Do u think over population is as dangerous as global warming? (71)
Rumyet: should goverments of all country in the world controll birth rates in their country or UN have to do it?
specially in the poor countries poor families having many children and letting them starve ,grow uneducated and to be dangerous for social life.not mentioning spreading desaese too..but if they had only one child it would be easier to give him/her better life and education.
i think one day it will be very nessesary to control birth rate when earth resurces will not be capable to feed all the ppl on earth.but wouldnt be better to start to do it now,like in China.Du think such law would be against human rights and democracy?
specially in the poor countries poor families having many children and letting them starve ,grow uneducated and to be dangerous for social life.not mentioning spreading desaese too..but if they had only one child it would be easier to give him/her better life and education.
i think one day it will be very nessesary to control birth rate when earth resurces will not be capable to feed all the ppl on earth.but wouldnt be better to start to do it now,like in China.Du think such law would be against human rights and democracy?
you have no ideas about the real resources and how much free energy are available ,
------ This thread is Archived ------
I think it should be controlled altogether. Welfare/government hand outs is a bigger problem than global warming. Why work when you can get a pay raise every 9 months.
China has the right idea. And it is paying off for their country.
China has the right idea. And it is paying off for their country.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Rumyet: should goverments of all country in the world controll birth rates in their country or UN have to do it?
specially in the poor countries poor families having many children and letting them starve ,grow uneducated and to be dangerous for social life.not mentioning spreading desaese too..but if they had only one child it would be easier to give him/her better life and education.
i think one day it will be very nessesary to control birth rate when earth resurces will not be capable to feed all the ppl on earth.but wouldnt be better to start to do it now,like in China.Du think such law would be against human rights and democracy?
specially in the poor countries poor families having many children and letting them starve ,grow uneducated and to be dangerous for social life.not mentioning spreading desaese too..but if they had only one child it would be easier to give him/her better life and education.
i think one day it will be very nessesary to control birth rate when earth resurces will not be capable to feed all the ppl on earth.but wouldnt be better to start to do it now,like in China.Du think such law would be against human rights and democracy?
Interesting ideas Azerbaijan is listed in all the leading studies as one of the worlds poorest countries so do you think it should have started there?
------ This thread is Archived ------
styxy: Interesting ideas Azerbaijan is listed in all the leading studies as one of the worlds poorest countries so do you think it should have started there?
dont make me laugh.we r oil rich country now my friend.and people live better than most countries in the world.
btw.its nothing to do with my country.population is only 9 million here.I m talking about countries who got more than 50 million ppl and ppl really r struggling but still having 7-8 children.so why u take it personal?
------ This thread is Archived ------
swf1950: I think it should be controlled altogether. Welfare/government hand outs is a bigger problem than global warming. Why work when you can get a pay raise every 9 months.
China has the right idea. And it is paying off for their country.
China has the right idea. And it is paying off for their country.
agree with u
------ This thread is Archived ------
Boban1: you have no ideas about the real resources and how much free energy are available ,
yes Bo.mother Earth is rich with resouces.but there r many problems with overpopulation.its a big pollution and other things.do u know how many waste every day people making?and and every 100 yrs population gets 5 times greater.it will be dangerous for earth soon.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Rumyet: dont make me laugh.we r oil rich country now my friend.and people live better than most countries in the world.
btw.its nothing to do with my country.population is only 9 million here.I m talking about countries who got more than 50 million ppl and ppl really r struggling but still having 7-8 children.so why u take it personal?
btw.its nothing to do with my country.population is only 9 million here.I m talking about countries who got more than 50 million ppl and ppl really r struggling but still having 7-8 children.so why u take it personal?
Sorry but all the lists I've seen put you way down close to places like ethiopia(they got oil too). What I can't understand is how you can think it would make any difference. The one country that had a state enforced birth control policy was cchina and they have the worlds biggest population. The reason that the people that you refer to keep breeding is because they know that most of their children will die. Also that any one face with extreme poverty will breed excessively ...it's part of the need to survive that is built into all of us.
------ This thread is Archived ------
styxy: Interesting ideas Azerbaijan is listed in all the leading studies as one of the worlds poorest countries so do you think it should have started there?
seen worse than Azerbaijan with its about 8 million,and an approximate median income of US$ 10'000!
GDP - per capita (PPP):
$11,000 (2010 est.)
country comparison to the world: 103
$10,600 (2009 est.)
$9,700 (2008 est.)
note: data are in 2010 US dollars (CIA Factbook)
------ This thread is Archived ------
styxy: Sorry but all the lists I've seen put you way down close to places like ethiopia(they got oil too). What I can't understand is how you can think it would make any difference. The one country that had a state enforced birth control policy was cchina and they have the worlds biggest population. The reason that the people that you refer to keep breeding is because they know that most of their children will die. Also that any one face with extreme poverty will breed excessively ...it's part of the need to survive that is built into all of us.
thats why i hate wiki.but Azerbaijan is better living and richer than most eastern european countries.not even compare with african countries.and u think if u live in england u can think that u r the richest one.I;ve lived in central london more than 5 years and life is not very different than Azerbaijani life.the difference is u get big vages and pay huge bills.we get less vages and pay less.so dont believe what u read on the internet.and china did that law when they were over billion already.and thanx God they have that law.i can imagine how many billions they would be now if they didnt have that law.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: seen worse than Azerbaijan with its about 8 million,and an approximate median income of US$ 10'000!
GDP - per capita (PPP):
$11,000 (2010 est.)
country comparison to the world: 103
$10,600 (2009 est.)
$9,700 (2008 est.)
note: data are in 2010 US dollars (CIA Factbook)
GDP - per capita (PPP):
$11,000 (2010 est.)
country comparison to the world: 103
$10,600 (2009 est.)
$9,700 (2008 est.)
note: data are in 2010 US dollars (CIA Factbook)
i know,CIA hates us.but what does this number means?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Yep I do think there should be population control. Too many families world wide can't afford to take care of their kids and we are running out of natural resources.
------ This thread is Archived ------
single4ever: Yep I do think there should be population control. Too many families world wide can't afford to take care of their kids and we are running out of natural resources.
i think so ------ This thread is Archived ------
Rumyet: should goverments of all country in the world controll birth rates in their country or UN have to do it?
specially in the poor countries poor families having many children and letting them starve ,grow uneducated and to be dangerous for social life.not mentioning spreading desaese too..but if they had only one child it would be easier to give him/her better life and education.
i think one day it will be very nessesary to control birth rate when earth resurces will not be capable to feed all the ppl on earth.but wouldnt be better to start to do it now,like in China.Du think such law would be against human rights and democracy?
specially in the poor countries poor families having many children and letting them starve ,grow uneducated and to be dangerous for social life.not mentioning spreading desaese too..but if they had only one child it would be easier to give him/her better life and education.
i think one day it will be very nessesary to control birth rate when earth resurces will not be capable to feed all the ppl on earth.but wouldnt be better to start to do it now,like in China.Du think such law would be against human rights and democracy?
I believe nature should dictate who lives, just as it does with all life when it outgrows its means. If we allow man to govern this affair then how do we ensure the better elements remain?
Surely if we manage this then only the rich will survive, or we'll make it an equal affair - either way the survivors won't survive because of their merit. To do this would be actively working against evolution.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Rumyet: i know,CIA hates us.but what does this number means?
says,you're not doing too bad with about US$11'000 average per year per Person!------ This thread is Archived ------
TrueBlue1986: I believe nature should dictate who lives, just as it does with all life when it outgrows its means. If we allow man to govern this affair then how do we ensure the better elements remain?
Surely if we manage this then only the rich will survive, or we'll make it an equal affair - either way the survivors won't survive because of their merit. To do this would be actively working against evolution.
Surely if we manage this then only the rich will survive, or we'll make it an equal affair - either way the survivors won't survive because of their merit. To do this would be actively working against evolution.
i agree that it would be difficult to controll it.but still there must be some ways.and the worse thing is rich and educated families (like europeans)normally dont have many kids.but if u take poor countries where dont have even is not minimum living standarts ppl have many children and i m sorry for those children who dont have even clean water to drink .
------ This thread is Archived ------
slowly we are farting this planet apart
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: says,you're not doing too bad with about US$11'000 average per year per Person!
thanx mate.every year its getting better.but would be good if they didnt spent public billons on stadiums
and 4 billion a year on military
------ This thread is Archived ------
Rumyet this is the best thread you ever created.
Both topics are very important and related to each other. More people = more polution = less resouces for all = faster burning through our natural resourses. Poor countries with high birth rates have lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality, lower standard of living.
I read somewhere that China is ending their 1 child law.
This planet can't support an unlimited number of people. It's too bad so many people don't realize that.
Personally, I wouldn't like to live like the people in sub saharan Africa.
Both topics are very important and related to each other. More people = more polution = less resouces for all = faster burning through our natural resourses. Poor countries with high birth rates have lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality, lower standard of living.
I read somewhere that China is ending their 1 child law.
This planet can't support an unlimited number of people. It's too bad so many people don't realize that.
Personally, I wouldn't like to live like the people in sub saharan Africa.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
Ladies
Are the ads on here as phony as some of the profiles?
What happened to CS while i was away.. (Long time)
One week of the most outrageous GOP leadership!
The GOP Representatives owned by Vladimir Putin
men's perspective towards women
Democrats destroyed America
beauty of the heart
Would you hire this guy - for any job?
makeover
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
3,205 Views
70 Comments
Created: May 2011
Last Viewed: 17 hrs ago
Last Commented: Jun 2011
0 Likes
Related Forums
- Ladies
- Are the ads on here as phony as some of the profiles?
- What happened to CS while i was away.. (Long time)
- One week of the most outrageous GOP leadership!
- The GOP Representatives owned by Vladimir Putin
- men's perspective towards women
- Democrats destroyed America
- beauty of the heart
- Would you hire this guy - for any job?
- makeover
specially in the poor countries poor families having many children and letting them starve ,grow uneducated and to be dangerous for social life.not mentioning spreading desaese too..but if they had only one child it would be easier to give him/her better life and education.
i think one day it will be very nessesary to control birth rate when earth resurces will not be capable to feed all the ppl on earth.but wouldnt be better to start to do it now,like in China.Du think such law would be against human rights and democracy?