The Reality Of Global Warming

In climate science, Radiative Forcing or climate forcing, is defined as the difference of radiant energy received by the Earth, and energy radiated back to space.
A positive radiative forcing tends on average to warm the surface of the Earth, and negative forcing tends on average to cool the surface.
Between the start of the Industrial Era and roughly present time (~1750 – 2005) the values of Radiative Forcing for some of the main atmospheric agents, commonly referred to as greenhouse gases, are as follows:

Carbon Dioxide - from 1.49 to 1.83 W/m²
(average RF value of 1.66 W/m²).
Methane - from 0.43 to 0.53 W/m²
(average RF value of 0.48 W/m²).
Nitrous Oxide - from 0.14 to 0.18 W/m²
(average RF value of 0.16 W/m²).
Halocarbon gases - from 0.31 to 0.37 W/m²
(average RF value of 0.34 W/m²)

The above data clearly show that there has been a noticeable increase in the overall Radiative Forcing value, due to the effects of the increase in the emission of greenhouse gases, in recent times, indicating a warming effect on the earth.

~seand/headinacloud/?page_id=129


The Union of Concerned Scientists puts rigorous, independent science to work to solve our planet's most pressing problems. Joining with citizens across the country, they combine technical analysis and effective advocacy to create innovative, practical solutions for a healthy, safe, and sustainable future.
UCS members are people from all walks of life: parents and businesspeople, biologists and physicists, teachers and students. Their members understand that scientific analysis—not political calculations or corporate hype—should guide our efforts to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.
Here is their view on Global Warming:

The planet's temperature is rising. The trend is clear and unmistakable.
Every one of the past 37 years has been warmer than the 20th century average. The 12 warmest years on record have all occurred since 1998. 2012 was the hottest year ever recorded for the contiguous United States.
Globally, the average surface temperature has increased more than one degree Fahrenheit since the late 1800s. Most of that increase has occurred over just the past three decades.
We are overloading our atmosphere with carbon dioxide, which traps heat and steadily drives up the planet’s temperature. Where does all this carbon come from? The fossil fuels we burn for energy — coal, natural gas, and oil — plus the loss of forests due to deforestation, especially in the tropics.
Within the scientific community, there is no debate: An overwhelming majority of climate scientists agree that global warming is happening and that human activity is the primary cause.

This broad consensus — and the extensive scientific evidence that supports it — is often downplayed or distorted by a small but vocal minority of special interests that have a vested interest in delaying action on climate change.
Why has it been so difficult to achieve meaningful solutions to global warming? Media pundits, partisan think tanks, and special interest groups funded by fossil fuel and related industries raise doubts about the truth of global warming.
These contrarians downplay and distort the evidence of climate change, demand policies that allow industries to continue polluting, and attempt to undercut existing pollution standards.
This barrage of misinformation misleads and confuses the public about the growing consequences of global warming— and makes it more difficult to implement the solutions we need to effectively reduce the man-made emissions that cause global warming.
Together with its members and supporters, UCS actively fights misrepresentations of climate science and provides sound, science-based evidence to set the record straight, including resources to help communicate the real facts about global warming.

Post Comment

Comments (5)

Hi Conrad

Thanks for your input.
With regard to your reference to water vapour, research results indicates that water vapour in the stratosphere actually contributes to global warming.

Here are extracts from two research sources to support this:

Water vapor in the stratosphere increases in tandem with increases in the Earth‘s surface temperature,” said coauthor Sean Davis, a scientist with the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at the University of Colorado Boulder, who works at the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory. “Because water vapor is a greenhouse gas, this generates additional warming. We show that this feedback loop could be about 10% of the climate warming from all greenhouse gases.” - See more at:


Water vapor is known to be Earth’s most abundant greenhouse gas, but the extent of its contribution to global warming has been debated. Using recent NASA satellite data, researchers have estimated more precisely than ever the heat-trapping effect of water in the air, validating the role of the gas as a critical component of climate change.
Water vapor feedback can also amplify the warming effect of other greenhouse gases, such that the warming brought about by increased carbon dioxide allows more water vapor to enter the atmosphere
This new data set shows that as surface temperature increases, so does atmospheric humidity. Dumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere makes the atmosphere more humid. And since water vapor is itself a greenhouse gas, the increase in humidity amplifies the warming from carbon dioxide."



I invite you to do a google search on "global warming water vapour" and check the findings yourself. In fact, water vapour is classified as a greenhouse gas.


"Besides,Warming has stopped about sixteen years ago,in spite of the increase in CO2!
we are still on the Tailend of the last Iceage,which is the real reason for the melting Ice and the Warming!"


What is the scientific evidence for your claims as stated above?
I have given you the research evidence and sources to support what I have stated. Could you please do the same?
Thank you!
soc
Will look into the stats...everyone should be questioning the effects of global warming...doesn't hurt to start at the grass roots level...I am all for reducing waste and promoting green living!!wine
A tend to warming doesn't mean that tend will be unstoppable.
Hi loulou

Yes, I agree with you that you should look at the statistics yourself, and encourage you to do so.
But please share your findings and the source with us.
Hi Guzman

Thanks for your comment.
The trend will only be stopped if the necessary action is taken.
Post Comment - Let others know what you think about this Blog.
Meet the Author of this Blog
socrates44online today!

socrates44

San Fernando, Trinidad and Tobago

I identify with the following words of Socrates:
“Know thyself”.
“The unexamined life is not worth living”.

I am a person who seek depth in life and living. This has been an overwhelming desire in me even since childhood. It is identified with a [read more]