Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia thinks that black people should not be allowed to vote (88)
Ras427: "Jaysus...." Irish, drunk and in need of a tan, or get laid, which ever comes first.
Ahemmmmmmm did u not NOTE his name?? "Godsgift"???
------ This thread is Archived ------
Why is the right to vote in need of a law or act? And why to we distrust the media on Monday yet fully beloved them when it's condusive to our line of thinking on Tuesday? Americans are truly mindless.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Ras427: Why is the right to vote in need of a law or act? And why to we distrust the media on Monday yet fully beloved them when it's condusive to our line of thinking on Tuesday? Americans are truly mindless.
*believe------ This thread is Archived ------
Ras427: “Why is the right to vote in need of a law or act? And why to we distrust the media on Monday yet fully beloved them when it's condusive to our line of thinking on Tuesday? Americans are truly mindless.
So true!
In the US Costitution, there is no absolute right to vote, for anyone, the 13th and 15th Amendments not withstanding,; the language is very ambivalent. Why it was written with such a multitude of interpretations is beyond the comprehension of both the citizens and govt. of the US. Perhaps it would be best to finally put a absolute end to all ambivalence of language and to leave no room for any interpretations except one that will finally be made law for the entire country. Call for a Constitutional Convention and thrash it out once and for all, meaning delegates and citizens do not leave until it is done...IF it is worth doing at all. Might just be easier for some group to take power and announce the US Constitution null and void; appoint a dictator and go on from there. Many, it seems, would prefer that to allowing the current President and the current state of affairs to continue. Sometimes, for a nation to survive, they, the people and/ or the government must risk making it/ themselves over into something else. Dictatorship of one sort or another is a way to finally do this. What is the age old adage...'to save all, one must risk all' is one or one could go with, 'let justice be done and let the Heavens fall', is another. Lots of choices, but one must be made at long last. It'll clear the air....
So true!
In the US Costitution, there is no absolute right to vote, for anyone, the 13th and 15th Amendments not withstanding,; the language is very ambivalent. Why it was written with such a multitude of interpretations is beyond the comprehension of both the citizens and govt. of the US. Perhaps it would be best to finally put a absolute end to all ambivalence of language and to leave no room for any interpretations except one that will finally be made law for the entire country. Call for a Constitutional Convention and thrash it out once and for all, meaning delegates and citizens do not leave until it is done...IF it is worth doing at all. Might just be easier for some group to take power and announce the US Constitution null and void; appoint a dictator and go on from there. Many, it seems, would prefer that to allowing the current President and the current state of affairs to continue. Sometimes, for a nation to survive, they, the people and/ or the government must risk making it/ themselves over into something else. Dictatorship of one sort or another is a way to finally do this. What is the age old adage...'to save all, one must risk all' is one or one could go with, 'let justice be done and let the Heavens fall', is another. Lots of choices, but one must be made at long last. It'll clear the air....
------ This thread is Archived ------
Kattte: Ras427: “Why is the right to vote in need of a law or act? And why to we distrust the media on Monday yet fully beloved them when it's condusive to our line of thinking on Tuesday? Americans are truly mindless.
So true!
In the US Costitution, there is no absolute right to vote, for anyone, the 13th and 15th Amendments not withstanding,; the language is very ambivalent. Why it was written with such a multitude of interpretations is beyond the comprehension of both the citizens and govt. of the US. Perhaps it would be best to finally put a absolute end to all ambivalence of language and to leave no room for any interpretations except one that will finally be made law for the entire country. Call for a Constitutional Convention and thrash it out once and for all, meaning delegates and citizens do not leave until it is done...IF it is worth doing at all. Might just be easier for some group to take power and announce the US Constitution null and void; appoint a dictator and go on from there. Many, it seems, would prefer that to allowing the current President and the current state of affairs to continue. Sometimes, for a nation to survive, they, the people and/ or the government must risk making it/ themselves over into something else. Dictatorship of one sort or another is a way to finally do this. What is the age old adage...'to save all, one must risk all' is one or one could go with, 'let justice be done and let the Heavens fall', is another. Lots of choices, but one must be made at long last. It'll clear the air....
So true!
In the US Costitution, there is no absolute right to vote, for anyone, the 13th and 15th Amendments not withstanding,; the language is very ambivalent. Why it was written with such a multitude of interpretations is beyond the comprehension of both the citizens and govt. of the US. Perhaps it would be best to finally put a absolute end to all ambivalence of language and to leave no room for any interpretations except one that will finally be made law for the entire country. Call for a Constitutional Convention and thrash it out once and for all, meaning delegates and citizens do not leave until it is done...IF it is worth doing at all. Might just be easier for some group to take power and announce the US Constitution null and void; appoint a dictator and go on from there. Many, it seems, would prefer that to allowing the current President and the current state of affairs to continue. Sometimes, for a nation to survive, they, the people and/ or the government must risk making it/ themselves over into something else. Dictatorship of one sort or another is a way to finally do this. What is the age old adage...'to save all, one must risk all' is one or one could go with, 'let justice be done and let the Heavens fall', is another. Lots of choices, but one must be made at long last. It'll clear the air....
Berzelius Windrip?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: Berzelius Windrip?
These people don't read anything longer than a comic strip, besides, the book is long out of print and the writer way out of style.
Act One is already in place with the 'Corpo' power brokers...now, where is the new version of Haik...if any had the nerve...
------ This thread is Archived ------
Much ado about nothing.
He's saying "why should congress be continually passing a temporary measure forcing certain states to give the vote to people who already have the right to vote and who cannot be denied the right to vote under current law. Time to treat all states equally again and let the wound heal instead of reopening it every few years.
He's saying "why should congress be continually passing a temporary measure forcing certain states to give the vote to people who already have the right to vote and who cannot be denied the right to vote under current law. Time to treat all states equally again and let the wound heal instead of reopening it every few years.
------ This thread is Archived ------
bohemianjack: “A fool may be known by six things: anger, without cause; speech, without profit; change, without progress; inquiry, without object; putting trust in a stranger, and mistaking foes for friends” ~Arabian Proverb
Them Arabs are smart.
------ This thread is Archived ------
galrads: ...as far as I'm concerned about voting rights, any individual who doesn't own property shouldn't be allowed to vote. That's the way it was and should be again, here.
Yeah, right.
And those who own more property should naturally have more votes.
One vote per acre sounds about fair, don't you think?
------ This thread is Archived ------
nucyncegene: The US gov has spent so much, the money ran out long ago, now they borrow the money to give away and we just get the bills for the interest on all that debt.
They will always be able to pay their debts and the interest.
At least as long as the paper and ink hold out to print up more monopoly money.
One day we'll all be millionaires.
------ This thread is Archived ------
galrads: I believe the title of this thread is a bit misleading.
as far as I'm concerned about voting rights, any individual who doesn't own property shouldn't be allowed to vote. That's the way it was and should be again, here.
as far as I'm concerned about voting rights, any individual who doesn't own property shouldn't be allowed to vote. That's the way it was and should be again, here.
Houston we got a problem here.
If I had a shared property, how are we going to vote?
And I am talking about family and even so that can be a problem.
Had I had 7 properties do I get to vote 7 times?
------ This thread is Archived ------
RayfromUSA: Yeah, right.
And those who own more property should naturally have more votes.
One vote per acre sounds about fair, don't you think?
And those who own more property should naturally have more votes.
One vote per acre sounds about fair, don't you think?
One vote per acre?
What is the logic behind that?????
(I am gussing you guys own more than one acre of land)
------ This thread is Archived ------
lifeisadream: One vote per acre?
What is the logic behind that?????
(I am gussing you guys own more than one acre of land)
What is the logic behind that?????
(I am gussing you guys own more than one acre of land)
No I was being sarcastic.
I had 5 acres once but now I don't own any land.
But if only landowners could vote it would be feudalism all over again.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Not that I think voting is legitimate anyway.
------ This thread is Archived ------
galrads: I believe the title of this thread is a bit misleading.
as far as I'm concerned about voting rights, any individual who doesn't own property shouldn't be allowed to vote. That's the way it was and should be again, here.
as far as I'm concerned about voting rights, any individual who doesn't own property shouldn't be allowed to vote. That's the way it was and should be again, here.
Please tell me this is a piss-take? Please.
------ This thread is Archived ------
galrads: I believe the title of this thread is a bit misleading.
as far as I'm concerned about voting rights, any individual who doesn't own property shouldn't be allowed to vote. That's the way it was and should be again, here.
as far as I'm concerned about voting rights, any individual who doesn't own property shouldn't be allowed to vote. That's the way it was and should be again, here.
The problem is that this would grant even more power to the boomers - the same generation that created the mess we're in today. In reality, the salvation of the West and its Democracy will not happen until this generation is mercifully silenced by the grave - we want them all away!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Obstinance_Works: The problem is that this would grant even more power to the boomers - the same generation that created the mess we're in today. In reality, the salvation of the West and its Democracy will not happen until this generation is mercifully silenced by the grave - we want them all away!
Yep...boomers and women. god forbid they have any more power than they already have
------ This thread is Archived ------
RayfromUSA: No I was being sarcastic.
I had 5 acres once but now I don't own any land.
But if only landowners could vote it would be feudalism all over again.
I had 5 acres once but now I don't own any land.
But if only landowners could vote it would be feudalism all over again.
Feudalism,Right!
------ This thread is Archived ------
I haven't read everything yet in the thread - so I hope my comments were not a been there done that... I'll read it when I return from work------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
Unions support Democrats!
s*xual skills
The weird and the random facts around the world
The GOP Representatives owned by Vladimir Putin
your favorite topic?
Democrats destroyed America
men's perspective towards women
Kultur-multur
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
the way you look
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
What do you do when you're not here pounding sand?..
“A fool may be known by six things: anger, without cause; speech, without profit; change, without progress; inquiry, without object; putting trust in a stranger, and mistaking foes for friends” ~Arabian Proverb
Usually, whatever I want, when I want.