Last Post Date Politics Blogs (942)

He knows he is not going to win for any reelection. How convenient for him to express his criticism against a president who seems to be working hard to make this country great again.

What does he do? He sensationalizes his political exit for his self serving interest of becoming the center of attention for his future plans.

How I came up with this idea is, this morning Matt Lauer asked him how he can accept that position that "by exiting you are actually surrendering to the loss of the people whom you claim to serve." He never answered that and I am equally surprise why Matt Lauer didn't pursue for his response to give a direct answer to that question.

My personal analysis is that this man, is not committed to serve the people. This man is not really committed for the greatness of this country. He is shouting for his need for attention and that is all there is to it.

Imagine the corrupt establishment that has been ebbed with political shenanigans that are only interested to empower their personal ambitions as typical politicians. Here comes a President that is void of all those political ambition and he is criticized for not submitting to the collective corruption that has been the trademark of all political establishments, Democrats or Republican.

Way to go Jeff Flake. Use this moment of your defeat to make yourself the center of attention. Where is your commitment to serve the people then if you think that Trump is a bully, not fit for president and you say don't have the heart to be complicit or accommodating this behaviour. Are there people from the same establishment that joins you in your bold submission?

Why didn't you answer Matt Lauer? That would have been my question.

Anyways, good morning fellow political blog posters and I just want to express how I feel about this bozo...

Your opinions are welcomed and I will not tolerate any personal attacks against any poster including me. I will appreciate any opinion on this particular matter, whether you are pro Trump or against him.

Thank you all for reading.

That declaration I have never truly understood. To me, United is (One). Here in the (United States) each state determine their own laws...etc. Maybe I am way off in my thought...The laws should cover The United States of America...the reality is each state has their rules...HOW is that United? Bring your opinions on!

Clashes of ideas

I just read it from New York Post today.

It's interesting, under what motives is my question.

As a support to the USA? Or more like to show case their military power?

Any opinions?

As we approach the 1st anniversary of arguably the most bizarre Prez Election in U.S. history*, is it too early to consider a challenger to Orange Julius?

Some watchers of the political scene are floating the name of Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D Hawaii) as a possible Dem candidate.
I know what most of y'all are thinking - the same thing I thought when I heard this brought up...'Who the hell is Tulsi Gabbard?!'
Wellll...



Tulsi would bring heat to the office.
She's definitely hotter than Canada's HCIC** hunk is hunky
This is of vital national interest if Murka is to retain parity and not allow a 'hottie/hunky gap' to develop with the Canucks...



The Congresswoman comes with her own campaign song...





Seriously, y'all...
Take a look at her.
I'm sayin' here & now she WILL be elected POTUS at some time.
And it may be as soon as three years and a month from now.
Remember. Y'all heard it here first!

* Possible exception - The Election Of '72...that'd be 1872. The Dems nominated no one and it was the first election in which a woman lost.
Yes. Really. Search...

Presidential Election of 1872

Victoria Woodhull



** - HCIC...Head Canuck In Charge

Now Trump says many things...but what do you think he meant with his recent comment about this being the 'calm before the storm'?

The way it seems, turmoil is becoming more and more prevalent....perhaps he knows of something to come?

and

If so, shouldn't he inform his country to prevent it from coming?





or...is is just more empty talk?

For all those who voted in the referendum, knowing what you know now would you still have voted the same way?

Stop living a fantasy. Stop pretending nothing is wrong out there.

Stop believing Governments are our saviors

Stop at once. This is the world the ones before left for us.

In 1904 Teddy Roosevelt told Japan you can take Korea you're superior race

In the 1930s Franklin Roosevelt told Americans, Chinese are Christians they are Americans.

You see?

and British queen Victoria just 24 ordered the bombardment of China to keep the opium.

Is a happy world

The real tragedy, ongoing, long time, is how this latest carnage displays, in bas relief, the severe shortcomings of our legislative system/process. Sure, the NRA is unparalleled in lobbying clout. But it actually is open to better vetting of who can acquire firearms under our precious second amendment. In fact, if you could coral NRA folks and anti gun people in a room where they could hammer out a reasonable plan to keep weapons out of the hands of persons who never should have them, and perhaps even tighten access to clearly military arms, it could produce results. But when these issues enter the dysfunctional political process, nothing gets done. Our legislatures have lower approval ratings than even used car salesmen and lawyers---the latter of which make up much of legislator ranks. Prayers for victims and families. Aa..

the Delano's family like Franklin Delano Roosevelt

made their millions during the opium trade with China.

I mean Delano grandpa was the one.