aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada528 posts
Albertaghost: Nope. Washers. They can be used in both applications Aspen. Strange. This report from a source with a heck of a lot more credibility than you says the opposite.
AlbertaghostCultural Wasteland, Alberta Canada5,914 posts
aspen12: JUST WHO PAID FOR THAT POLL , YOU POLL IS ONLY GOOD IF IT DOESNT COST ANYONE YOU CAN MAKE A POLL GO ANY WAY YOU WANT IT FOLLOWS MONEY
Says it in the top left of the link Aspen. That's why I provided it so that you can find out this sort of information. I's a poll company who conduct these things and get paid no matter how it goes.
So, let's see your poll which says more than half of people think 91q1q was an inside job.
aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada528 posts
Albertaghost: Nope. Washers. They can be used in both applications Aspen. Strange. This report from a source with a heck of a lot more credibility than you says the opposite.
aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada528 posts
Albertaghost: Nope. Washers. They can be used in both applications Aspen. Strange. This report from a source with a heck of a lot more credibility than you says the opposite.
aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada528 posts
Albertaghost: Says it in the top left of the link Aspen. That's why I provided it so that you can find out this sort of information. I's a poll company who conduct these things and get paid no matter how it goes.
So, let's see your poll which says more than half of people think 91q1q was an inside job.
AlbertaghostCultural Wasteland, Alberta Canada5,914 posts
aspen12: I WOULD SOONER BELIEVE IN MY POLL CONNECTING SINGLES THAN PAID FOR BIAS ONE MR ANGUS REID AND MY ONE A WIDER AUDIENCE THE WORLD
Oh I'm sure you would however, your poll is contaminated by the fact that anybody at any time can vote and, it's sample methodology is somewhat primitive. Angus Reid is probably one of the most reputable poll taking firms in the world - a poll on a conspiracy thread on a singles site run by a guy who uses poor grammar and cannot provide any proof of his truther contentions is somewhat suspect to say the least.
aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada528 posts
Albertaghost: Oh I'm sure you would however, your poll is contaminated by the fact that anybody at any time can vote and, it's sample methodology is somewhat primitive. Angus Reid is probably one of the most reputable poll taking firms in the world - a poll on a conspiracy thread on a singles site run by a guy who uses poor grammar and cannot provide any proof of his truther contentions is somewhat suspect to say the least.
TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD.YOU CAN ONLY VOTE ONCE AND TAKES OVER PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD NOW THATS DEMOCRACY
AlbertaghostCultural Wasteland, Alberta Canada5,914 posts
aspen12: TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD.YOU CAN ONLY VOTE ONCE AND TAKES OVER PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD NOW THATS DEMOCRACY AGREMENT IS NOT YOUR VOCABULARY
Certainly is but, people who come to a conspiracy thread are people who either believe in a conspiracy or, those that don't. In other words, your fluff poll is going to naturally attract an abnormal proportion of truthers.
Here, maybe the Muslims can talk some sense into you as only seven percent of them agree with you in this NYT poll;
""Among the poll's other disturbing findings was that only 40 percent of U.S. Muslims believe that Arabs carried out the 9/11 attacks. Another 28 percent don't believe it - and 32 percent said they had no view.
Among 28 percent who doubted that Arabs were behind the conspiracy, one-fourth claim the U.S. government was responsible.""
aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada528 posts
Albertaghost: Certainly is but, people who come to a conspiracy thread are people who either believe in a conspiracy or, those that don't. In other words, your fluff poll is going to naturally attract an abnormal proportion of truthers.
Here, maybe the Muslims can talk some sense into you as only seven percent of them agree with you in this NYT poll;
""Among the poll's other disturbing findings was that only 40 percent of U.S. Muslims believe that Arabs carried out the 9/11 attacks. Another 28 percent don't believe it - and 32 percent said they had no view.
Among 28 percent who doubted that Arabs were behind the conspiracy, one-fourth claim the U.S. government was responsible.""
AlbertaghostCultural Wasteland, Alberta Canada5,914 posts
aspen12: YOU BELEIVE WHAT YOU DESIRE I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THAT JUST DONT SCARE PEOPLE AWAY THATS WHAT I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH AND THOSE PLASTIC WASHERS
You believe what you want and I have a problem with molten steel as there was none.
aspen12: AND WHAT POLL AND WHERE WAS IT TAKEN WHAT AND WHERE PART OF TOWN
TO ME MY POLL IS THE BEST AND HONEST
PEW. I provided a link so once you click on it, look around and it will tell you.
As for your poll being honest, what is the accuracy rating and how is it controlled to ensure that people with two or more identities don't vote and, that a completely random selection of CS users voted?
To be precise, analysis of the WTC dust proves that the incendiary used in 911 was not common commercial thermite as seen in the video above but even more powerful variations of thermite known as "super-thermite" and "thermate". These burn through steel so rapidly that the result is better described as an explosion than a fire.
The end products of an explosive thermite reaction are liquid iron, clouds of white smoke and ash and intense heat that would reduce to dust and ash any wood, plastic, sheet metal, or concrete in the blast area.
Here too, the white heat of an exothermic thermite reaction explains the disappearance of all that matter that would certainly have been present had the buildings merely collapsed.
Watch this video and notice the molten metal pouring out of the building just prior to its final explosion and ask yourself, 'would strong buildings collapse totally into dust from top to bottom due to a fire that only involved a few floors more than 80 stories up?'
At the beginning of this video you can actually see a thermite reaction in progress and molten metal streaming from the WTC prior to the final explosion.
To be precise, analysis of the WTC dust proves that the incendiary used in 911 was not common commercial thermite as seen in the video above but even more powerful variations of thermite known as "super-thermite" and "thermate". These burn through steel so rapidly that the result is better described as an explosion than a fire.
The end products of an explosive thermite reaction are liquid iron, clouds of white smoke and ash and intense heat that would reduce to dust and ash any wood, plastic, sheet metal, or concrete in the blast area.
Here too, the white heat of an exothermic thermite reaction explains the disappearance of all that matter that would certainly have been present had the buildings merely collapsed.
Watch this video and notice the molten metal pouring out of the building just prior to its final explosion and ask yourself, 'would strong buildings collapse totally into dust from top to bottom due to a fire that only involved a few floors more than 80 stories up?'
At the beginning of this video you can actually see a thermite reaction in progress and molten metal streaming from the WTC prior to the final explosion.
Since you seem to be enjoying this information so much Conrad, let me elaborate a little bit more on two compounds, superthermite and thermate, both of which were used in the demolition of the WTC.
Thermate is thermite plus sulfur. The sulfur acts as a flux agent to lower the melting point of steel and speed up the thermite reaction.
Super thermite is thermite in which the aluminum and iron oxide particles have been ground down to nano-particulate size. The particles are a thousand times smaller than for normal thermite. This greatly speeds up the reaction time and results in an explosive reaction instead of just a rapid burning.
These products can both be painted onto steel beams in advance and used to shape the melting process when the thermite reaction is in progress.
By this means, along with shaped explosive charges, the dynamics of a building's collapse can be controlled, allowing the building to fall into its own footprint.
There is very clear evidence of the use of these products at the WTC. That evidence includes crystallization of steel with traces of sulfur and clear physical evidence that beams were cut in very specific ways.
I quote bin Laden...."We did not believe the towers would fall."
Such a statement is both admittance of planning the attack. Also a statement of precognitive thought of what the act would ultimately cause. It show a group in conspiracy of the deeds that discussed the events after the aircraft impacts. .
Like loading a gun with bullets, that later is used in a murder. The act of loading the gun is a precognitive act to making the gun lethal.
I know GWB forced the video taped words from him, by twisting his arm. Or giving bin Laden a waterboarding in a cave in Afghanistan....
OH..EITs were not used then, you say?......rats. Just another US gov't conspriracy theory down the drain. 911 truthers are so mixed up on the timeline of events of the last 10 years, they can say anything. That is what revisionist history will get you.....
RayfromUSA: Since you seem to be enjoying this information so much Conrad, let me elaborate a little bit more on two compounds, superthermite and thermate, both of which were used in the demolition of the WTC.
Thermate is thermite plus sulfur. The sulfur acts as a flux agent to lower the melting point of steel and speed up the thermite reaction.
Super thermite is thermite in which the aluminum and iron oxide particles have been ground down to nano-particulate size. The particles are a thousand times smaller than for normal thermite. This greatly speeds up the reaction time and results in an explosive reaction instead of just a rapid burning.
These products can both be painted onto steel beams in advance and used to shape the melting process when the thermite reaction is in progress.By this means, along with shaped explosive charges, the dynamics of a building's collapse can be controlled, allowing the building to fall into its own footprint.
There is very clear evidence of the use of these products at the WTC. That evidence includes crystallization of steel with traces of sulfur and clear physical evidence that beams were cut in very specific ways.
RayfromUSA: Since you seem to be enjoying this information so much Conrad, let me elaborate a little bit more on two compounds, superthermite and thermate, both of which were used in the demolition of the WTC.
Thermate is thermite plus sulfur. The sulfur acts as a flux agent to lower the melting point of steel and speed up the thermite reaction.
Super thermite is thermite in which the aluminum and iron oxide particles have been ground down to nano-particulate size. The particles are a thousand times smaller than for normal thermite. This greatly speeds up the reaction time and results in an explosive reaction instead of just a rapid burning.
These products can both be painted onto steel beams in advance and used to shape the melting process when the thermite reaction is in progress.By this means, along with shaped explosive charges, the dynamics of a building's collapse can be controlled, allowing the building to fall into its own footprint.
There is very clear evidence of the use of these products at the WTC. That evidence includes crystallization of steel with traces of sulfur and clear physical evidence that beams were cut in very specific ways.
aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada528 posts
RayfromUSA: Since you seem to be enjoying this information so much Conrad, let me elaborate a little bit more on two compounds, superthermite and thermate, both of which were used in the demolition of the WTC.
Thermate is thermite plus sulfur. The sulfur acts as a flux agent to lower the melting point of steel and speed up the thermite reaction.
Super thermite is thermite in which the aluminum and iron oxide particles have been ground down to nano-particulate size. The particles are a thousand times smaller than for normal thermite. This greatly speeds up the reaction time and results in an explosive reaction instead of just a rapid burning.
These products can both be painted onto steel beams in advance and used to shape the melting process when the thermite reaction is in progress.By this means, along with shaped explosive charges, the dynamics of a building's collapse can be controlled, allowing the building to fall into its own footprint.
There is very clear evidence of the use of these products at the WTC. That evidence includes crystallization of steel with traces of sulfur and clear physical evidence that beams were cut in very specific ways.
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, upon this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived, and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met here on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of it as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
But in a larger sense we can not dedicate - we can not consecrate - we can not hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled, here, have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember, what we say here, but can never forget what they did here.
It is for us, the living, rather to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they have, thus far, so nobly carried on. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us - that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they here gave the last full measure of devotion - that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain; that this nation shall have a new birth of freedom; and that this government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
RayfromUSA: Since you seem to be enjoying this information so much Conrad, let me elaborate a little bit more on two compounds, superthermite and thermate, both of which were used in the demolition of the WTC.
Thermate is thermite plus sulfur. The sulfur acts as a flux agent to lower the melting point of steel and speed up the thermite reaction.
Super thermite is thermite in which the aluminum and iron oxide particles have been ground down to nano-particulate size. The particles are a thousand times smaller than for normal thermite. This greatly speeds up the reaction time and results in an explosive reaction instead of just a rapid burning.
These products can both be painted onto steel beams in advance and used to shape the melting process when the thermite reaction is in progress.By this means, along with shaped explosive charges, the dynamics of a building's collapse can be controlled, allowing the building to fall into its own footprint.
There is very clear evidence of the use of these products at the WTC. That evidence includes crystallization of steel with traces of sulfur and clear physical evidence that beams were cut in very specific ways.
"The scientific paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe provides, quite simply, proof that explosives were used in the destruction of the Twin Towers." -
dezertfox4323: No. 9/11 was done by osama bin laden and mostly Khalid Shiek Muhammed. look it up if you dont believe me, or better yet read the commision report. anyone who believes it was some sort of government conspiracy are the same people that believe in santa clause and the easter bunny.
And for the people that believe it was a government conspiracy... they need
Conrad73: All the Help would be too late for them! They've gone over the Top!
In a sad way you got to love the way they talk about 9/11 being an inside job they really do put in alot off effort into showing us how crazy they all are
MysteryGuitarMan: In a sad way you got to love the way they talk about 9/11 being an inside job they really do put in alot off effort into showing us how crazy they all are
Conrad73: You named ACHMED?ACHMED is definitely the better Comedian than you,even dead!
LMAO and watched the ACHMED skit 5 times. I thought the symbolic humor of having a talking suicide bomber as a skeleton with a turban was so 'dead on' that is has to go into the American Humor Hall Of Fame.
When the dummy...e.r. suicide bomber lost his feet....I was rolling on the floor. Not doing a duck and cover mind you. But trying to recover from the laughter.
Just remember the skit...the next time....you are stared down by a guy....with a turban on.....that continuously says...."I Will Kill You". If you start to giggle in his face and he get even more angry.....just tell him you saw it done on a Conrad video and it most definitely worked for the Americans croud. That you are not sure why he has such a bee up his bonnet and cannot enjoy life and let other enjoy theirs.
ttom500: LMAO and watched the ACHMED skit 5 times. I thought the symbolic humor of having a talking suicide bomber as a skeleton with a turban was so 'dead on' that is has to go into the American Humor Hall Of Fame.
When the dummy...e.r. suicide bomber lost his feet....I was rolling on the floor. Not doing a duck and cover mind you. But trying to recover from the laughter.
Just remember the skit...the next time....you are stared down by a guy....with a turban on.....that continuously says...."I Will Kill You". If you start to giggle in his face and he get even more angry.....just tell him you saw it done on a Conrad video and it most definitely worked for the Americans croud. That you are not sure why he has such a bee up his bonnet and cannot enjoy life and let other enjoy theirs.
Watched it quite a few times and still find it funny!
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Strange. This report from a source with a heck of a lot more credibility than you says the opposite.
JUST WHO PAID FOR THAT POLL , YOU
POLL IS ONLY GOOD IF IT DOESNT COST ANYONE
YOU CAN MAKE A POLL GO ANY WAY YOU WANT IT FOLLOWS MONEY