SandraYelitzza2: Sure not, but it can be excessive if done everyday for instance (wouldn't doubt that)... But u sweat ur own money Lindsy, u deserve those pants now, u earn ur own money, presidents cannot use the people's money for personal use, yes they have their own salary, but im pretty sure they like to use our money too. And not forgetting wen Obama spent 3,000 dollars on three tuxedos, that were 1,000 dollars each. <--- People were furious about this, after all... who wouldn't be??
lindsyjones: Well it looks like this concludes our discussion about why women should or shouldn't be a leader.
Thanks all for your participation.
lol! your little tirade is another reason! There are more important issues with leadership then gossiping about $60.00 shirts. Still...you have a pretty amusing argument. It was good for a laugh at least. while you're all puffed up and feeling insulted you should Google Alison Redford (also known around here as Alison Redfraud) she had to resign for spending a little bit more than $60.00 of taxpayers money for a shirt. A fine example of female "leadership" I must say!
michael63ca: lol! your little tirade is another reason! There are more important issues with leadership then gossiping about $60.00 shirts. Still...you have a pretty amusing argument. It was good for a laugh at least. while you're all puffed up and feeling insulted you should Google Alison Redford (also known around here as Alison Redfraud) she had to resign for spending a little bit more than $60.00 of taxpayers money for a shirt. A fine example of female "leadership" I must say!
michael63ca: lol! your little tirade is another reason! There are more important issues with leadership then gossiping about $60.00 shirts. Still...you have a pretty amusing argument. It was good for a laugh at least. while you're all puffed up and feeling insulted you should Google Alison Redford (also known around here as Alison Redfraud) she had to resign for spending a little bit more than $60.00 of taxpayers money for a shirt. A fine example of female "leadership" I must say!
michael63ca: lol! your little tirade is another reason! There are more important issues with leadership then gossiping about $60.00 shirts. Still...you have a pretty amusing argument. It was good for a laugh at least. while you're all puffed up and feeling insulted you should Google Alison Redford (also known around here as Alison Redfraud) she had to resign for spending a little bit more than $60.00 of taxpayers money for a shirt. A fine example of female "leadership" I must say!
Man is not in anyway different about gossiping anyways.
my point is ...Believing women could be better leaders just because they are women is laughable and already proven to be wrong - headed thinking. In fact, we found out things got WORSE, not better!
michael63ca: my point is ...Believing women could be better leaders just because they are women is laughable and already proven to be wrong - headed thinking. In fact, we found out things got WORSE, not better!
Can you please provide clarification as to who's leadership in women have we had the displeasure of failure?
lindsyjones: Can you please provide clarification as to who's leadership in women have we had the displeasure of failure?
Be specific?
And if you took the time to read the whole thread, you'd discover that just because Z woman's a woman and therefore should be a good leader. FIRST THERE'S A consensus of the fact that Obama is not as effective as predicted and or expected, second, that since the failures of such an administrator is very deeply felt specially in the foreign policy of handling imminent threats of terrorism as well as local policies including but not limited to immigration and border problems as well as health care. Now if you don’t feel those mitigated and exacerbated challenges, you're simply living in your own comfort which, I may add, make you the lucky exception to the disgruntled majority, where I belong.
lindsyjones: And if you took the time to read the whole thread, you'd discover that just because Z woman's a woman and therefore should be a good leader. FIRST THERE'S A consensus of the fact that Obama is not as effective as predicted and or expected, second, that since the failures of such an administrator is very deeply felt specially in the foreign policy of handling imminent threats of terrorism as well as local policies including but not limited to immigration and border problems as well as health care. Now if you don’t feel those mitigated and exacerbated challenges, you're simply living in your own comfort which, I may add, make you the lucky exception to the disgruntled majority, where I belong.
Now that u mentioned that, Obama wanted to allow foreigners to "freely" live in the US (bad idea). <--- Congress hasn't allowed this to happen. But before he allows foreigners to come and live in the US, he needs to make sure that Americans r allowed to live in those countries too. (e.g. Getting jobs there, having a family there...) What do u think is goin to happen if the US government allows immigrants to live in the US while us citizens cannot live in these immigrant's native land?? <--- The US is gonna go downfall with a huge amount of population, there would be lack of jobs... many people... lack of houses to live in.... In other words, chaos... I'd say for Obama's "brilliant" ideas...
SandraYelitzza2: Now that u mentioned that, Obama wanted to allow foreigners to "freely" live in the US (bad idea). <--- Congress hasn't allowed this to happen. But before he allows foreigners to come and live in the US, he needs to make sure that Americans r allowed to live in those countries too. (e.g. Getting jobs there, having a family there...) What do u think is goin to happen if the US government allows immigrants to live in the US while us citizens cannot live in these immigrant's native land?? <--- The US is gonna go downfall with a huge amount of population, there would be lack of jobs... many people... lack of houses to live in.... In other words, chaos... I'd say for Obama's "brilliant" ideas...
What a great analogy my friend, this is reverse situation. The thing is, while I don't blame these violators, for applying for the human capabilities of survival, it is our prime obligation to protect our borders and upon finding them to be illegal, then act appropriately according to our laws, and deport them.
Now if the expense doing this is causing more aggravation on our economic costs, then invest on the border control.
lindsyjones: What a great analogy my friend, this is reverse situation. The thing is, while I don't blame these violators, for applying for the human capabilities of survival, it is our prime obligation to protect our borders and upon finding them to be illegal, then act appropriately according to our laws, and deport them.
Now if the expense doing this is causing more aggravation on our economic costs, then invest on the border control.
And certainly, I don't think there's anything wrong with them having a life in the US... as long as, we have full access to their country as well.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
For your information Michael, every move and every expense our leaders do is subject to scrutiny. GOSSIP?
How dare you label this, it's a matter of concern for public to know the kind of representation our officials do.
Gossip is when the media sensationalized why Johnny Depp's hand is injured. ..
What on earth is that?
After reading how seriously we have presented our position why women is to be elected officials and this is your judgment?
Give us a break, will you?