Or you do. Real terrorists have been found through phone, social media and email messages.
There are cases like terrorists, kidnapped kids/people where speed and getting access to these kind of data is vital. If it was someone from my family in a kidnapped situation like that, I wouldn't give a damn about someone's phone records privacy.
I have nothing to hide and I'm would be more worried about a scenario about someone close to me in danger of terrorists/criminals than the police reading my messages.
Police and anti-terrorist organisations unfortunately have their uses.
Yes, if someone is a suspect in a crime, government organisations should be able to look at phone and internet records.
As for me, if they want to look at my records, good luck. I have nothing to hide and all that happens is that someone might get a red head reading some of the more interesting text messages.
It's more everyday stuff for me, taking someone into consideration, hearing that they think of you and want to be with you and wanting to put a smile on my face.
Easier or not, straying is straying - there are people who are monogamous and not interested in straying of any kind, and that's the type of person I would want to be with.
I think it's easy enough (in most cases) to figure out who has rowing eyes or is into sleeping around.
Yep, it was fun when mum helped me and we could chat during painting and I wouldn't have minded some help trying to drill a hole when I obviously hit a steel beam.
Progress is slow, but continuously. Looks like home now.
RE: The FBI versus Apple
I do think otherwise rizlared.