Last Commented Opinionated Blogs (1,911)

Pelosi Demands Trump “Not Run” For Re-Election; “Do The Country A Favor”

Nancy Pelosi is reveling in her glory after retaking the powerful Speaker Of The House position following the midterm elections last November and is drunk with power as she pursues her vendetta against President Trump.

The aging Pelosi is surrounded by her cadre of socialist enforcers led by media sensation Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. It was just this week that AOC showed how things are going to be done when she actually threatened moderate House Democrats with punishment for going against the glorious leader.

In addition to AOC, Pelosi’s snarling attack dogs include extremist freshmen Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and Ayanna Pressley who despite their inexperience, were all handed positions on the powerful committees that will be tasked with launching a plethora of investigations against Trump and his associates, many of whom will be hauled in front of McCarthyist tribunals like the Michael Cohen hearing last week.

While she has clearly exhibited multiple signs of dementia, Pelosi has arguably never been more powerful and enjoys the protection of a corrupt media that has become a propaganda machine that runs 24/7 to brainwash Americans by delegitimizing Trump and those who voted for him while promoting an authoritarian socialist party and glorifying the Mueller-led police state that it will rely on to stay in power.

Pelosi’s posse is chafing at the bit to get about the business of impeaching Trump because they can’t beat him legitimately next November and the soon to be 79-year-old has thrown down the gauntlet calling for a complete surrender from her nemesis.

The Speaker and her commissars were the subjects of a cover story in the far-left Rolling Stone magazine along with a video extra, during the shoot Pelosi and Ocasio-Cortez decried Trump and demanded that he NOT even bother running for reelection.

President Trump spoke at CPAC on Saturday and blasted the Deep State and the Mueller witch hunt as “bullsh*t.”

“We had the greatest of all time. Now we have people that lost, and unfortunately you put the wrong people in a couple of positions, and they leave people for a long time that shouldn’t be there. And all of a sudden, they are trying to take you out with bullsh*t, okay? With bullsh*t.”

The crowd went wild!

Click on link for the story:

I wasn't going to make this a political blog... but it has to do with someone in politics.
Michael Cohen was in the news this past week giving (possibly damaging) testimony against President Trump. Why possible damage, is that many of the things he said would need to be verified.

If I told you to protect someone I buried evidence to a murder and many years later I changed my mind and wanted to reveal I knew what happened, you could dispute it until the evidence was found, forensics verified and then confirmed what I said was true. It doesn't mean I lied, it means my story needed to be verified.

Did he say enough to justify research? Yeah, I think so.

Listening to comments made by conservatives, everything Cohen said was a lie and that he made everything up to save his own skin and reduce prison time. Not one of them wavered with their story that Cohen was 100% BS.

What was it... 10 years that Cohen worked for Trump and he didn't know any dirt about the man? Be serious. If you are convinced that Cohen has no verifiable dirt on Trump, then you would also dispute charges of tax fraud/evasion on Trump should that arise.

That's my opinion.

Donald Trump Jr. was perfectly at home.

It was day three of the annual Conservative Political Action Conference, commonly known as CPAC, and hundreds of activists had piled into a ballroom to hear the president’s elder son speak via live-stream. He was slated to have a conversation at Liberty University with the school’s president, Jerry Falwell Jr., though it was unclear, exactly, what that conversation would be about. While most other CPAC speakers were constrained by specific topics, such as “Protecting the Freedom of Jerusalem” and “Deficit Hawks: An Endangered Species?,” Don Jr.’s appearance was headlined on the agenda as simply “Live.”

But that was, in many ways, the point. Over the course of Donald Trump’s presidency, Don Jr.’s profile has skyrocketed. Much like his father, his draw has become based not so much on what he has to say, but on his presence alone. The 40-year-old emerged as one of the Republican Party’s most coveted surrogates in the lead-up to November’s elections, headlining more than 60 events throughout 2018. “He’s a great spokesman for his dad,” one rally-goer told McClatchy a few days before the midterms. “He punches back. I love that style and apparently it’s working.”

Full article:

Laurie Cardoza-Moore, founder of Proclaiming Justice to the Nations, has accused Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-MN) of being a “Hamas plant” in Congress.

“Ilhan Omar covertly represents Hamas in the US Congress. We need to act now before this blows up in our faces,” she said in a statement.

Cardoza-Moore made the comments after it was reported that Omar will speak in March at the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) fund-raiser in Los Angeles.

CAIR is known for supporting terrorist organizations that have acted against Israel and the United States, including Hamas and Hezbollah.

FBI investigators uncovered evidence establishing CAIR’s place in the “Palestine Committee,” which was a Muslim Brotherhood-created network aimed at helping Hamas in the United States, according to a report by the Investigative Project on Terrorism. In 2009, US District Court Judge Jorge Solis ruled that there is “at least a prima facie case as to CAIR’s involvement in a conspiracy to support Hamas.”

Moreover, the group was officially designated a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates in 2014, placing it in the company of al-Qaeda, Islamic State and others.

“CAIR and Hamas are one in the same,” Cardoza-Moore claimed. “Ilhan Omar openly fund-raising for CAIR means she is not just a rabid antisemite, but a real threat to our national security.”

Earlier this month, after Omar tweeted what was considered by politicians and leaders on both sides of the aisle to be an antisemitic statement, Cardoza-Moore launched a petition to oust the Islamic congresswoman from office. So far, thousands of Americans have signed the petition.

Cardoza-Moore said that PJTN, a 501c3 nonprofit that was established to educate Christians about their “biblical responsibility to stand with their Jewish brethren and Israel,” would continue to “wage our national campaign to unite American patriots against this dangerous phenomenon.

“We the people demand that members of a subversive antisemitic organization, with close ties to terrorist groups, not be made welcome in our Congress,” she continued.

After Omar tweeted her antisemitic comment accusing AIPAC of paying politicians to support Israel, she issued an apology. However, many politicians and Jewish leaders considered her retraction inauthentic. President Donald Trump called on Omar to resign.

Then, days later, Omar again came under fire for agreeing to speak at an Islamic Relief USA event alongside Yousef Abdallah, who has advocated for violence against Jews and expressed antisemitic sentiments on his social media pages. But, as media reports surfaced, Abdallah’s name was removed from publicity for the event.

The CAIR talk, scheduled for March 23, is the latest in the controversy surrounding Omar. Hassan Shibly, the chief executive director for CAIR-Florida, will also be speaking at the event. Shibly has stated that Hezbollah and Hamas are not terrorist organizations, according to multiple reports.

Furthermore, a CAIR representative defended Omar’s antisemitic tweet.

According to the website Citizen Truth, Robert McCaw, director of government affairs for CAIR, said that the organization does not see Omar’s pointing an accusatory finger at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) as antisemitic, adding that the organization is paying politicians to be pro-Israel.

“CAIR supports Representative Omar and her efforts to highlight the lobbying efforts of ,” McCaw commented. “CAIR does not feel there was any antisemitic meaning in her tweet, but due to the brevity some took it as such.”

...you get a disbarred scummy ex attorney, soon headed for a stay in the Big House for, inter alia, lying, not only to congress, but to banks, the FBI, his fat Yennte wifey, and more. The lying singing continues, today for the nation to enjoy. Then you use him to somehow rescue endless failing Hail Mary Pass approaches to impeachment. Slick governance.

I bought into the idea that a business man needed to be elected in order to straighten out our country's business. Our economy. How to spend our money to benefit our citizenry.
It hit me!
Business men and women have been in control of the country all along!
The difference is this....
The businessmen of the past have controlled our money from the outside of government to benefit their special interest. They have done it by contributing to the campaigns of politicians that in turn pass legislation that will benefit their business and in turn benefit the politician. See the problem here???
The politician winds up passing laws that no longer benefit America, but rather benefit the businessmen and women at the expense of the taxpayer. Can you say WASTE?? CORRUPTION????
That's our system.

Finally, we elect one of these "businessmen" that knows the gig and has become wealthy from personal business and dealing with politicians all along the way.
Our country was founded on free enterprise. These wealthy men and women that built this country have controlled our politicians from the beginning.
Most of our politicians are career politicians. The dumber the better as far as the businesses that own them are concerned. They just need to look the part, speak the part, and act the part. 
In today's culture, that's all that matters. Their qualifications mean NOTHING!! Looks and swag get it done!!
And the general public buys it hook, line , and sinker. 
Make no mistake here..... not one of them votes unless it is on behalf of the business men and women that are contributing to their campaign.
Corruption runs rampant. Both sides. Pay to play. Unbridled.
Trump threatens it all. They hate him for it. If he were a congressman depending on the contributions for his job.....he would be no threat. He would be one of them.

1. When people ask for something in their questions, 2020 Democrat candidates double down and promise more, not only to satisfy them but to satisfy people who are not present and may watch the event later. They want to promise to the point of no return. Empty promises are their cookies to distribute wealth and buy votes.

2. In every question they answer, they lack any analytical foundation to explain how they are going to deliver. Governance is more about "how" than "what." They ignore the question of how because it shows the policy-making and law-making capacities of a politician. For example, when they are asked about climate change, they emphasize the importance of the issue, but they do not say how: on which level they are going to act? How are resources going to be allocated or diverted? How will millions of Americans react? What kind of taxes will they consider? How will these policies have an effect on the price of fuel and natural gas, food, and transportation?

3. In answering every question regarding social and economic issues, they never mention science, technology, civil associations, church, NGOs, individual responsibility, hard work, and family as the solution. The key that opens all the doors is government — i.e., the federal government. Gov. Hickenlooper sometimes talks about state and local governments as the medium for change and progress.

4. They do not have the guts to disagree even if the demand is not deliverable or the question is foolish (except Sen. Klobuchar on free four-year college). They do not have the guts to challenge their audience.

5. The objective of mobilization is stimulation and not awareness. They never give you different sides of a story or policy. They love ignorant voters who vote based on ideology, not facts. You do not learn anything when you listen to their answers. According to their method of communication, the audience should be deployed, not informed. The media are in line with this approach.

6. The diversity of looks is way more important than the diversity of ideas and perspectives when they pick who is going to ask a question. This is the result of media, academia, and politics in the last three decades. Democrats do not care about the truth that is only reflected when there are venues for competing narratives; they want more ethnic and skin color and sex diversity when they address any issue or problem.

7. They so love hecklers and disturbers, to show that they are tolerant and open — that if somebody speaks when they are talking, he will be labeled as one. In the last 20 years, I have not seen anyone who disturbs Democrats' events. The tradition of heckling and disturbing events in the 21st century belongs to Democrats when they wanted to limit freedom of speech of Trump and his supporters.

8. I do not know how and if people in their events are picked, but it is amazing that nobody asks tough and serious policy questions to challenge the candidates' positions. The attendees are there to give enough space to the candidate to say whatever he wants to say.

He continually adapts while the Dems remain static.

The Democrats squealed with delight when the President decided to temporarily end the partial government shutdown. Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and their media supporters believe they have won a famous victory. Indeed, more than a few have declared the Trump presidency dead. This isn’t merely delusional, it means that two years of dealing with “the Donald” have taught them nothing about how he operates. The President is adapting to the post-midterm political environment by changing his “game face.” The Democrats continue to indulge their irrational antipathy toward Trump and embrace increasingly inane policy positions. Meanwhile, he is becoming more presidential.

Thus, when he was told last week that Nancy Pelosi had withdrawn the SOTU invitation, he reacted more in sorrow than in anger: “I’m not surprised. It’s really a shame what’s happening with the Democrats. They’ve become radicalized.” Then, after getting Madam Speaker’s attention by halting her taxpayer-funded vacation, he responded in a measured fashion: “She changed her mind because of the shutdown, suggesting a later date. This is her prerogative. I will do the address when the shutdown is over.” Now that she has once again invited him to speak to Congress, and what may well be a record national audience, he will use the SOTU address to close the deal on the Wall.

Not that the voters require much persuading. Monday evening, a poll commissioned by the RNC was released showing that a majority of voters in 10 key congressional districts held by Democrats believe that the President’s shutdown compromise should have been accepted by Pelosi and Schumer. The Washington Examiner reports that a 61%-35% majority support the president’s position on border security. They also support building a wall between the U.S. and Mexico by a 53%-43% margin. And even more deadly for his opponents, Trump’s statesmanship is working. By a 41%-34% margin, voters said he was “more open to compromise on this issue” than congressional Democrats.

This is consistent with numerous polls that have found substantial majorities of voters favoring compromise on border security, and it is why the shutdown dramatically increased Nancy Pelosi’s negatives without seriously affecting Trump’s. A large plurality of Americans believe we have a genuine crisis on our hands at the U.S.-Mexico border, and they are unlikely to view continued Democratic intransigence favorably as three new caravans from Central America head our way. Yet the new Democratic majority in the House seems determined to ignore the clear and present danger posed by wave after wave of illegal immigrants entering the country. The Washington Times reports:

New House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith questioned why the mission was expanded from guard to active-duty troops.… Defense Undersecretary for Policy John Rood told Congress that those caravans are one reason why the presence of active-duty troops is still needed on the U.S.-Mexico border.… Vice Admiral Michael Gilday, director of operations at the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said they just didn’t have enough capacity within the National Guard.

Full article:

I spent 6 years in the United States Air Force. I never went looking for a salute but I sure do appreciate it when I get one. When someone says "Thank you for your service" I am on top of the world. I feel proud that I served my country. It makes me sick to my stomach when I see elected officials screaming for assistance for illegal aliens and not one peep for our homeless veterans. Until our homeless heroes are taken care of I don't ever want to hear about 'dreamers'. Tell me, when is the last time you ever heard a 'dreamer' screamer speak on the behalf of our homeless veterans?