Most Liked Politics Blogs (943)

The second presidential debate surprisingly took place and was in general better than the first in that it went a lot more professional than the first. Each candidate had his chance to get his full say on whatever subject he wanted to clarify. For the most part I don’t think the debate did much to change anyone’s opinion on who they choose to vote for. The line in the sand has been drawn for a long time and most have chosen their side and are dug in deep. It will take an act of God to change the opinion of either side. Here is the words of God that are equally powerful. If not then why do religious people base their faith and willingly sacrifice their lives on books and words beloved to come from God:

Once again, CS Just can't handle the truth! Typical of all the worthless,lying,hypocritical scum who infest this earth anyone with a different opinion must be censored! As far as I am concerned you can ALL go straight to the HELL that is surely awaiting you because,among so many other of your other EVILS you worthless loosers simply cannot abide an opinion,or,better yet TRUTH! That is why you scurry around like rats,nibbling on each others waste like so much cheese! Maybe you would get a better audience for your "party line" if you at least pretended to be objective,honest and rational! You truly illustrate the analogy of the "dog in the manger" since you cannot discern truth you therefore MUST lead as many of your cohoorts,sidekicks and idiot savants astray to the path of destruction you have been headed on for years! It is the only satisfaction you can drive from your brief,miserable,putrid existence here on earth!

For the last 50 years, it is promoting the cruelty of Israel. UNO is defunct by its veto.
War mongers have arsenal to sell and autocracies are eager to buy.
#latestrend

I thought you guys, had Freedom of Speech, enshrined in your Constitution?

Just a humble Aussie, here, asking: Why?





Please Explain...

After wiping out congress party in the legislative assembly, now they have thrashed BJP in the municipal corporation of Delhi.
They are also expected to grow from regional party status to be the national party if they get 6% votes in Gujarat (which is the home turf of the Prime Minister) assembly elections, votes are to be counted tomorrow.
If they're successful to do so, they would be the fastest growing political outfit.

I am sick of seeing all the wanton destruction being wrought upon our treasured statues. It is about time we showed the perpetrators of these acts of vandalism how it feels to have your heritage assaulted. As much as I deplore destructive behaviour, I am sorely tempted to advocate the same treatment against statues of black people. That would hopefully be a sobering lesson to the out-of-control mobs wandering the streets in search of things to demolish.

Of course, we would first have to erect these statues before we could start pulling them down.

If someone wants to come and live in your country, shouldn't you be flattered, and thank them for the compliment , rather than treat them with hostility?

Which of these words do you like to say the most? They are both very popular words, as can be seen by the number of threads with at least one in its title. But if you could only choose one, which would it be? Which one could you simply not live without. Is it more satisfying to call someone who thinks your views are insane a leftist or a liberal? Which one causes the most offence?

But I want them both, Mommy.

Evil, evil, evil, everywhere you look. It's all around us, everywhere. I can't walk down the street without tripping over Satanists and homosexual predators. Where did they all come from? I thought we had enough on our plate with the leftie Liberal commie snowflakes baying at the door, but now somebody's opened the gates of Hell, and not a godamned exorcist in sight.

Not everything from the MSM can be trusted, and even less of what the government says can be trusted, I readily admit that. Apart from the odd instance though, they tend not to go beyond certain boundaries. They are accountable, and liable to embarrassment, discredit and judicial sanction when they are found out. And they often get found out. So, yes, some scepticism is called for when it comes to the media and the government, but it needs to be kept in proportion. Any government that depends on the democratic process to put or keep it in power simply cannot afford the risk of being discredited to the point of making itself unelectable.

Independent political movements and influencers are not subject to the same accountability. They can say pretty much what they like without fear of punishment, and it has to be said that this lack of restraint has emboldened some of them to come out with some very bizarre claims. The trouble is, the implausibility of these claims seems to go unquestioned by the very same people who seem to find even the most reasonable information that comes from the MSM unbelievable.

Just because you don't trust the establishment does not mean that every crackpot who comes out with an alternative narrative is telling you the truth.

The BBC might not be the paragon of truth and impartiality that I would like to think it is, but it's probably as close as we can expect to get to those ideals. And I'm sure it values them a damn sight more than the likes of Alex Jones and David Icke do.