Last Post Date Politics Blogs (943)

Cloward and Pivens were married sociology professors and political activists who devised this strategy in 1966 at Columbia University where they taught. Basically this is a liberal attempt to bring down capitalism in the US by overloading the welfare system. The original goal was to establish a universal income for all which was supposed to eliminate poverty. The pursuit of this strategy has given us the rise of community organizers like Obama. I would assume the left's love for open borders and massive immigration from third world countries is an attempt to speed up the process. It seems to me like they are succeeding in their attempts to bring anarchy, but I believe there will be unintended consequences which they have not thought through. Watch the short video if you want to understand the concept better. Do you think it is working?

Last night, while everybody was celebrating Valentine’s Day, we received the biggest Valentine’s gift we could ask for. Under immense pressure Jacob Zuma resigned as president of South Africa.

At about 10 PM former president Jacob Zuma addressed the nation, at least the part who was near TV sets, to announce his resignation. In a national television address, Zuma said he had "come to the decision to resign as president of the Republic with immediate effect".

This is rich. He decided to abdicate! He had no choice. He was facing impeachment and a forceful eviction. At least he sort of admitted to that when he said "I have only asked my party to articulate my transgressions and the reason for its immediate instruction that I vacate office." I would have expected that he would know this; the press is full of it. Oh yes, I forgot He had no formal schooling, so reading may be a bit of an obstacle.

In an earlier TV interview on the same day, he said he had received "very unfair" treatment from the party he joined in 1959 and for which he had fought for decades against apartheid. Well, at least this part was more or less true although I don't know if it was unfair

He further expressed his anger over "the manner in which the decision is being implemented... I don't agree as there is no evidence of if I have done anything wrong." Now this is priceless; no evidence. He has a dossier that will put Encyclopaedia Britannica to shame.

There are no jubilations in the streets as was the case in Zimbabwe but we are holding our breaths in quiet optimism. We are not expecting miracles overnight but rather hope that our new president will improve our image and restore some credibility overseas.

And we are speculating about the future of Jacob Zuma. Just like Mugabe, he also tried to get his wife (one of the six) in power to protect him. Will he now, at last, be held accountable for his deeds in the past? We don’t know but if the new president and The ANC won’t interfere, he is going to have big problems. Cyril Ramaphosa has no love for Jacob Zuma but we don’t know what they may be up to in order to preserve unity within the ANC.

All in all, everybody appears to be fairly happy with getting Ramaphosa as our leader and we’re all hoping that he will live up to expectations.

I heard Sen. Flake's speech this morning and I was astounded, he is an old fashioned Republican, he doesn't hide behind lies which are so prevalent now days , he tells it like it is. I would rate his speech along side of
FDR's Pearl Harbor address and Lincoln's Gettysburg address. I would vote any day of the week for Sen. Flake
- and I am a Democrat. When I vote , I vote as an American, the party doesn't tell me how to vote. I believe it is idiotic for a voter - Democrat or Republican - to say , "I have to vote for him/her because they are a member of my party". Neither party has all the answers. Too many voters do not study the candidates, rather they listen to what the candidates spew when running for office. Two parties need to discuss what is necessary for the benefit of our nation and not have the attitude of "It's our way , or no way". studecar

This means a lot for the people of a country who's leader vowed to work on making America First and great again.

He owned the moment. I was so touched and I am sure most Americans have felt the same.

The monumental success he has achieved for so short a time, he is one heck of a great president. In spite of the display of contempt from his pundits, he continues to lead this nation towards greatness as promised.

In my opinion, building the wall for 10 billion is a cheap change compared to the 110 billion of supporting illegal immigrants.

The most effective change he has initiated is that the WORKING citizens are finally bringing more money in their paychecks as a result of tax changes. While I am already receiving my SS as a result of working over 35 years, I am still working for a more financially secured future. This means a lot to me.

Thank you Mr. President for encouraging on bringing back some of the outsourced jobs to this country. Imagine Chrysler to be coming back here from Mexico, that is a very positive move for our economy.

His love and respect for our aging Veterans by hiring more people that provide care they deserve is another big highlight of the speech.

Having been involved in the humanitarian field, this is the closest one to my heart. His commitment to continue on donating to the poor countries of the world. More than any leaders of any nation has done in the history of man. This to me tops all of his success in building a great nation.

this time coming as close as ever to calling it as it is. While qualified- educated -solvent- vetted applicants for US citizenship exist in Haiti (worked there-I know it) and in almost all of dark Africa (I know west Africa), he knows that if he doesn't succeed in his honorable and just (especially to applicants who patiently apply and obey rules) work to reconfigure US immigration policies, mostly by just enforcing existing law, the USA will one day resemble Germany. Female German friends talk of how they now have large dogs for protection just for walking at night in their OWN TOWNS! Sure, even though these places really are mostly s...holes, ---decaying in infrastructure, definitions of corruption, rarely stabily governed, etc., he should better use his words. His use of scatological terms, especially when referring to non whites, may expend his base, but is unnecessary and unhelpful. He should simply say that immigration policies should reflect workforce needs primarily, and other factors much less. He's quite capable of such talk, but often gets taken up in moments, especially if the venue engenders emotional issues close to his heart, and deep love for the USA. Biased media and liberal pols now have learned this, and can push buttons, to their perceived benefit. V-A.

Hawaii was in frenzy about a missile heading their way.

Thank God, it was a false alarm. Imagine the chaos they experienced. Must have been a nerve wracking one.

I'd hate to be on that part of the world yet 50 percent of my relatives live there.

American Chop Suey or Cold War Stockings are political idioms. I have used American Chop Suey in my earlier article and now I am coining another term: Cold War Stockings. It refers to a situation where a strong country goes to aid a weak country besieged by civil and religious conflict. Then without ending the conflict, it abruptly pulls out. An example is: American pullout from Iraq. Now the Russians are following the same road. They have pulled out from Syria leaving the country to succumb to a tragic Jihadic fate. The departure of Russia’s military intervention in Syria is reminiscent of Cold War Stockings. Cold War stockings break Syrian democracy into a broken glass and fertilize the growth of a fanatic Islamic State.

Note:

This is a thread on the forum and I thought it sparks a very good discussion.

So here how it goes. Currently it is of general notion to some that America is invading the middle east for greed. The people fight back and respond in terms of terrorism.

I researched and if it's true, then who are the first terrorists?

Read below and share me your opinions.

Second note : Not a single Muslim in middle east before 600, AD.


"The Ottoman Empire had been expanding into Europe ever since Constantinople fell to the Turks, and even before that. Wherever the Muslim armies went, they plundered cities, took slaves, turned churches into mosques, and converted many thousands of Christian captives to Islam at the point of a sword.

The Sultan’s armies overran Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, and Serbia. They turned Protestant Hungary into a compliant vassal and made war repeatedly on Austria and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The Ottomans had designs on Vienna, since the fall of the city would open the way into the heart of Austria and the rich principalities of southern Germany.

The Turks besiege ViennaHaving failed to take Vienna in the siege of 1529, the Turks prepared a second attempt in 1683. Under the leadership of the Grand Vizier, Pasha Kara Mustafa, and with their Tatar and Malaysian allies, they made their preparations and fought their way towards the capital, overrunning Austrian villages and smaller cities in their path and taking many captives. As the Muslim hordes approached Vienna, King Leopold fled west with most of the citizens, leaving a garrison of about 11,000 soldiers and 5,000 citizen volunteers to hold the city against the Turks. The Viennese razed buildings in the area around the city walls in order to deny the enemy cover, and brought livestock and provender into the city to prepare for a siege.

On July 16th, 1683, the second siege of Vienna began. The tiny garrison in the city was no match for Kara Mustafa’s army of 140,000, but the Grand Vizier decided to starve the city into submission rather than attempt a frontal assault on its defenses."

From historical documents : Siege of Vienna.

Still so glad he's our guy, considering the disasters of an unhealthy/untruthful/hubby in tow Hilary or Crazy Bernie. But while I'd personally like him to tweet less, and get coaching on some of his comments before he makes them, there isn't much he is doing that I disagree with. Till now. Apart from poor timing, and using his member of the Tribe son-in-law as the go to man on Palestine, moving our diplomats to Jerusalen is an error times two. First, Israel's Apartheid history is one of getting an inch, and taking a light year. Just look at the Tewowist Yishuv, the wall and "settlements", not to mention the probable styles and behaviors that led to millennia of persecution, ending with near erradication by Europe's priemier culture. Nuff said. But moreso, Jerusalem shouldn't be "owned" by any one or two states. A real just and lasting peace would somehow recognize that the Holy City belongs to all of us, to the world at large. For visiting, study and worship. Primary administration by the much more effective and less corruptable Jews, in conjunction with rotating large power military overseers, to keep the funny business to a minimum, perhaps---but an independent/international city nevertheless. It's clear that President Trump by this latest action will move things from decades of inertia. Good move in a real estate environment. But not in Palestine. BTW, nice place then to relocate the UN to. JACTESS.org. Salaam-shalom, Aa-VKH.

Can't look anywhere but to see the fake news, biased, alt left media dissing our President, this time for Jerusalem. But speaking of deals, what if he were to lean on the Israelis, who now fully expect to have ALL of the Holy City, to accept a split, whereby East Jerusalem becomes the capital of a new Palastinian state, with it's own US embassy, to match or best the one in West Jerusalem, and this time, the rag tops agreed? Wouldn't be my first choice (JACTESS.org), as I think Jerusalem belongs to the world, but given the decades of war and political inertia, how slick would that be? Yeah, he's a moron. Aa-VKH.