Davlos64: The vaccine can only guarantee about 6 months of immunity, all be it not 100% , which is the same immunity as someone who had the virus , so it would be pointless having the jab . My point is , if the vaccine was so effective , why don’t governments let those who’ve had both jabs back into society to resume their normal lives ?
Certainly, I encourage you to take the vaccine if it makes you feel better, but know this: it's not a vaccine.
Misnaming it as a vaccine is a big win for Big Pharma corporations hoping to sell more of their products, but thousands of the world’s top medical doctors and scientists, including virologists, immunologists, pharmacologists and microbiologists, such as the ten listed below, are warning that it’s a big risk to the rest of us because inserting manipulated mRNA code into our cells will replicate the new instructions into every cell of our body so that when we later encounter a new virus, instead of fighting it in just one part of our body like we would normally do, such as an upper respiratory virus, all parts of our body will start producing antigenic substances at the same time, thereby causing our immune system to be overwhelmed and continue being overwhelmed until all our strength is depleted, ultimately causing death.
None of the vaccines claim to be 100% effective because individuals react differently.
Vaccination is not full protection from becoming infected, but if some people do become infected, they are less likely to be hospitalised, have long term damage/health issues, or die.
If vaccinated people do become infected they are more likely to have mild symptoms, or be asymptomatic. Asymptomatic people are more likely to spread the disease because they don't know to quarantine.
If the disease is spread, particularly part way through reaching a herd immunity level of vaccination, there is a greater likelihood of mutations flourishing. With fewer hosts, the mutations that are more successful are the ones which propagate.
So, post-vaccination, we not only continue to protect ourselves for the time period it takes for the vaccination to be effective and reduce the chance of our own death, but we protect others who are not yet vaccinated.
It will be necessary to wear masks, socially distance and continue with precautions until enough peple are vaccinated for there to be herd immunity.
Spreading disinformation and refusing vaccination will hold us back from reaching that goal where we can dispense with precautions.
jac_the_gripper: Spreading disinformation and refusing vaccination will hold us back from reaching that goal where we can dispense with precautions.
You are a good sheep.
You might want to check the definition of disinformation.
Meanwhile, from those who actually know:
This is not a vaccine
In previous clinical trials since the 1960’s attempts to vaccinate against RSV, Dengue, SARS and MERS, the studies each failed during the animal phase. Cats, ferrets, monkeys, and rabbits each and every time experienced Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), also known as pathogenic priming or a cytokine storm. This occurs when the immune system creates an uncontrolled and overwhelming inflammatory response upon being confronted with the pathogen in the real world, and the outcome, tragically, is death.
You might want to check the definition of disinformation.
Meanwhile, from those who actually know:
This is not a vaccine
In previous clinical trials since the 1960’s attempts to vaccinate against RSV, Dengue, SARS and MERS, the studies each failed during the animal phase. Cats, ferrets, monkeys, and rabbits each and every time experienced Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), also known as pathogenic priming or a cytokine storm. This occurs when the immune system creates an uncontrolled and overwhelming inflammatory response upon being confronted with the pathogen in the real world, and the outcome, tragically, is death.
jac_the_gripper: I explained how it works and you're still asking the same question.
Why is that?
I've had my first shot of the Oxford. The risk of that one is blood clots in people with low platelet counts.
I'm not dead yet.
Well for one, you are no authority.
Secondly, once the mRNA causes changes to your body, upon secondary exposure is when the negative effects take place, e.g.:
Cats, ferrets, monkeys, and rabbits each and every time experienced Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), also known as pathogenic priming or a cytokine storm. This occurs when the immune system creates an uncontrolled and overwhelming inflammatory response upon being confronted with the pathogen in the real world...
I don't know why you are concerned with posting information from scientists and medical researchers. Certainly, I am not preventing you from getting the injection. I am just providing information you should have before you do so. It's all part of informed consent.
Pfiizer, Moderna, Dr Anthony Fauci and Dr Soumya Swaminathan, the WHO’s chief scientist, have made it abundantly clear that the novel mRNA strand entering the cell is not intended to stop transmission but rather as a treatment.
So, you see, they call it a vaccine, but it's not a vaccine, and it won't give you (or anyone else) immunity.
Secondly, once the mRNA causes changes to your body, upon secondary exposure is when the negative effects take place, e.g.:
Cats, ferrets, monkeys, and rabbits each and every time experienced Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), also known as pathogenic priming or a cytokine storm. This occurs when the immune system creates an uncontrolled and overwhelming inflammatory response upon being confronted with the pathogen in the real world...
I don't know why you are concerned with posting information from scientists and medical researchers. Certainly, I am not preventing you from getting the injection. I am just providing information you should have before you do so. It's all part of informed consent.
Pfiizer, Moderna, Dr Anthony Fauci and Dr Soumya Swaminathan, the WHO’s chief scientist, have made it abundantly clear that the novel mRNA strand entering the cell is not intended to stop transmission but rather as a treatment.
So, you see, they call it a vaccine, but it's not a vaccine, and it won't give you (or anyone else) immunity.
Secondly, once the mRNA causes changes to your body, upon secondary exposure is when the negative effects take place, e.g.:
Cats, ferrets, monkeys, and rabbits each and every time experienced Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), also known as pathogenic priming or a cytokine storm. This occurs when the immune system creates an uncontrolled and overwhelming inflammatory response upon being confronted with the pathogen in the real world...
I don't know why you are concerned with posting information from scientists and medical researchers. Certainly, I am not preventing you from getting the injection. I am just providing information you should have before you do so. It's all part of informed consent.
Pfiizer, Moderna, Dr Anthony Fauci and Dr Soumya Swaminathan, the WHO’s chief scientist, have made it abundantly clear that the novel mRNA strand entering the cell is not intended to stop transmission but rather as a treatment.
So, you see, they call it a vaccine, but it's not a vaccine, and it won't give you (or anyone else) immunity.
But knock yourself out.
They are trying to get you by the balls in a grip so tight, you can't refuse to take the shot.. I guess I'll have to take it when it is required to buy essentials for life's needs.. That's where they are going with this...
jac_the_gripper: It seems you're not authority, either.
The Oxford isn't a mRNA vaccine.
The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine is based on the virus’s genetic instructions for building the spike protein. But unlike the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, which store the instructions in single-stranded RNA, the Oxford vaccine uses double-stranded DNA.
OTTAWA — Concerns about vaccine safety emerged again Tuesday, as Canada reported its first case of vaccine-induced blood clots linked to Oxford-AstraZeneca, and the United States put the brakes on the Johnson & Johnson vaccine following six reports of blood clots there.
The Chi-Coms, and their US-Canadian partners, have been playing with Covid-type viruses since at least 2015, with Fauci diverting millions in NIH function to Wuhan BSL-4 labs in Wuhan to work on 'gain-function' which was forbidden in the USA. That is, if you could take an infection borne by animals and allow it now to infect humans.
Look at the timing of the release. In late 2019, Trump had finally backed the ChiComs into opening their market and into a more balanced trade relationship called PHASE 1.
Then the outbreak (the millions of Wuhan residents were allowed to travel internationally, but not to the rest of China). The main ChiCom BioWeapons lab is located near the city of Wuhan, but not the Intermediate Horseshoe Bat (whose nearest caves were hundreds of kilometers away, and were not sold in the local Wet Markets.
Indeed: This time, though, the intermediate-host hypothesis has one big problem. More than a year after covid-19 began, no food animal has been identified as a reservoir for the pandemic virus. That’s despite efforts by China to test tens of thousands of animals, including pigs, goats, and geese, according to Liang Wannian, who leads the Chinese side of the research team. No one has found a “direct progenitor” of the virus, he says, and therefore the pandemic “remains an unsolved mystery.”
The contagion, however, gave cover for changing the dynamics of the election, opened the door to mass absentee balloting, and months hence, VOILA, Trump is gone, and China sitting pretty and eyeing the red meat of Hong Kong and Taiwan (for starters).
Here's the way I look at it.. If you have faith in those vaccines, then get them, then STFU... Be glad your cleansed... Damn Libtard Communist virus anyway, if there even is such a thing... Otherwise get yourself a bottle of Nyquil...
mikey4691: Here's the way I look at it.. If you have faith in those vaccines, then get them, then STFU... Be glad your cleansed... Damn Libtard Communist virus anyway, if there even is such a thing... Otherwise get yourself a bottle of Nyquil...
Yes. They are such control freaks. Whatever happened to My Body, My Choice? Or, informed consent?
Yet, you get such bug-eyed vitriol from Leftists if you don't fall into sheep-line. [Baaa ramm ewe...]
They say, to anger an American, tell him a lie. To anger a Leftist, tell him the truth.
Oh, BTW:
Doubts over Oxford vaccine as it fails to stop coronavirus in animal trials
I heard in the news tonight that Pfizer says those who have gotten two shots will probably have to get a third shot and more than likely get a shot every year. That should brighten their Profit & Loss Statement especially on the Profit side.
I've have never gotten a flu shot and have no intention of getting a Covid vaccine shot especially the Johnson & Johnson one.
secretagent09: I heard in the news tonight that Pfizer says those who have gotten two shots will probably have to get a third shot and more than likely get a shot every year. That should brighten their Profit & Loss Statement especially on the Profit side.
I've have never gotten a flu shot and have no intention of getting a Covid vaccine shot especially the Johnson & Johnson one.
My friend and I were talking about that last night..we have both had the 2 doses of Pfizer..we both thought it would be an every year thing...
I was never one to get a flu shot..nor, would I have, if I didn’t work with the public.
I wonder if the government will pay for the yearly vaccines in years to come?
secretagent09: I've have never gotten a flu shot and have no intention of getting a Covid vaccine shot especially the Johnson & Johnson one.
You are wise.
Consider that Big Pharma has managed to get complete immunity from lawsuits should you start growing appendages out of the top of your head, or, God forbid, the shot offs you.
Shouldn't one be extra cautious under those conditions?
gonelikethewimd: My friend and I were talking about that last night..we have both had the 2 doses of Pfizer..we both thought it would be an every year thing...
I was never one to get a flu shot..nor, would I have, if I didn’t work with the public.
I wonder if the government will pay for the yearly vaccines in years to come?
I have had 2 Pfizer and no problems, if we need a yearly jab, the NHS will pay for it, and really as I have a yearly flu jab now it's no great hardship, compared to the peace of mind I get. It acts as a covid passport too
tomcatty: I have had 2 Pfizer and no problems, if we need a yearly jab, the NHS will pay for it, and really as I have a yearly flu jab now it's no great hardship, compared to the peace of mind I get. It acts as a covid passport too
Consider that Big Pharma has managed to get complete immunity from lawsuits should you start growing appendages out of the top of your head, or, God forbid, the shot offs you.
Shouldn't one be extra cautious under those conditions?
Well you would want the lawyers out of the way if there was a pressing need to get something done. Normally the legal consequences to a mistake are worse than the consequences in reality. Lawyers are people who win by argument what they couldn't win at work, a natural thieving and politicised profession that fosters your sense of injury.
I had the virus back in January & to be honest , I didn’t know I had it until I lost my sense of smell & taste . In essence, I have the same antibodies in my system as yourself .
I noticed this article, remembering your question.
Food for thought.
The Biden Administration Regime Appears to Ignore Potential Danger of Vaccinating Those Previously Exposed to COVID-19
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »