47 States Revolt Against Obama Gun Laws ( Archived) (479)

Thanks Joy but I'm lost in all this tyranny talk.

I'm waiting for Tom to give his opinion on the fact that the new gun law requiring a maximum of 10 bullets in a magazine being a dangerous situation for law enforcement.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
Part 1

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

See part 2

I agree!! It's always nice to have someone intelligent who know's what they're talking about around, instead of babbling...lol

Maybe it could be intentional. It sounds like your local LEO's might know how to safely handle and fire a hand gun which they carry on duty. Here it's a different story. Most of our LEOs care about their pensions and have to be forced to practice to be qualified to carry or they lose their jobs.

The police in the UK don't carry firearms at all.

In lieu of the discussion of whether or not the United States is under a Tyranical Government, let us investigate by viewing the Declaration of Independence posted above in 2 parts.

Tyranical charges are described therein so... do we see any of the same behaviors happening today? Is our President acting accordingly?

Take a good look and lets talk about it.

HL

no, they carry clubs, sticks, whatever you want to call them...I would NOT feel safe!!

What i think is that when the law is drafted in Congress....the Law Enforcement Associations....will have made the Congress aware of the 10 round magazine limit them as well. The gloc holds.....17 I think.

So Congress will write a law enforcement exclusion' to the bill. Allowing any weapon issued to law enfrocement to have more than 10 rounds.

But this 10 round mag to me it weakest of all the regs being proposed by the administration. Everyone and anyone saw Platoon, knows that you can tape 3 10 round mag together and have a 30 round weapon.

But I was thinking about this earlier today. Hollywood and the computer game makers.....that have literally made a killing off of killing. They both need to step to plate at this time. Take some responsibility for events like Sandy Cove and the Batman movie attack.

Holmes was not going into a theatre that was showing "Gone with the Wind"...ok a bad choice.....that is pretty brutal as well at the end. He was not going into a theatre that was showing "I Dream of Genie"
But he going into a theatre showing "Batman Darkman Raising" ....the movie when the all American hero Batman goes to the dark side.

Hollywood put the movie out....Hollywood choose the name....Hollywood made the script....Hollywood made the scenes of violence and bloodshed....but Hollywood feels that its hands are clean when a someone acts out movie violence? Because clear as Holmes' orange hair...he was acting out the movie violence.

I'm sorry Gally, but I don't know how your post fits into my question about the new gun law limiting 10 bullets in a magazine even for law enforcement.

I think I'll give up on this question. I asked Tom his opinion and he didn't respond. And I think I've confused you what I'm trying to find out.

Have a good night my friend. I'm heading for the tv