Last Commented Politics Blogs (943)

Not fake news. Independent newspaper published this grim reality two hours ago.

When that happens, that's it. The end of the world as we know.

Yay...

Published on fox news 11 hours ago.

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Mueller's ultimate target is Trump.

"Does any of this relate to President Donald Trump? Here is the back story.

At the same time that Paul Manafort and his business partner Rick Gates were guiding the Trump campaign in the summer of 2016, Russian agents were manipulating American social media sites so as to arouse chaos in general and animosity toward Hillary Clinton in particular. The Department of Justice appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller as independent counsel to determine whether any Americans had criminally helped the Russians.

The alleged crimes of Manafort and Gates appear to have nothing to do with Trump, nor have they any facial relationship to the Russians. So why were these two indicted by a grand jury hearing evidence about alleged American assistance to Russian interference with the 2016 presidential campaign?

When prosecutors confront a complex series of potentially criminal events, they often do not know at the outset of their investigation where the evidence will lead them. Sometimes they come upon a person who they believe has knowledge of facts they seek and that person declines to speak with them. Such a refusal to speak to the government is perfectly lawful in America, yet it often triggers a prosecution of the potential witness so that prosecutors may squeeze him -- not literally, of course -- for evidence to which they believe he can lead them.

The ultimate target of Mueller’s investigation is President Trump. It is standard operating procedure when prosecutors have a high-level target to charge those below the target with something just to get them to cooperate. Though the charges against Manafort and Gates need not be related to the Russians or to Trump, they must be real. It's clear they are, as each is facing more than 20 years in prison. Mueller believes that that prospect is enough to dispatch their lawyers to make deals with him.

The danger of such a deal is that Manafort and Gates may offer to tell Mueller what they think he wants to hear -- even if it is not truthful -- so that they can have their prison exposure lessened."

OR

$multi-million DoD sponsored recruitment propaganda aimed at young Murkuns?



How 'bout a 'Separation Of Football & State'?

I heard on the news about the killing of 20 + at a church in Texas today (Sunday), how sad to attend church and that sort of thing happpened. What the H*** is wrong with the idiots in Washington who will not protect its citizens but will protect the gun lobby, 2nd amendment ? The amendment is not being followed, only half of it is, tell me
where is the militia provided by the amendment? Maybe if some kook raided the U.S. legislature maybe they would wake up,it is evident they do nothing to earn the money they receive. Not this kook, I don't own a gun of any kind , and if I did, I couldn't pull the trigger if I pointed it at someone. studecar

He knows he is not going to win for any reelection. How convenient for him to express his criticism against a president who seems to be working hard to make this country great again.

What does he do? He sensationalizes his political exit for his self serving interest of becoming the center of attention for his future plans.

How I came up with this idea is, this morning Matt Lauer asked him how he can accept that position that "by exiting you are actually surrendering to the loss of the people whom you claim to serve." He never answered that and I am equally surprise why Matt Lauer didn't pursue for his response to give a direct answer to that question.

My personal analysis is that this man, is not committed to serve the people. This man is not really committed for the greatness of this country. He is shouting for his need for attention and that is all there is to it.

Imagine the corrupt establishment that has been ebbed with political shenanigans that are only interested to empower their personal ambitions as typical politicians. Here comes a President that is void of all those political ambition and he is criticized for not submitting to the collective corruption that has been the trademark of all political establishments, Democrats or Republican.

Way to go Jeff Flake. Use this moment of your defeat to make yourself the center of attention. Where is your commitment to serve the people then if you think that Trump is a bully, not fit for president and you say don't have the heart to be complicit or accommodating this behaviour. Are there people from the same establishment that joins you in your bold submission?

Why didn't you answer Matt Lauer? That would have been my question.

Anyways, good morning fellow political blog posters and I just want to express how I feel about this bozo...

Your opinions are welcomed and I will not tolerate any personal attacks against any poster including me. I will appreciate any opinion on this particular matter, whether you are pro Trump or against him.

Thank you all for reading.

That declaration I have never truly understood. To me, United is (One). Here in the (United States) each state determine their own laws...etc. Maybe I am way off in my thought...The laws should cover The United States of America...the reality is each state has their rules...HOW is that United? Bring your opinions on!

Clashes of ideas

I just read it from New York Post today.

It's interesting, under what motives is my question.

As a support to the USA? Or more like to show case their military power?

Any opinions?

As we approach the 1st anniversary of arguably the most bizarre Prez Election in U.S. history*, is it too early to consider a challenger to Orange Julius?

Some watchers of the political scene are floating the name of Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D Hawaii) as a possible Dem candidate.
I know what most of y'all are thinking - the same thing I thought when I heard this brought up...'Who the hell is Tulsi Gabbard?!'
Wellll...



Tulsi would bring heat to the office.
She's definitely hotter than Canada's HCIC** hunk is hunky
This is of vital national interest if Murka is to retain parity and not allow a 'hottie/hunky gap' to develop with the Canucks...



The Congresswoman comes with her own campaign song...





Seriously, y'all...
Take a look at her.
I'm sayin' here & now she WILL be elected POTUS at some time.
And it may be as soon as three years and a month from now.
Remember. Y'all heard it here first!

* Possible exception - The Election Of '72...that'd be 1872. The Dems nominated no one and it was the first election in which a woman lost.
Yes. Really. Search...

Presidential Election of 1872

Victoria Woodhull



** - HCIC...Head Canuck In Charge

Now Trump says many things...but what do you think he meant with his recent comment about this being the 'calm before the storm'?

The way it seems, turmoil is becoming more and more prevalent....perhaps he knows of something to come?

and

If so, shouldn't he inform his country to prevent it from coming?





or...is is just more empty talk?