Your Guess What Happened to Flight 370 ( Archived) (37)

"Under the sand...."??
An old 'detective series called Banacek with George Peppard, had that already as a plot line...try again, but not hiding it underwater, that was Operation Thunderball; Jamesie Bondy to da rescue of a nuclear armed British Fighter jet...and it's not on the Moon either; The Globe used that several years ago, with 'photos' of a B29 on the Moon's surface...

"Under the sand in the Middle East" is a lame underestimation.

We, the Middle Eastern, hide airplanes in our pockets and pack pyramids in our backbags.

A Good laugh is correct; we are basically to Article 19 of the UN Charter of Human Rights ,which most here seem to totally ignore and ,in fact, hold in contempt, especially when anyone expresses a view/ opinion contrary to the herd view of things. The implication that to post an opinion, one MUST be PC to the prevailing herd driven viewpoint.
Article 19 of the UN Charter on Human Rights reads: :Everyone has the right of Freedom of opinion and expression. This right includes Freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through media and regardless of frontiers."
Perhaps the various herds of Borg types that insist one must comply to the prevailing views have a totally different version though searching for it has proven unsuccessful. One must then imagine what it could read like, for instance: "Everyone has the right to Freedom of opinion and expression only if it is in full compliance of the majority view which is mandatory and not subject to violation of majority viewpoints on any and all subjects. This Right includes freedom to hold opinions but not to post them for if one does, retribution in the usual forms of bullying will commence. One may not imp art non majority views, information or ideas contrary to the afore mentioned herd driven PC opinions. regardless of any moral right or wrong. Poster will obey and comply or be driven away."
Such is the climate for 'controversial topics' as some see and or experience them, seemingly, especially by those who are the first and loudest in proclaiming the right to expression of opinion on any topic. Seems to be an old, old complaint by many here in reading older posts as well as newer ones. I loathe conformity and intellectual terrorism and those who demand it.

I am really starting to believe the "COWBOYS" brought it down in the ocean.

Wouldn't it be nice if we could debate issues rather than resorting to personal attacks?

You are trying to make a guessing game out of such a tragedy? What a sad sick person you are.
If a member of your family were on board would you be posting this? You should be removed from here.

You are trying to make a guessing game out of such a tragedy? What a sad sick person you are.
If a member of your family were on board would you be posting this? You should be removed from here.

Who are you talking to? The quote button is very useful

That is a dream that belongs, unfortunately, in "Never-never Land' as the post above testifies to; the immediate knee-jerk of resorting to name calling.
Whether it be posters or politicians, it would be heartening in this day and age for all who 'speak' in public to show some temerity and actually stand up for their beliefs, regardless of how offensive they may be. To take offence is being subjective. Immediately disowning statements almost as soon as they are made, is rather childish pandering and shows an intellectual shortcoming if one cannot stand by one's true beliefs, even if they do cause offence. (The only ones that come to mind for that are the group of the Westboro Church, which in most cases against them, the courts have ruled in their favour!
I see no reason why an offensive position or remark made in earnest should ever become defensive. Stand your ground or is that saying only applicable in Florida...:laugh