RE: The Verdict

Jac, do you hope Trump goes free so that his supporters can vote for him?

RE: The Verdict

When they gonna look into the Clinton foundation by the way,
is that next year?

RE: The Verdict

Maybe, I don't know I don't pay attention to the witch hunt,
but he should be allowed to run for presidency.

RE: The Verdict

He is pro at avoiding taxes, as agood buisnessman should.

RE: The Verdict

I'm disappointed too.

RE: The Verdict

9, 11 and 12.

RE: The Verdict

You can delete post 10 and this one if you wish,
I didn't succssed in copy-reply properly.

Laters wave

RE: The Verdict

No, you're the lawyer of us so I have nothing to show for in this 'cs court of law that' will hold water.
But for anyone else I just put up that video. If not the word 'balance' that sems to have been objected to (sorry your honor) but for ehmm... fun? beer
Thanks for not deleting.

Joe Rogan is slowly moving in the right direction. As Jimmy Dore before him.
Will you soon consider jumping on the (insert unmentionable name here) -train as well ?

RE: The Verdict

I'm not sure if you misunderstand the word 'balance', or have just misused it.

This thread is reporting the details with respect to the verdict in the NY civil fraud trial against Trump, his associates and the Trump Organisation.

Relaying information about a recent event is not 'unbalanced' if the intention is to relay information about a recent event.

A youtube short bitchin' about other people, complete with pantomime gnarly facial expressions is the Trumpist '...but what about..?' technique of redirection and obsfucation. I like to keep my Trump-related blogs on topic for this very reason.

If you wish to put the blog topic in some kind of context, maybe you could compare the legal proceedings and outcome with another NY civil fraud case, explaining where you think the similarities, or differences lie with respect to the application of the law.

No, you're the lawyer of us so I have nothing to show for in this 'cs court of law that' will hold water.
But for anyone else I just put up that video. If not the word 'balance' that sems to have been objected to (sorry your honor) but for ehmm... fun? beer
Thanks for not deleting.

Joe Rogan is slowly moving in the right direction. As Jimmy Dore before him.
Will you soon consider jumping on the (insert unmentionable name here) -train as well ?

hug

RE: Who is next?

Ehmm....no a bit less hard.
It's more about how much of ukrainian golden fields will be milked by outsiders from the west that concerns me now. Azov is a bit passe I think, they snuk into the ordinary army and Washington think it's bad for publicity so no, they will never again be as powerful as back in 2014.

gnite

RE: Breaking news...

Yea, but you come across as younger! lips
(oh the charmer...haha)

Best would be if a president had to be between 38 and 48 when entering office for the first time. Not 102.

wave sleep bouquet

RE: Who is next?

Can you answer me a sincere question without gling into delf denfense Tule?IS anybody talking to the leader there (the one you call putler) abut how to shape teh future withput going behind his back?

That is what I would do if I was anywhere near Russian politics. Go and speak to Putin and together start chisel out a political future. I mean even he will not live for ever and must have an interest in creating something here that will not be immediatly devoured by DC hangarounds soons as he's put in a nursing home. What are they doing that make Putin so upset by the way? Must be the way they do it init.
That shgould be Tuckers next mission, to try get some clearity what Putin think about the political future of Russia.
Do you know?

RE: The Verdict

Here check what Joe Rogan is saying about the Clintons... no you know... just for balance... dunno



(shorts, ca. 1 minute)

RE: Breaking news...

I'll answer that with a question: who blew up the pipeline?

RE: Breaking news...

So I take that as a yes.
Do you know what a FISA court is?

RE: Breaking news...

We're not gonna go through them one by one now chat, but you know deep down much of these cases was suspicious in more than just one way. We don't have to go in to it, but some of us know that it's not enough now to just shout "criminal" no more when much of these cases are poitically motivated. A clue: they been using all possible tools to bring a certain tall New Yorker down since about 2016.
I think I feel most sorry for Flynn, cos he was old school. A proud man and all that.

RE: Breaking news...

So what do you say GS, they're all equally bad still?

RE: Breaking news...

Imran Khan ofcourse.

RE: Breaking news...

DOJ.....
weaponized.

And every european who don't understand how deep the corruption goes say;
NO WAAYYY... caaan't be
Well, can be!

After I saw Lois Lerner almost 20years ago.. I learned nothing is impossible.
Than came the 'fabelous' Steel Dossier, named after a certain Brit
and ...the rest is histoare.

-

I can admit I have no clue what Trump and his family is being prosecuted over, but whatever it may be
what his political opponent did, was WAAAAYYYY worse (Biden).
But Joseph...oh he is still running, ofcourse!
Do you really need to hear much more?

RE: Breaking news...

..and look what they did to Omar Sharif in Pakistan now, en even more clear cut case of the same:
14 years to him for basically nothing, and this also ordered from ..yea guess the country... lol
GS, you naive.

RE: Has anyone seen Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with President Vladimir Putin?

Yea, valentinka and all lips teddybear heart wings

Perhaps I'll write my own blog(s) and perhaps I'll even close for comments as Ten suggest.

However; in short:
No war, no nuclear war ofcourse (that would be the worst).
Support Trump cos he is anti war and pro talks/deals/negotiations.
Be sceptical to the deep state. It exsist and is the political tool the upper class use
in return for some cash/benetfits under the table: this is the corruption of D.C.
Basically the people lost most control over there and the whole world is affected,
as contracts are harvested by America/EU based multinational corps.
Only intidote now that the democrats always block
their good guys like Tulsi and Kennedy.jr -
is Trump.

So in conclusion: it's not really about the man Donald, but about the people vs the state within the state that solidified their power over decades now leaving the voters out in the dark. Not good for the world.

I hope I'll be off this blog now.
At least that is my short term goal.




tip hat

RE: Has anyone seen Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with President Vladimir Putin?

You are kind of wrong.
Let's say B iden had policies that I thought was beneficial to mankind
I'd let it be known and I'd forgive him for Tara Reade.
I could wrote blog afater blog mocking his disabilites due to his cognetive decline but I don't.

RE: Has anyone seen Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with President Vladimir Putin?

You can say what you want, but when I ask you about what the man had to say you atteck his character. To me that is weak arguing, and frankly beneath me.
Don't call names is rule number one if you wanna hear my thoughts.
Go after the ball, not the man nor the messanger.

RE: Has anyone seen Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with President Vladimir Putin?

Present not prevent.

RE: Has anyone seen Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with President Vladimir Putin?

You leave me speachless. Prevent some kind of solution please. Or is there none? What is your message here?

RE: Has anyone seen Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with President Vladimir Putin?

G.S, comon tell me somthing good....please...
Salamuna is really making herself useless as a serious debate partner sadly. How about you?
Do you understand the gravity of what American foregin policy is doing here?

RE: Has anyone seen Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with President Vladimir Putin?

Let me check if I really got this straight... everything, every truth bomb about American rough imperialistic crazy shit done abroad, inlcuding their latest trick of imprisoning Imran khan for 14years is cool with you cos a man you dispise said this truth?.. so all of a sudden what the usa did in Ukraine and now in Pakistan is suddenly all cool.. cos Jeffrey Sachs whom worked closely witn Gorbachev brought this to us.
Ok then.

Like Yoda said "much anger in him" (her this time).

RE: Has anyone seen Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with President Vladimir Putin?

Today.

And stop this dramaturgic "good luck" stuff, or feeling puty or whatnot.

I'm 53 years old. Was not born yday. I know where I stand. I stand with the people of the planet and thair need of peace and happiness. Freedom too. So you go blazing your aggrro some other direction.
Not welcome here with me.

RE: Has anyone seen Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with President Vladimir Putin?

Ok.
I respect Sachs a lot. As shown above he can teach us how American tentacles is controlling politics even as far as Pakistan, right now toady. This is valuable learning.

RE: Has anyone seen Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with President Vladimir Putin?

So you say we need a bit of the world police? Not if it's them who is making the problem to begin with. I'm glad they support Israel with a few aircraft carriers, but apart from that I see no good deeds. Best to bring the boys firmly back home like Trump want.

This is a list of blog comments created by Grandsiozzie.

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here