Why do people try to discredit others - knowing it's made up - stirring trouble? (108)
It all depends - some people have anti-social personalities types and some people are too sensitive and need to acquire some resilience.
Who sets the standards?
Usually it's the weak minded, excessively PC individuals who have the most time to squeal and shout ( as theyhave nothing better to do? ) ... the devil makes works for idle hands scenario ?
Who sets the standards?
Usually it's the weak minded, excessively PC individuals who have the most time to squeal and shout ( as theyhave nothing better to do? ) ... the devil makes works for idle hands scenario ?
------ This thread is Archived ------
oh goody, Snooky created a thread ...after a long long break ...from the forums ,,,maybe she needs a break from being herself ...
find a hobby
find a hobby
------ This thread is Archived ------
HexagonKeySet: It all depends - some people have anti-social personalities types and some people are too sensitive and need to acquire some resilience.
Who sets the standards?
Usually it's the weak minded, excessively PC individuals who have the most time to squeal and shout ( as theyhave nothing better to do? ) ... the devil makes works for idle hands scenario ?
You think you set the standards, from this answer. Men like you want all women to be weak-minded, cannot comply to your ridiculous requirements.Who sets the standards?
Usually it's the weak minded, excessively PC individuals who have the most time to squeal and shout ( as theyhave nothing better to do? ) ... the devil makes works for idle hands scenario ?
------ This thread is Archived ------
smiley963: You think you set the standards, from this answer. Men like you want all women to be weak-minded, cannot comply to your ridiculous requirements.
------ This thread is Archived ------
The chauvinistic person putting all the "thumbs up" on the comments, for all the male participants in this thread:
Please come forward, and show yourself?
Please come forward, and show yourself?
------ This thread is Archived ------
for all those responding negatively in this thread ... eat my shorts and heed the advice...
------ This thread is Archived ------
galrads: for all those responding negatively in this thread ... eat my shorts and heed the advice...
Lol. Very funny.Those who identify with this previous comment, please make you absence known!!!!!!
------ This thread is Archived ------
I don't see this comment as directed towards women, but more explaining why there are some individuals who like to just be mean to others, by putting them down, spreading bad & false rumors, etc.
I agree with the subject of this post, I think it is deplorable that people criticize others and are just plain mean. Usually these types of people, (men, women & some children), have low self esteem and need to do these things just to feel better about themselves. Make them look good to others, when in fact all they are doing is bringing themselves down lower.
If someone does this to you, just ignore the person, who's doing this to you. Don't give them any attention, for that is another thing they want. Just consider the source and move on. Surround yourself with positive, friendly people. In the end you will be the winner... Always!
I agree with the subject of this post, I think it is deplorable that people criticize others and are just plain mean. Usually these types of people, (men, women & some children), have low self esteem and need to do these things just to feel better about themselves. Make them look good to others, when in fact all they are doing is bringing themselves down lower.
If someone does this to you, just ignore the person, who's doing this to you. Don't give them any attention, for that is another thing they want. Just consider the source and move on. Surround yourself with positive, friendly people. In the end you will be the winner... Always!
------ This thread is Archived ------
I was referring to Hexagon's comment, (I thought I hit the "Quote" bullet, sorry). But, also agree with Smiley's post about offensive people. Just clarifying my previous reply. 
------ This thread is Archived ------
HonestlyLoving: I was referring to Hexagon's comment, (I thought I hit the "Quote" bullet, sorry). But, also agree with Smiley's post about offensive people. Just clarifying my previous reply.
If you ignore these people, they just get worse, and after a while people will comment:It must be true, else why is nobody negating it!!!!!!
------ This thread is Archived ------
This is an International Public Forum.
Just want to establish that fact before I continue.
Before any proper discussion begins, definitions need to be equally shared and agreed upon.
Please define:
"Trouble maker" and
"Scammer"
My dictionary shows that they are quite different.
Therefore, the following statement is incorrect.
1. The title is about trying to "discredit people" which is a strategy often employed on a forum. The fallacy often used is called "ad hominem". (Which is a technique frequently seen in your threads.)
2. Then you write about trouble makers and scammers, equating them as the same.
3. Then you go back to how discrediting people is "stupidity" and people "believing it".
4. Then you claim that discrediting a person is equal to defamation of character.
Discrediting people is not defamation of character.
This is an International Public Forum. I have just shown that your argument does not stand.
And my comment does not contain any defamation of character as I have not made any personal attacks on you. I have dissected your argument and shown the errors in your logic.
This is an International Public Forum.
Just want to establish that fact before I continue.
Before any proper discussion begins, definitions need to be equally shared and agreed upon.
Please define:
"Trouble maker" and
"Scammer"
My dictionary shows that they are quite different.
Therefore, the following statement is incorrect.
smiley963: Trouble makers should not be allowed on a public website, as they are the same as scammers.
And consequently, the directive: "not be allowed on a public website" does not have to be followed.smiley963: For some or other reason they feel that it will make the thread more interesting / funny / intelligent / enjoyable!!!! Insulting people in real life, is not allowed, why is it then allowed on a public website, which is world wide?
Most people just shrug it off, as stupidity, but some people actually will start believing it over a period of time. It is called defamation of character, disregarding that it might have been said as a joke, which most of the time it isn't.
Should this type of scamming be allowed?
Most people just shrug it off, as stupidity, but some people actually will start believing it over a period of time. It is called defamation of character, disregarding that it might have been said as a joke, which most of the time it isn't.
Should this type of scamming be allowed?
1. The title is about trying to "discredit people" which is a strategy often employed on a forum. The fallacy often used is called "ad hominem". (Which is a technique frequently seen in your threads.)
2. Then you write about trouble makers and scammers, equating them as the same.
3. Then you go back to how discrediting people is "stupidity" and people "believing it".
4. Then you claim that discrediting a person is equal to defamation of character.
Discrediting people is not defamation of character.
This is an International Public Forum. I have just shown that your argument does not stand.
And my comment does not contain any defamation of character as I have not made any personal attacks on you. I have dissected your argument and shown the errors in your logic.
This is an International Public Forum.
------ This thread is Archived ------
sorry smiley, is the world we live in
nothing to do, especially on the internet
which there's no control
nothing to do, especially on the internet
which there's no control
------ This thread is Archived ------
methuzelah: sorry smiley, is the world we live in
nothing to do, especially on the internet
which there's no control
All websites has some control, just the level differs!!!!!nothing to do, especially on the internet
which there's no control
------ This thread is Archived ------
Kaylana04: This is an International Public Forum.
Just want to establish that fact before I continue.
Before any proper discussion begins, definitions need to be equally shared and agreed upon.
Please define:
"Trouble maker" and
"Scammer"
My dictionary shows that they are quite different.
Therefore, the following statement is incorrect.
And consequently, the directive: "not be allowed on a public website" does not have to be followed.
1. The title is about trying to "discredit people" which is a strategy often employed on a forum. The fallacy often used is called "ad hominem". (Which is a technique frequently seen in your threads.)
2. Then you write about trouble makers and scammers, equating them as the same.
3. Then you go back to how discrediting people is "stupidity" and people "believing it".
4. Then you claim that discrediting a person is equal to defamation of character.
Discrediting people is not defamation of character.
This is an International Public Forum. I have just shown that your argument does not stand.
And my comment does not contain any defamation of character as I have not made any personal attacks on you. I have dissected your argument and shown the errors in your logic.
This is an International Public Forum.
Some people are beyond reasoning with Kaylana. They find any kind of self examination to be an alien concept.Just want to establish that fact before I continue.
Before any proper discussion begins, definitions need to be equally shared and agreed upon.
Please define:
"Trouble maker" and
"Scammer"
My dictionary shows that they are quite different.
Therefore, the following statement is incorrect.
And consequently, the directive: "not be allowed on a public website" does not have to be followed.
1. The title is about trying to "discredit people" which is a strategy often employed on a forum. The fallacy often used is called "ad hominem". (Which is a technique frequently seen in your threads.)
2. Then you write about trouble makers and scammers, equating them as the same.
3. Then you go back to how discrediting people is "stupidity" and people "believing it".
4. Then you claim that discrediting a person is equal to defamation of character.
Discrediting people is not defamation of character.
This is an International Public Forum. I have just shown that your argument does not stand.
And my comment does not contain any defamation of character as I have not made any personal attacks on you. I have dissected your argument and shown the errors in your logic.
This is an International Public Forum.
------ This thread is Archived ------
smiley963: All websites has some control, just the level differs!!!!!
yes is true, the control comes when someonethreats another one, I think.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Discrediting people is not defamation of character.
Finally, a statement I can agree with! Add Defining people to that and we are getting somewhere!
Conclusions come to on my own by the way! Without an Overlord or a Puppet Master!
Finally, a statement I can agree with! Add Defining people to that and we are getting somewhere!
Conclusions come to on my own by the way! Without an Overlord or a Puppet Master!
------ This thread is Archived ------
methuzelah: yes is true, the control comes when someone
threats another one, I think.
What happened to you, I haven't seen you around for days now?threats another one, I think.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Liberal1: Discrediting people is not defamation of character.
Finally, a statement I can agree with! Add Defining people to that and we are getting somewhere!
Conclusions come to on my own by the way! Without an Overlord or a Puppet Master!
Hijacking another one,Sunshine?Finally, a statement I can agree with! Add Defining people to that and we are getting somewhere!
Conclusions come to on my own by the way! Without an Overlord or a Puppet Master!
How quaint!
------ This thread is Archived ------
smiley963: What happened to you, I haven't seen you around for days now?
I'm just dreaming my life away,------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
Have it both ways!
Ladies
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
Who will be The Last Person To Post... VERSION FOUR
Why is this shameful?
One week of the most outrageous GOP leadership!
Unions support Democrats!
Democrats destroyed America
Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
Are the ads on here as phony as some of the profiles?
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
3,897 Views
107 Comments
Created: Mar 2019
Last Viewed: Apr 25
Last Commented: Mar 2019
91 Likes
Last Liked: Mar 2019
81 DisAgrees
Last DisAgreed: Mar 2019
Related Forums
- Have it both ways!
- Ladies
- More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
- Who will be The Last Person To Post... VERSION FOUR
- Why is this shameful?
- One week of the most outrageous GOP leadership!
- Unions support Democrats!
- Democrats destroyed America
- Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
- Are the ads on here as phony as some of the profiles?
For some or other reason they feel that it will make the thread more interesting / funny / intelligent / enjoyable!!!! Insulting people in real life, is not allowed, why is it then allowed on a public website, which is world wide?
Most people just shrug it off, as stupidity, but some people actually will start believing it over a period of time. It is called defamation of character, disregarding that it might have been said as a joke, which most of the time it isn't.
Should this type of scamming be allowed?