Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay ( Archived) (290)

Jun 20, 2011 12:43 AM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
venere08
venere08venere08Puglia and Autumn, South Australia Australia121 Threads 2 Polls 9,996 Posts
ColonelBogey: But you are carrying this on Ambrose with this post long after it has became clear that it was born out of a very personal nature.
I know what it is like to be made to be brought to account my an ex partner online.
It is a no win situation no matter how you try to justify yourself and it only amounts to the entertainment of others.
I wish you both well.


Not nice...sigh comfort
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 20, 2011 10:17 AM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
EagleWoman
EagleWomanEagleWomanMalaga, Andalusia Spain22 Threads 4,719 Posts
Ambrose ... IMO

A relationship that starts within the energy of dishonesty will never regain it's balance. Even if the dishonesty was due to confusion - confusion (for an intelligent mature person) is a very convenient word, often used when one wants to be self-indulgent at the expense of other's feelings.

And here you are now trying to sell yourself all sorts of ifs and buts and trying to make someone else accountable for THEIR feelings, emotions, actions, reactions ...

When YOU have not acted with integrity during many of the different stages of this relationship including when it (the relationship) was breathing its first breath.

Do not ask of others what you are not capable of offering yourself!!!

The only way to change how people relate to you, is to change how you relate to them, act towards them, react to them, love them. May be the process has to start first with changing how you relate to yourself, act towards yourself, react to yourself, love yourself. dunno



teddybear

For all the people looking for answers outwards, when in reality ALL the answers are within!!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 20, 2011 8:47 PM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
GrammarGirl
GrammarGirlGrammarGirlSouthwestern, Manitoba Canada1 Threads 76 Posts
I just received an email from my ex demanding an apology for my post on this thread. I don't believe I owe him one. In fact, I believe HE should apologize to me for starting this and other painful threads about our personal business.

I know how much he values your opinions as he keeps coming back for them again and again.

So here is my question - Does he deserve an apology for my post? Please weigh in here so we can put this to rest once and for all! roll eyes
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 20, 2011 9:00 PM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
Ambrose2007
Ambrose2007Ambrose2007BFE, South Dakota USA67 Threads 10 Polls 8,881 Posts
GrammarGirl: I just received an email from my ex demanding an apology for my post on this thread. I don't believe I owe him one. In fact, I believe HE should apologize to me for starting this and other painful threads about our personal business.

I know how much he values your opinions as he keeps coming back for them again and again.

So here is my question - Does he deserve an apology for my post? Please weigh in here so we can put this to rest once and for all!


First, I didn't "demand" anything, as you well-know. Second, I do apologize for starting threads which caused you pain.

I do also believe that what I did was the equivalent of a small push and your response was the equivalent of a shotgun blast to the head. You posted extremely detailed character-assassinating claims to a public venue to be seen by thousands. That was wrong.

In any case, your apology would have to come from the heart - YOUR heart - not from some opinion poll.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 20, 2011 9:12 PM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
Ccincy
CcincyCcincyCincinnati, Ohio USA77 Threads 20,535 Posts
What was the real intent of this thread?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 20, 2011 9:29 PM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
Ambrose2007
Ambrose2007Ambrose2007BFE, South Dakota USA67 Threads 10 Polls 8,881 Posts
Ccincy: What was the real intent of this thread?


One thing it wasn't was an attempt to demean, belittle, or otherwise besmirch the character of my ex. No one will find any evidence of that in ANY of my threads.

For me it was about finding answers, about having a genuine discussion about an issue that has perplexed and frustrated me for some time.

And yes, no doubt, it was a final appeal to gg to consider my point of view and possibly a re-thinking of her position. That was, I admit, dumb of me. GG and I do not speak the same language - the language of logic - and my attempts to present a logical case for abandoning ambivalence not only fell on deaf ears, but were also interpreted as an attack.

My idea was that we might work together as equal partners towards resolving our differences. I could never persuade her to consider this change of tactic. One hope I had was that a public discussion about ambivalence might help me understand how people in general think about it and why my attempts to communicate this idea to my ex had failed.

Does this make any sense to anyone?
dunno
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 20, 2011 9:35 PM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
Ccincy
CcincyCcincyCincinnati, Ohio USA77 Threads 20,535 Posts
Ambrose2007: One thing it wasn't was an attempt to demean, belittle, or otherwise besmirch the character of my ex. No one will find any evidence of that in ANY of my threads.

For me it was about finding answers, about having a genuine discussion about an issue that has perplexed and frustrated me for some time.

And yes, no doubt, it was a final appeal to gg to consider my point of view and possibly a re-thinking of her position. That was, I admit, dumb of me. GG and I do not speak the same language - the language of logic - and my attempts to present a logical case for abandoning ambivalence not only fell on deaf ears, but were also interpreted as an attack.

My idea was that we might work together as equal partners towards resolving our differences. I could never persuade her to consider this change of tactic. One hope I had was that a public discussion about ambivalence might help me understand how people in general think about it and why my attempts to communicate this idea to my ex had failed.

Does this make any sense to anyone?


Maybe I'm missing something in this whole thing but no none of it makes any sense.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 20, 2011 9:50 PM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
Ambrose2007
Ambrose2007Ambrose2007BFE, South Dakota USA67 Threads 10 Polls 8,881 Posts
Ccincy: Maybe I'm missing something in this whole thing but no none of it makes any sense.


Well, I don't think I can explain it any clearer than that, CC. dunno
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 20, 2011 9:52 PM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
Ccincy
CcincyCcincyCincinnati, Ohio USA77 Threads 20,535 Posts
Ambrose2007: Well, I don't think I can explain it any clearer than that, CC.



I never epected you to.It's just a sad situation.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 20, 2011 9:59 PM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
venere08
venere08venere08Puglia and Autumn, South Australia Australia121 Threads 2 Polls 9,996 Posts
GrammarGirl: I just received an email from my ex demanding an apology for my post on this thread. I don't believe I owe him one. In fact, I believe HE should apologize to me for starting this and other painful threads about our personal business.

I know how much he values your opinions as he keeps coming back for them again and again.

So here is my question - Does he deserve an apology for my post? Please weigh in here so we can put this to rest once and for all!


Hi GG, I didn't want to re-enter this thread, but I feel the need to make a comment afterreading your post. I don't know you, but have known Ambrose as a longtime poster here.

I find your question asked of a public audience, highly inappropriate. Surely it is something you need to decide for yourself. And as for putting 'this to rest', again, this is the kind of thing you decide on how to do this, together, in private.

I suggest that you write to Ambrose in private, or dare I say, speak with him???JMO

wine
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 20, 2011 10:02 PM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
Ambrose2007
Ambrose2007Ambrose2007BFE, South Dakota USA67 Threads 10 Polls 8,881 Posts
Ccincy: I never epected you to.It's just a sad situation.


Yeah. But for me explanations - or trying to get them - helps. For me, understanding what happened is my path to peace. wave dunno
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 21, 2011 8:09 AM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
nanners2863
nanners2863nanners2863Cayuga, Ontario Canada38 Threads 3,355 Posts
Sadly, things have taken an ugly turn here. Clearly, we have two people here who are hurting. I truly believe no one is right and no one is wrong. The things that have transpired here are human reactions to hurt, pain and anger. I truly feel that if in any way, either party feels remorse for their actions or words, then they should apologize. A huge part of letting go and healing is apologizing for any wrongs that a person may have done and being forgiven. I believe a conversation needs to be had here. No talking about what could have been, who did what to who, who is right or who is wrong but just a simple "I'm sorry for any pain I have caused. I wish you the best of love and life. Take care". There comes a time to let go and I think that time has come. For the both of you I wish nothing but love, healing, peace and happiness. teddybear
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 21, 2011 8:09 AM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
EagleWoman
EagleWomanEagleWomanMalaga, Andalusia Spain22 Threads 4,719 Posts
Ambrose2007: One thing it wasn't was an attempt to demean, belittle, or otherwise besmirch the character of my ex. No one will find any evidence of that in ANY of my threads.

For me it was about finding answers, about having a genuine discussion about an issue that has perplexed and frustrated me for some time.

And yes, no doubt, it was a final appeal to gg to consider my point of view and possibly a re-thinking of her position. That was, I admit, dumb of me. GG and I do not speak the same language - the language of logic - and my attempts to present a logical case for abandoning ambivalence not only fell on deaf ears, but were also interpreted as an attack.

My idea was that we might work together as equal partners towards resolving our differences. I could never persuade her to consider this change of tactic. One hope I had was that a public discussion about ambivalence might help me understand how people in general think about it and why my attempts to communicate this idea to my ex had failed.

Does this make any sense to anyone?


No, it doesn't make sense Ambrose.

What you word in a way to make you appear super reasonable is in fact SUPER LOADED by infering all sorts of stuff. THAT's why it is perceived as an attack and falls on deaf ears. Because emotional blackmail and manipulation have NEVER been the way to communicate honestly within a relationship, whatever its kind and whatever stage it's at. Genuine discussions should NOT be loaded and should be completely transparent.


Usually, when asking for advice, one should pay attention to what one doesn't want to hear, not to what re-inforces our already preconceived ideas and fits nicely with what we've chosen to believe. Otherwise, one would not be asking for advice, but for validation. 2 completely different things which are prompted by completely different motivations. Both are ok. As long as one is clear what the motivation is AND whether one is looking for validation or advice. Kidding oneself that one is looking for advice when in fact one is looking for validation, isn't going to help resolve anything (within or outwards). Honesty with self is the first step towards resolve. Without it, one keeps on going in ever decreasing circles.

IMO
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 21, 2011 8:29 AM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
BB_snickers: Ah, power dynamics. I do hate that anthem, all anthems actually. What else do you do on those drives? Surely there's time to sing a happy song or two? Aside from the hyperbole introduced, if this was a question of power dynamics (for me, since I don't do, quote 'normal' relationships) then indeed that balance of power would not be thwarted at any cost. I can just see the steely glares now.

It might be note worthy to say however that surrender is love. Love cannot be experienced in a state of control.
What you've termed realistic and unrealistic is subjective I would think J. I'm not sure the outcome is necessarily what you conclude either. (affirming the consequent is falacy) I would suggest that the above scenario is heavily weighted in power dynamics, rather than an attempt to facilitate disassociation.

It would seem to me that when one wants to disassociate the simplest of avenues is to stop talking altogether. Granted some folk don't do things in simplicity very often. Power dynamics would however create all manner of crazy objectives that seem unrealistic to others; but I doubt disassociation would be one of them.


well first, no one should be forcing anyone to do anything - if someone wants to hop a train to visit it should be a mutually agreed upon & positive experience

second, yes I think people will sometimes sabotage a relationship by offerring up ridiculous demands OR (and I think this happens more often) by dong things to purposely tick off the other person in hopes they will simply stop communicating

also out of fear of commitment that's not always because of negative thoughts about relationships - but in fear of being hurt. people will sometimes unconciously sabotage their chances < this is something I have done
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 21, 2011 8:59 AM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
BB_snickers
BB_snickersBB_snickersNarnia, Ontario Canada56 Threads 3,755 Posts
GrammarGirl: I just received an email from my ex demanding an apology for my post on this thread. I don't believe I owe him one. In fact, I believe HE should apologize to me for starting this and other painful threads about our personal business.

I know how much he values your opinions as he keeps coming back for them again and again.

So here is my question - Does he deserve an apology for my post?


I can tell you that I deserve a pizza. (and maybe some beer, Canadian of course)

I think you both deserve an apology, to and from each other. All this 'holding' of positions for control is detrimental to you both. I guess if detriment doesn't bother either of you, then my point is moot.

The more time that both of you spend on squeezing out every last ounce of apology, every last ounce of pride and every last ounce of sanity, is equivalent to the amount of time it will take you both to recover your own essence as loving individuals. You can't destroy other people, you can only destroy your self, though truthfully you can help each other in synchronicity to self destruct.

There is, and will always be interplay between emotion and logic. Both parties used phrases and terms that cast the other in unfavorable light, when in truth there is no wrong in emotion, no wrong in logic. What is wrong is treating emotion and or logic, as wrong.

Your own brain is made up of a logical, linear side (left brain) and a conceptual, emotional side (right brain). When you speak ill of either logic or emotion, you are in effect telling your own brain to attack the side you 'think' is wrong. Oh I can't live with that stupid emotion, oh I can't live with that stupid logic. <-- your brain hating itself...aka you.

You are not engaging in just mutual self destruction, you both are literally self destructing. You may be thinking your battle is with each other; but it is not, you have simply agreed albeit unwittingly in mutual self destruction.

This is a truly awesome event really, a union of two minds harmonized for destruction. Yes I said harmonized. Weird huh. Whether you guys realize it or not, you are both doing things (and lovingly at that) for one another in every moment you spend together. It's just a matter of what you want to build cos even destruction is building something, perhaps ill health or lousy self esteem, but something nevertheless.

So destroy or build you two! You actually do have choice. You actually are manifesting your future with every word you choose and you actually are in an awesome synchronicity with each other aiding and abetting, ... and enabling a common goal.

In response to: Please weigh in here so we can put this to rest once and for all!


Ah, the mind never rests, it only finds what it perceives and believes to be restful.

Now, where's my pizza dammit!!?



bouquet
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 21, 2011 9:39 AM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
one should apologize if there is an offence -even if it was not intentional, by refusing it implies that the other person's feeling were not important. So yes, if an apology was requested, I think it should have been forwarded and this is one more reason why I think this relationship was toxic for Ambrose
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 21, 2011 9:49 AM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
EagleWoman
EagleWomanEagleWomanMalaga, Andalusia Spain22 Threads 4,719 Posts
felixis99: one should apologize if there is an offence -even if it was not intentional, by refusing it implies that the other person's feeling were not important. So yes, if an apology was requested, I think it should have been forwarded and this is one more reason why I think this relationship was toxic for Ambrose


Wow!!! You must know both of them very well to be able to make such accurate and decisive judgements
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 21, 2011 9:53 AM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
BB_snickers
BB_snickersBB_snickersNarnia, Ontario Canada56 Threads 3,755 Posts
felixis99: well first, no one should be forcing anyone to do anything - if someone wants to hop a train to visit it should be a mutually agreed upon & positive experience


There is partial truth in this depending on the 'depth' of the relationship. For instance a recently met acquaintance would fall into your statement guidelines. A deeper relationship requires at least one to be in control. Viewing it as being forced is I think, a poor line of thought that speaks more to whether or not one is a more dominant or submissive personality.

The universe functions on opposites and it does so rather majestically. To rule out someone being in 'control' is to rule out life 'force' itself. Frankly I think humans have gotten so lost over what they think is obnoxious control that they may never really find love because they want control more. (wanting control is the same as not wanting to be controlled) They must co-exist, love and control. People tend to miss a great deal of the things that ARE controlling them, things that speak very much of a lack of self control.

In response to:
second, yes I think people will sometimes sabotage a relationship by offerring up ridiculous demands OR (and I think this happens more often) by dong things to purposely tick off the other person in hopes they will simply stop communicating


The universe is synchronicity. It takes two always. The underlined part is total right brain thinking smile Logic would say - you want to stop talking with someone, you just stop talking, otherwise something else is controlling one's need to respond. (maybe an emotion) There's that ugly control word again. giggle It just goes unnoticed by the conscious mind.

In response to:
also out of fear of commitment that's not always because of negative thoughts about relationships - but in fear of being hurt. people will sometimes unconciously sabotage their chances < this is something I have done


Oh ya. applause More right brained thinking. Women are soooo womany. bouquet Oddly you can't do this on your own any more than you can fall in love on your own. The other person has to buy into it, either consciously or not.

What is problematic in normal relationships (jmo) is that control dynamics are rarely discussed and arranged beforehand, leaving both parties with a struggle for power when those random moments, of who should win or get to choose, arrive. Me thinks it is the downfall of most marriages/significant relationships. Failure to plan, is a plan to fail and all that. cool
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 21, 2011 10:06 AM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
EagleWoman
EagleWomanEagleWomanMalaga, Andalusia Spain22 Threads 4,719 Posts
BB_snickers: There is partial truth in this depending on the 'depth' of the relationship. For instance a recently met acquaintance would fall into your statement guidelines. A deeper relationship requires at least one to be in control. Viewing it as being forced is I think, a poor line of thought that speaks more to whether or not one is a more dominant or submissive personality.

The universe functions on opposites and it does so rather majestically. To rule out someone being in 'control' is to rule out life 'force' itself. Frankly I think humans have gotten so lost over what they think is obnoxious control that they may never really find love because they want control more. (wanting control is the same as not wanting to be controlled) They must co-exist, love and control. People tend to miss a great deal of the things that ARE controlling them, things that speak very much of a lack of self control.
The universe is synchronicity. It takes two always. The underlined part is total right brain thinking Logic would say - you want to stop talking with someone, you just stop talking, otherwise something else is controlling one's need to respond. (maybe an emotion) There's that ugly control word again. It just goes unnoticed by the conscious mind.
Oh ya. More right brained thinking. Women are soooo womany. Oddly you can't do this on your own any more than you can fall in love on your own. The other person has to buy into it, either consciously or not.

What is problematic in normal relationships (jmo) is that control dynamics are rarely discussed and arranged beforehand, leaving both parties with a struggle for power when those random moments, of who should win or get to choose, arrive. Me thinks it is the downfall of most marriages/significant relationships. Failure to plan, is a plan to fail and all that.


You've mentioned many times about the downfall of most "normal relationships" is the fact that who has (ultimate) controle within the relationship has not been established.

Are you telling me that relationships where one is dominant and the other subserviant are very successful? Why are you on CS? Why are there soooooooooooo many peeps out there also looking for "non-notmal" relationships? Surely the first one they got into should still be going strong and the happy couple should be either "mastering" or "serving" with a big happy smile on their faces dunno
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jun 21, 2011 10:12 AM CST Ambivalence: Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay
Ambrose2007
Ambrose2007Ambrose2007BFE, South Dakota USA67 Threads 10 Polls 8,881 Posts
EagleWoman: No, it doesn't make sense Ambrose.

What you word in a way to make you appear super reasonable is in fact SUPER LOADED by infering all sorts of stuff. THAT's why it is perceived as an attack and falls on deaf ears. Because emotional blackmail and manipulation have NEVER been the way to communicate honestly within a relationship, whatever its kind and whatever stage it's at. Genuine discussions should NOT be loaded and should be completely transparent. Usually, when asking for advice, one should pay attention to what one doesn't want to hear, not to what re-inforces our already preconceived ideas and fits nicely with what we've chosen to believe. Otherwise, one would not be asking for advice, but for validation. 2 completely different things which are prompted by completely different motivations. Both are ok. As long as one is clear what the motivation is AND whether one is looking for validation or advice. Kidding oneself that one is looking for advice when in fact one is looking for validation, isn't going to help resolve anything (within or outwards). Honesty with self is the first step towards resolve. Without it, one keeps on going in ever decreasing circles.

IMO


That's really way too vague - that is, completely lacking in substantiation - for me to truly know what you're saying, and thus to respond to it, Eagle. In other words, you're making a bunch of general statements without showing any specific arguments that I've done what you're claiming in your general statements. dunno confused
------ This thread is Archived ------
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

This Thread is Archived

This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.

« Go back to All Threads
Message #318

Share this Thread

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here