Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to
report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
“Early in December, I visited my daughter at college. Spread across her floor was a project she was working on for an elementary education class. The assignment was to prepare a holiday unit for the public school classroom. The project was supposed to include room decorations, a game, songs, and stories. And in order to “fit into” the public school requirements, religious references, including references to Christmas, were forbidden.
I was proud of her exquisite, sparkling work, featuring snowflakes and icicles in shades of silver, white and blue. But there was something very sad about it. It seemed cold and empty compared to the cheery reds, greens and golds of Christmas. The songs were unfamiliar to me. Even “Frosty the Snowman” is taboo, I guess, because it mentions Christmas.
Perhaps I should not be surprised at the way things have progressed. The religious aspects of Christmas have been taboo for awhile. Now even the childhood fun of the Christmas celebration is being stripped from the nation’s public schools.
Legally, the acknowledgement and discussion of Christmas is not forbidden in schools or the public square. But city officials and school administrators across the country are downplaying it for fear of being sued by the ACLU and their “offended” clients.
Christmas vacation is now universally referred to as “winter break” and the Christmas program the “winter concert.” The courts pretty much agree that, in public schools and on government property, manger scenes are required to be combined with secular symbols like reindeer and Christmas trees, or Santas and Frostys.
Christians have kind of come to grips with that. But the secularizers are not satisfied. In recent years, even the non-religious but traditional aspects of Christmas are being challenged.
Town officials are finding themselves in the peculiar position of having to decide whether Christmas—I mean “holiday”—parades can include the presence of Santa Claus. This year, in Fort Collins , Colorado , there was a fight over red and green Christmas lights. A city-appointed task force, which included a member of the Northern Colorado ACLU, proposed the colours be banned. (An overwhelming outcry by citizens convinced the city council not to “mess with tradition.”) This year, the Seattle airport lost its Christmas trees to winter displays.
In the name of inclusiveness, symbols that have nothing to do with the Christian aspects of Christmas are banned from the public square, leaving it cold. You have to wonder: Do people other than ACLU lawyers really want these changes? The answer to that question appeared last month in the form of a survey released by Rasmussen Reports. One thousand adults were polled, and 67 percent said they prefer that retailers use “Merry Christmas” instead of “Happy Holidays” in their seasonal advertising. Most people are weary of this politically correct nonsense.
As if it were not depressing enough to observe the secularization of Christmas, we also get to live through another attempt by atheist Michael Newdow to strip God from the Pledge of Allegiance. He’s also demanding that “under God” be removed from our national motto. Newdow was back in federal court on December 4, in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the same court that affirmed his challenge to the pledge in 2002.
(con't)