn them on, sometimes by just being to hand when Mr Sicko got randy. That's a TOTALLY different topic.
I think women primarily dress for their own pleasure, to feel good about themselves. The number of women over the time period of their lives who specifically dress in let's say mini skirts to target, let's say random and middle-aged men's fantasy trigger is probaby fairly insignificant.
There is an assumption however that exciting random, middle aged men is first and foremost in the minds of those women who wear mini skirts. The reality is likely that those men never cross their minds. Why should that be any different for cis, or trans gender women?
It's not a question of deceit, but simply bad feeling towards someone who they think has somehow spoiled their fantasy. If it's just a fantasy, though, it can be anything the fantisist wants, i.e. of a cis, rather trans gender woman.
If there is an annoyance, there is some muddling between fantasy and reality, some muddling of what the relationship is between the fantasist and the object of their fantasy, some sense of entitlement that the object of their fantasy should somehow meet the fantasist's standards in reality.
There is an almighty arrogance in thinking that a transgender woman has deceived a random bloke in a bar because he wants to fantasise that he is anywhere in her orbit, other than in his mind.
It's not women's responsibility to live up to men's fantasy expectations. It's men's responsibiity to manage their fantasies.
It's not women's responsibility to live up to men's fantasy expectations. It's men's responsibiity to manage their fantasies."
You have obviously never been to Pattaya. Although prostitution in Thailand is illegal, there are estimated to be 27,000 prostitutes working in Pattaya, many in Walking Street. Many of the prostitutes work as bargirls in the bars and clubs along the street. 90% of them are dressed solely for one purpose alone. TO TRIGGER THE FANTASY IN A MALE. This goes for transgender females and where's. They don't hide behind pretences they are there to make MEN happy. Like it or lump it. This is not rocket science.
It has always been a WOMANS responsibility to live up to a man's fantasy expectations cause she knows she is to benefit from her actions both mentally and financially. That's before all this 'woke' utter crap came along. It's mainly the unattractive old hags that cry about it cos they know they're losing out on the deal.
Hi Luke!
Others will no doubt tell me it should have been, and I asked for it, wearing such revealing opinions, but honestly, officer, I thought I had the right to wear any opinion I liked.
And it remains my opinion specifically on the blog topic, which frankly this sidetrip into whether women shouldn't have to worry about men looking at them is not.
The deceit was my word, incidentally. Not my brother's. Ever since, when he's been looking admiringly at anyone gorgeous, his wife has leaned in to whisper 'ladyboy?', it is a family joke.
With respect, this is a little too like pulling Biden into a Trump blog - one can see the connection but it is completely off the point.
I look forward to lively debate when you raise a blog on that topic - the rights of Ms Minding-Her-Own-Business to dress exactly as she wants without fear of assault.
Don't wear her out now, she is used to us low life suckers only...
hope her lid will stay on and energy bars at hand and all + fresh water
Others will no doubt tell me it should have been, and I asked for it, wearing such revealing opinions, but honestly, officer, I thought I had the right to wear any opinion I liked.
And it remains my opinion specifically on the blog topic, which frankly this sidetrip into whether women shouldn't have to worry about men looking at them is not.
The deceit was my word, incidentally. Not my brother's. Ever since, when he's been looking admiringly at anyone gorgeous, his wife has leaned in to whisper 'ladyboy?', it is a family joke.
Yes it is. And if men want to manage their fantasies by looking at lots of gorgeous girls who WANT to be looked at they do, you know, have the right to be - let's say miffed, again, why not - if the gorgeous girls are in fact gorgeous boys.
With respect, this is a little too like pulling Biden into a Trump blog - one can see the connection but it is completely off the point.
I look forward to lively debate when you raise a blog on that topic - the rights of Ms Minding-Her-Own-Business to dress exactly as she wants without fear of assault.
It was my opinion, officer.
WOMEN