This is a bit of an aside, but I have a question for Carl. Carl, you state in your profile that you want a non-smoker and that smoking is a deal breaker. However, you also state that you are only seeking: "talk, email, pen pal". So, if all you want is someone to 'cyber' with....why do you care if they smoke or not?
i used to smoke for about 16 years,but then i quit and i'm a nonsmoker for about 16 years too. and i have complaints for both sides. my personal problem with smokers is that sometimes they don't want to realize that smoke does bother nonsmokers,it's not just pure wish to annoy them,it does affect our breathing if they light a cigarette in a closed small space. my personal problem with nonsmokers is that sometimes,some of them,go way too far in their critics and judging the smokers. it's not only very obnoxious,but also counterproductive. if i were still smoking and someone addressed me about it the way Carl does,i'd fight my right to smoke till the last breath.
leo1shay: Attack smokers all you want... what about alcoholics? what about druggies? what about top topic this month - the depressed .... all sickness ... addictions... has nothing to do with being pathetic.... or being named names or being weak.....
Carl you are a very negative opinionated person.... so you are 100% healthy... you have never done anything " un - healthy" or wrong or mistake......... oh your so perfect!!!!!!! your comments make me
Don't go throwin' up around here little lady, he's likely to rub your nose in it and call you a bulimic no-hoper
Oh we shouldn't give Carl to much of a hard time as he is probably getting a lot out of chatting with us. I'm sure he means well and i for one am not bothered is a non smoker joins the conversation, I wont complain about that Carl you just feel right at home in this thread us smoker really don't mind non smokers on here
shay28: I never smoke... but i like seeing a man smoking. But not the chain-smoking type. It seems the smoking makes a man more masculine. Weird huh, i know.
I think I've just found your ultimate match-o man ......
---- IMAGE REMOVED because photobucket.com no longer allows embedded images ----
ive quit smoking twice for over a yr at a time , and if i wanted i could stop tomorrow, thing is i dont want too i enjoy my cigs i have at least 4 a day and dont see me stoping that for anything or anyone
gypseyblue: ive quit smoking twice for over a yr at a time , and if i wanted i could stop tomorrow, thing is i dont want too i enjoy my cigs i have at least 4 a day and dont see me stoping that for anything or anyone
some might die younger a lot dont , my dad smoked from the age of 9 till 65 , he stopped because of the cost of cigs in the uk (he worked in germany and bought his cigs in poland)he refused to pay so he stoped no pills no patches no nothing just said im not buying one more pk and he never did ,
I did not like to smoke when I did. That is why I gave up. It was hard for a while, nearly year, I would say. Nicotine must be more addictive than alcohol, because few people are able to smoke only when they chose. Most get addicted and smoke one after other. I was certainly addicted.
But there are people who consciously like to smoke. Some of them are addicted and some not. I don't mind as long as they don't disturb others. I would not tolerate a man smoking inside house, no way. But if he goes out, that's fine with me.
Carl96190: I detest smoking and smokers. The psychological profile of a smoker is unflattering and they are obviously an idiot who wants (subconsciously) to die a slow and painful death.
...............What is striking in the bulk of the material on smoking motivation is the emergence of a profile of the nonsmoker. Some characteristics of the nonsmoker crystallized more definitively from these studies than those of the smoker, the original subject of investigation. This is not to say that the nonsmokers share a single personality type or display an exclusive set of identifying characteristics. Rather, the profile is to be viewed as a group tendency on the part of the nonsmokers to exhibit particular traits more frequently.
The consensus of various studies indicates the nonsmoker to be of middle-class origin rather than in either the upper or lower classes, reflecting the mark of middle-class respectability and the persistence of the Puritanical trait. Seemingly, he considers smoking one of the small vices to which the flesh is heir, is often pious and a devout churchgoer, and is frequently an abstainer from alcohol. While the nonsmoker tends to be dependable, purposeful, hard-working, stable in marriage, and quietly progressive in general outlook, he is less gregarious and sociable than the smoker. He is described as being more often inner-directed or an introvert, and is, accordingly, immoderately preoccupied with his own thought processes and other internal states. More rigid in personality than the smoker, the nonsmoker is attracted to scientific rather than business studies, and during his adolescence he tends to be more seriously absorbed in his studies and academic achievements...........
...................Notable distinctions between smokers and nonsmokers apparently exist in the realm of psychological and personality features. Several studies stress the greater degree of extroversion of the smokers. They are described as being more energetic, restless, and more externally oriented than the nonsmokers. Possessing more "neurotic" traits, smokers tend to show more signs of psychological tension and psychosomatic symptoms than do the nonsmokers. In the words of one researcher, "the group of smokers appears to contain more of the men who are energetic, searching for aims and purposes, verbal, and perhaps, although less stable, more interesting."..................
.............Despite the inherent limitations in the research done thus far, it has become increasingly clear that smoking, the form of smoking adopted, and abstention from smoking are structured reflections of very complex forces, innate and environmental, in constant counterplay. Rather than a superficial habit overlaid indiscriminately upon various persons, smoking appears to be a response to a wide variety of personality and behavioral characteristics which have their origin, in part, in the biological or genetic makeup of the individual.
This opens up important and far-reaching implications for the highly controversial subject of the association of smoking and lung cancer.............................
stringman: thanks EW very interesting.in my area there seems to be a lot of cancer . could be due to factories and chemical valley we call SARNIA.
hiya stringman could be... Sarnia was on television last summer as having the worst air in Canada.... this is just one of the many articles on it online.
thanks Jono yes we new this has been going on for years and suspected this. I only live 36 miles from SARNIA, when you travel there you can smell the chemicals in the air and gas refineries giving off there smell.
stringman: thanks Jono yes we new this has been going on for years and suspected this. I only live 36 miles from SARNIA, when you travel there you can smell the chemicals in the air and gas refineries giving off there smell.
such a pity....really. i really looked into the area last summer as i was thinking about moving there. i have a very dear friend from 'wally's burg' (grin) and he had mentioned to me.
you know, i lived in cincinnati for years..and left there with many allergies i got while there. it's a shame that big business sees us as soooo expendable.
it is a nice area but i don't think that i would want to live there. as long as big companies are making money that's all that matters to them. and the gov. is not going to do anything either.
Carl96190: You have to be well aware of the health results of smoking (heart disease, emphysema, lung cancer and a shopping list of other diseases. Yet, you continue to suck on the cancer sticks and inflict your carcinogenic waste on those around you. People who have never smoked die because of the waste product of smoking that was inflicted upon them by smokers. Can you understand why it would be reasonable to say that smokers are not the sharpest tools in the shed? Can you understand why it would be reasonable to say that smokers do not give a damn about the welfare of anyone else, because if they did they would not smoke around other people?
ah come down off ur high horse man, ppl die every single day 4 numerous reasons...and ta label some1 thick or stupid, or less intelligent than non smokers is a bit thick in itself...think about it
Carl96190: You must have an interesting impression of Bushido and karate. We are not Buddhist monks. Nor do we let stupidity go unchallenged. I have never in my life been the first to hit someone, but once they make the first move everything that follows is self defence.
never the 1st to hit? but 1st to throw an insult and put some1 down?? another doh 4 u sir!!!
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »