Do you beleive 9\11 was a inside job/? (616)
gardenhackle: It's all so obvious. How could anyone ever deny this is how it really happened?
Tell you!
Great article 
The logic behind the whole hypothesis is utterly ridiculous
The logic behind the whole hypothesis is utterly ridiculous lol, the one story i remember reading which made me laugh, was people trying to argue that the planes didn't exist, they were infact.......holograms......
*not kidding either, google it*
*not kidding either, google it*
Indigo_Flow: lol, the one story i remember reading which made me laugh, was people trying to argue that the planes didn't exist, they were infact.......holograms......
*not kidding either, google it*
*not kidding either, google it*
It would be gut-bustingly funny that there were so many people in this country who believe this sort of unimaginably absurd insanity if those people weren't also eligible to vote. That wrecks the delightful humor of it all, making it more disturbing and creepy than funny.
Indigo_Flow: lol, the one story i remember reading which made me laugh, was people trying to argue that the planes didn't exist, they were infact.......holograms......
*not kidding either, google it*
*not kidding either, google it*
Sure looked like a big hole the size and shape of a aircraft to me in the world trade center.
Maybe 911 truthers think that it was lazer attack from a invisible Klingon Bird of Prey that did it.....were was Jame Kirk when we needed him?
Looking at the poll numbers, one might draw the conclusion that half the people in this country believe 9/11 was an inside job.
# YES 46 46%
# NO 46 46%
# I COULDNT SAY 5 5%
# MAY BE 4 4%
But that would be an invalid conclusion. I suggest the numbers reflect the penchant nutcases have for sharing their insanity, causing an extremely high and very possibly 100% response rate while sane people were more likely to roll their eyes and blow off the the whole thing with no response at all, causing a very very low response rate.
The 9 out of 100 that booked "I couldn't say" or "may be" are the hardest to explain. They took the time to post a response but haven't been able to examine the entire theory and draw any conclusion about how likely or unlikely it may be.
I feel safer betting my life on the FACT that 9/11 had nothing whatsoever to do with US government conspiracy than I feel betting my life on the fact that brakes make a car slow down when you press on them. And I feel safe enough about that to bet my life on it for two hours a day every single workday and who knows how many hours on weekeends. So... yeah.... I won't embarrass myself by voting "could be" or "I don't know" even if I'm the only one that would know I'd cast a vote for such a vacuous position on the subject.
# YES 46 46%
# NO 46 46%
# I COULDNT SAY 5 5%
# MAY BE 4 4%
But that would be an invalid conclusion. I suggest the numbers reflect the penchant nutcases have for sharing their insanity, causing an extremely high and very possibly 100% response rate while sane people were more likely to roll their eyes and blow off the the whole thing with no response at all, causing a very very low response rate.
The 9 out of 100 that booked "I couldn't say" or "may be" are the hardest to explain. They took the time to post a response but haven't been able to examine the entire theory and draw any conclusion about how likely or unlikely it may be.
I feel safer betting my life on the FACT that 9/11 had nothing whatsoever to do with US government conspiracy than I feel betting my life on the fact that brakes make a car slow down when you press on them. And I feel safe enough about that to bet my life on it for two hours a day every single workday and who knows how many hours on weekeends. So... yeah.... I won't embarrass myself by voting "could be" or "I don't know" even if I'm the only one that would know I'd cast a vote for such a vacuous position on the subject.
Ralphy and TTom, I don't know what you think is so funny but your one of many brainwashed living dead to not know 911 was perpetrated by the traitors in Washington. ================================================================= Back in 1993 the FBI was found in court to have given the bomb and detonators to the Arabs on their first attempt at 911 back then. And in April of 1996 the FBI and the ATF committed that bombing in Oklahoma. The FBI also murdered at least 76 men, women and children in Waco based on false information. And lets bring up Ruby Ridge where an FBI marksman murdered Randy Weaver's wife as she held a baby in her hand. ================================================================= But yet you brain dead morons expect me to believe that our government doesn't commit terrorism against it's own people? Are you nuts? They have been doing it for years. All you have to do is check out the Gulf of Tonkin incident where McNamara and others lied about Vietnamese Fishermen firing on a American Patrol boat. Thus you had 3 million Vietnamese murdered by our military to boost the stock options for the share holders of the military industrial complex. ================================================================= And recently you have the phoney so called war in Iraq begun by a great lie by Bush, Rumsfeld and Chaney and sold to the American people via the stinking zionist news media. Hence the 1.4 million dead Iraqi's murdered on the alter of the White House's god of war, Satan himself. But you blind and dead could never figure this out could you? So keep right on laughing your evil is apparent.
If it really was a government conspiracy, they did a better job at that than they have done at anything else.
conrad, you are either a well decieved man or the biggest liar on the planet. I believe your a great liar though. There are more people finding without a doubt that 911 was an inside job but you just go on rattling your lies because many of us know better. ================================================================= Many sources of information are out there for all to see. Just go to Datehookup.com a free site and read the thread in the forum post," 911 the truth you don't know about 911 " by eagleeyes. Go to Alex Jones site, infowars.com, and go to Powerofprophecy.com or conspiracyworld.com. 911 was without doubt one of many acts of domestic terrorism perpetrated by the White House and the terrorist nation of Israel behind the scenes pulling the strings. And no God will not help us. No sir as a matter of fact God is going to punish America and Israel as well. And these two monsters are very deserving of all the damnation by God for their evil.
gilbertpaul: conrad, you are either a well decieved man or the biggest liar on the planet. I believe your a great liar though. There are more people finding without a doubt that 911 was an inside job but you just go on rattling your lies because many of us know better. ================================================================= Many sources of information are out there for all to see. Just go to Datehookup.com a free site and read the thread in the forum post," 911 the truth you don't know about 911 " by eagleeyes. Go to Alex Jones site, infowars.com, and go to Powerofprophecy.com or conspiracyworld.com. 911 was without doubt one of many acts of domestic terrorism perpetrated by the White House and the terrorist nation of Israel behind the scenes pulling the strings. And no God will not help us. No sir as a matter of fact God is going to punish America and Israel as well. And these two monsters are very deserving of all the damnation by God for their evil.
Compelling thoughts! The ad hominem impugning of Conrad's intelligence/honesty combined with your remarkably astute observation that people who believe the same thing you do post things on the internet that you happen to agree with are all the proof necessary to set any thinking person right on this topic. Who could possibly refute such solid arguments for a complex and implausible conspiracy theory as you just put forward. Well don!
<eye-rolling incredulous sarcastic smiley goes here>
gilbertpaul: conrad, you are either a well decieved man or the biggest liar on the planet. I believe your a great liar though. There are more people finding without a doubt that 911 was an inside job but you just go on rattling your lies because many of us know better. ================================================================= Many sources of information are out there for all to see. Just go to Datehookup.com a free site and read the thread in the forum post," 911 the truth you don't know about 911 " by eagleeyes. Go to Alex Jones site, infowars.com, and go to Powerofprophecy.com or conspiracyworld.com. 911 was without doubt one of many acts of domestic terrorism perpetrated by the White House and the terrorist nation of Israel behind the scenes pulling the strings. And no God will not help us. No sir as a matter of fact God is going to punish America and Israel as well. And these two monsters are very deserving of all the damnation by God for their evil.
This is the current events and politics section the jokes and humor are a few doors over. But don't worry I needed the laughhappygolucky, Your a deceived and ignorant moron. You can laugh your way into hell but you can't laugh your way out you wicked child of the devil. So the jokes on you.
aspen12: IT SEEMS 50% OF PEOPLE POLLED ARE I GUESS BONEHEADS
at the very least! Probably more.
gardenhackle: Compelling thoughts! The ad hominem impugning of Conrad's intelligence/honesty combined with your remarkably astute observation that people who believe the same thing you do post things on the internet that you happen to agree with are all the proof necessary to set any thinking person right on this topic. Who could possibly refute such solid arguments for a complex and implausible conspiracy theory as you just put forward. Well don! <eye-rolling incredulous sarcastic smiley goes here>
Hey! You said something I agree with 100 percent. Whatever next!
Though poor Conrad is well able to defend himself with the ad hominem approach I think he needs help here.
gilbertpaul: Ralphy and TTom, I don't know what you think is so funny but your one of many brainwashed living dead to not know 911 was perpetrated by the traitors in Washington. ================================================================= Back in 1993 the FBI was found in court to have given the bomb and detonators to the Arabs on their first attempt at 911 back then. And in April of 1996 the FBI and the ATF committed that bombing in Oklahoma. The FBI also murdered at least 76 men, women and children in Waco based on false information. And lets bring up Ruby Ridge where an FBI marksman murdered Randy Weaver's wife as she held a baby in her hand. ================================================================= But yet you brain dead morons expect me to believe that our government doesn't commit terrorism against it's own people? Are you nuts? They have been doing it for years. All you have to do is check out the Gulf of Tonkin incident where McNamara and others lied about Vietnamese Fishermen firing on a American Patrol boat. Thus you had 3 million Vietnamese murdered by our military to boost the stock options for the share holders of the military industrial complex. ================================================================= And recently you have the phoney so called war in Iraq begun by a great lie by Bush, Rumsfeld and Chaney and sold to the American people via the stinking zionist news media. Hence the 1.4 million dead Iraqi's murdered on the alter of the White House's god of war, Satan himself. But you blind and dead could never figure this out could you? So keep right on laughing your evil is apparent.
Don't forget the treason committed by Karl Rove.....I'm still astonished that man isnt in jail.
Morris Fletcher: You guys are the Lone Gunmen, aren't you? You guys are my heroes. I mean look at the crap you print.
Byers: We uncover the truth.
Morris Fletcher: The truth? That's what's so great about you monkeys. Not only do you believe the horse pucky we create, you broadcast it as well. I mean look at this!
[headline reads: "Saddam testing mandroid army in Iraqi desert."]
Morris Fletcher: There is no Saddam Hussein. This guy's name is John Gillnitz, we found him doing dinner theatre in Tulsa. Did a mean "King and I." Plays good ethnics.
Ringo Langly: Are you trying to say that Saddam Hussein is a goverment plant?
Morris Fletcher: I'm saying I invented the guy. We set him up in '79. He rattles his saber whenever we need a good distraction. Ah... if you boys only knew how many of your stories I dreamed up while on the pot.
-The X-Files
Byers: We uncover the truth.
Morris Fletcher: The truth? That's what's so great about you monkeys. Not only do you believe the horse pucky we create, you broadcast it as well. I mean look at this!
[headline reads: "Saddam testing mandroid army in Iraqi desert."]
Morris Fletcher: There is no Saddam Hussein. This guy's name is John Gillnitz, we found him doing dinner theatre in Tulsa. Did a mean "King and I." Plays good ethnics.
Ringo Langly: Are you trying to say that Saddam Hussein is a goverment plant?
Morris Fletcher: I'm saying I invented the guy. We set him up in '79. He rattles his saber whenever we need a good distraction. Ah... if you boys only knew how many of your stories I dreamed up while on the pot.
-The X-Files
Trueblue, Yes they actually did. Before the attacks the security people and Bush's brother Marvin who served as a high ranking official for Securacom, which oversaw security at WTC and Dulles International Airport and United Airlines, were doing false fire drills and building engineers were planting bombs throughout all the support structures. ================================================================= Also conveniently the security camera's were cut off at the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. NORAD was told to stand down by Cheney while he was in charge at the White House thus you had no planes intercepted by our airforce even though the planes were in the air 72 minutes. Also an Israeli company had it's people warned before the attacks so they never showed up. It was Odigo. Furthermore An Israeli company was in charge for security at the terminals where the highjackings took place. The company is ICTS whose many employee's were formerly in the Israeli Defence Force or IDF. Can anyone refute this? I doubt it. The evidence is overwhelming.
gardenhackle: Looking at the poll numbers, one might draw the conclusion that half the people in this country believe 9/11 was an inside job.
# YES 46 46%
# NO 46 46%
# I COULDNT SAY 5 5%
# MAY BE 4 4%
But that would be an invalid conclusion. I suggest the numbers reflect the penchant nutcases have for sharing their insanity, causing an extremely high and very possibly 100% response rate while sane people were more likely to roll their eyes and blow off the the whole thing with no response at all, causing a very very low response rate.
The 9 out of 100 that booked "I couldn't say" or "may be" are the hardest to explain. They took the time to post a response but haven't been able to examine the entire theory and draw any conclusion about how likely or unlikely it may be.
I feel safer betting my life on the FACT that 9/11 had nothing whatsoever to do with US government conspiracy than I feel betting my life on the fact that brakes make a car slow down when you press on them. And I feel safe enough about that to bet my life on it for two hours a day every single workday and who knows how many hours on weekeends. So... yeah.... I won't embarrass myself by voting "could be" or "I don't know" even if I'm the only one that would know I'd cast a vote for such a vacuous position on the subject.
# YES 46 46%
# NO 46 46%
# I COULDNT SAY 5 5%
# MAY BE 4 4%
But that would be an invalid conclusion. I suggest the numbers reflect the penchant nutcases have for sharing their insanity, causing an extremely high and very possibly 100% response rate while sane people were more likely to roll their eyes and blow off the the whole thing with no response at all, causing a very very low response rate.
The 9 out of 100 that booked "I couldn't say" or "may be" are the hardest to explain. They took the time to post a response but haven't been able to examine the entire theory and draw any conclusion about how likely or unlikely it may be.
I feel safer betting my life on the FACT that 9/11 had nothing whatsoever to do with US government conspiracy than I feel betting my life on the fact that brakes make a car slow down when you press on them. And I feel safe enough about that to bet my life on it for two hours a day every single workday and who knows how many hours on weekeends. So... yeah.... I won't embarrass myself by voting "could be" or "I don't know" even if I'm the only one that would know I'd cast a vote for such a vacuous position on the subject.
gardenhackle: Looking at the poll numbers, one might draw the conclusion that half the people in this country believe 9/11 was an inside job.
# YES 46 46%
# NO 46 46%
# I COULDNT SAY 5 5%
# MAY BE 4 4%
But that would be an invalid conclusion. I suggest the numbers reflect the penchant nutcases have for sharing their insanity, causing an extremely high and very possibly 100% response rate while sane people were more likely to roll their eyes and blow off the the whole thing with no response at all, causing a very very low response rate.
The 9 out of 100 that booked "I couldn't say" or "may be" are the hardest to explain. They took the time to post a response but haven't been able to examine the entire theory and draw any conclusion about how likely or unlikely it may be.
I feel safer betting my life on the FACT that 9/11 had nothing whatsoever to do with US government conspiracy than I feel betting my life on the fact that brakes make a car slow down when you press on them. And I feel safe enough about that to bet my life on it for two hours a day every single workday and who knows how many hours on weekeends. So... yeah.... I won't embarrass myself by voting "could be" or "I don't know" even if I'm the only one that would know I'd cast a vote for such a vacuous position on the subject.
# YES 46 46%
# NO 46 46%
# I COULDNT SAY 5 5%
# MAY BE 4 4%
But that would be an invalid conclusion. I suggest the numbers reflect the penchant nutcases have for sharing their insanity, causing an extremely high and very possibly 100% response rate while sane people were more likely to roll their eyes and blow off the the whole thing with no response at all, causing a very very low response rate.
The 9 out of 100 that booked "I couldn't say" or "may be" are the hardest to explain. They took the time to post a response but haven't been able to examine the entire theory and draw any conclusion about how likely or unlikely it may be.
I feel safer betting my life on the FACT that 9/11 had nothing whatsoever to do with US government conspiracy than I feel betting my life on the fact that brakes make a car slow down when you press on them. And I feel safe enough about that to bet my life on it for two hours a day every single workday and who knows how many hours on weekeends. So... yeah.... I won't embarrass myself by voting "could be" or "I don't know" even if I'm the only one that would know I'd cast a vote for such a vacuous position on the subject.
SIMPLE ENOUGH JUST DONT VOTE WHO CARES
Happygolucky4u: This is the current events and politics section the jokes and humor are a few doors over. But don't worry I needed the laugh
GILBERT PAUL THANKS FOR YOUR INPUT DONT TRY TO CHANGE HIS MIND HE IS LIKE UNCLE ALBERT JUST COLD NO HEART JUST ALIVE
OMG this is rich!!!!!!
CHENEY: And the Pentagon crash -- we'll have to do it in broad daylight and say it was a plane, even though it'll really be a cruise missile.
BUSH: Wait, why do we have to use a missile?
CHENEY: Because it's much easier to shoot a missile and say it was a plane. It's not easy to steer a real passenger plane into the Pentagon. Planes are hard to come by.
BUSH: But aren't we using two planes for the Twin Towers?
CHENEY: Mr. President, you're missing the point. With the Pentagon, we use a missile, and say it was a plane.
BUSH: Right, but I'm saying, why don't we just use a plane and say it was a plane? We'll be doing that with the Twin Towers, right?
CHENEY: Right, but in this case, we use a missile. (Throws hands up in frustration) Don, can you help me out here?
RUMSFELD: Mr. President, in Washington, we use a missile because it's sneakier that way. Using an actual plane would be too obvious, even though we'll be doing just that in New York.
BUSH: Oh, OK.
RUMSFELD: The other good thing about saying that it was a passenger jet is that that way, we have to invent a few hundred fictional victims and account for a nonexistent missing crew and plane. It's always better when you leave more cover story to invent, more legwork to do and more possible holes to investigate. Doubt, legwork and possible exposure -- you can't pull off any good conspiracy without them.
CHENEY: And the Pentagon crash -- we'll have to do it in broad daylight and say it was a plane, even though it'll really be a cruise missile.
BUSH: Wait, why do we have to use a missile?
CHENEY: Because it's much easier to shoot a missile and say it was a plane. It's not easy to steer a real passenger plane into the Pentagon. Planes are hard to come by.
BUSH: But aren't we using two planes for the Twin Towers?
CHENEY: Mr. President, you're missing the point. With the Pentagon, we use a missile, and say it was a plane.
BUSH: Right, but I'm saying, why don't we just use a plane and say it was a plane? We'll be doing that with the Twin Towers, right?
CHENEY: Right, but in this case, we use a missile. (Throws hands up in frustration) Don, can you help me out here?
RUMSFELD: Mr. President, in Washington, we use a missile because it's sneakier that way. Using an actual plane would be too obvious, even though we'll be doing just that in New York.
BUSH: Oh, OK.
RUMSFELD: The other good thing about saying that it was a passenger jet is that that way, we have to invent a few hundred fictional victims and account for a nonexistent missing crew and plane. It's always better when you leave more cover story to invent, more legwork to do and more possible holes to investigate. Doubt, legwork and possible exposure -- you can't pull off any good conspiracy without them.
Albertaghost: OMG this is rich!!!!!!
CHENEY: And the Pentagon crash -- we'll have to do it in broad daylight and say it was a plane, even though it'll really be a cruise missile.
BUSH: Wait, why do we have to use a missile?
CHENEY: Because it's much easier to shoot a missile and say it was a plane. It's not easy to steer a real passenger plane into the Pentagon. Planes are hard to come by.
BUSH: But aren't we using two planes for the Twin Towers?
CHENEY: Mr. President, you're missing the point. With the Pentagon, we use a missile, and say it was a plane.
BUSH: Right, but I'm saying, why don't we just use a plane and say it was a plane? We'll be doing that with the Twin Towers, right?
CHENEY: Right, but in this case, we use a missile. (Throws hands up in frustration) Don, can you help me out here?
RUMSFELD: Mr. President, in Washington, we use a missile because it's sneakier that way. Using an actual plane would be too obvious, even though we'll be doing just that in New York.
BUSH: Oh, OK.
RUMSFELD: The other good thing about saying that it was a passenger jet is that that way, we have to invent a few hundred fictional victims and account for a nonexistent missing crew and plane. It's always better when you leave more cover story to invent, more legwork to do and more possible holes to investigate. Doubt, legwork and possible exposure -- you can't pull off any good conspiracy without them.
CHENEY: And the Pentagon crash -- we'll have to do it in broad daylight and say it was a plane, even though it'll really be a cruise missile.
BUSH: Wait, why do we have to use a missile?
CHENEY: Because it's much easier to shoot a missile and say it was a plane. It's not easy to steer a real passenger plane into the Pentagon. Planes are hard to come by.
BUSH: But aren't we using two planes for the Twin Towers?
CHENEY: Mr. President, you're missing the point. With the Pentagon, we use a missile, and say it was a plane.
BUSH: Right, but I'm saying, why don't we just use a plane and say it was a plane? We'll be doing that with the Twin Towers, right?
CHENEY: Right, but in this case, we use a missile. (Throws hands up in frustration) Don, can you help me out here?
RUMSFELD: Mr. President, in Washington, we use a missile because it's sneakier that way. Using an actual plane would be too obvious, even though we'll be doing just that in New York.
BUSH: Oh, OK.
RUMSFELD: The other good thing about saying that it was a passenger jet is that that way, we have to invent a few hundred fictional victims and account for a nonexistent missing crew and plane. It's always better when you leave more cover story to invent, more legwork to do and more possible holes to investigate. Doubt, legwork and possible exposure -- you can't pull off any good conspiracy without them.
-NOW UNCLE ALBERT IF YOU DONT HAVE SOMETHING INTELLIGENT TO SAY DONT SAY ANYTHING WE ARE TIRED OF THE SAME OLD BLA BLA BLA.....I WILL SAY YOU ARE A LIAR PROVE IT
aspen12: -NOW UNCLE ALBERT IF YOU DONT HAVE SOMETHING INTELLIGENT TO SAY DONT SAY ANYTHING WE ARE TIRED OF THE SAME OLD BLA BLA BLA.....I WILL SAY YOU ARE A LIAR PROVE IT
Pot calling kettle black!gilbertpaul: Trueblue, Yes they actually did. Before the attacks the security people and Bush's brother Marvin who served as a high ranking official for Securacom, which oversaw security at WTC and Dulles International Airport and United Airlines, were doing false fire drills and building engineers were planting bombs throughout all the support structures. ================================================================= Also conveniently the security camera's were cut off at the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. NORAD was told to stand down by Cheney while he was in charge at the White House thus you had no planes intercepted by our airforce even though the planes were in the air 72 minutes. Also an Israeli company had it's people warned before the attacks so they never showed up. It was Odigo. Furthermore An Israeli company was in charge for security at the terminals where the highjackings took place. The company is ICTS whose many employee's were formerly in the Israeli Defence Force or IDF. Can anyone refute this? I doubt it. The evidence is overwhelming.
Ddi you get all that out of the National Inquirer magazine ?
Or it a revelation after taking some hits off the bong ?
jvaski: Ddi you get all that out of the National Inquirer magazine ?
Or it a revelation after taking some hits off the bong ?
Or it a revelation after taking some hits off the bong ?
Fortean Times or Nexus anyone? javski, For starters get some clothes on even though we all know thats not your body but your head pasted onto someone elses body. And why would you falsely assume I smoke that crap your state wants to legalize if they haven't already? Why would you falsely ask if I got my information off that paper? ================================================================= Sounds to me that your the one with a problem because you can't handle the truth. So rather then face up to at least asking questions that can prove what i'm saying is right, you have to demonize me. Could be maybe your just happy to be told what to think by the government because you can't or won't reason for yourself? Huh junior? Is that it? ================================================================= I do alot of reading bozo and I've seen the truth years ago and unfortunately my fellow countrymen will not see the truth until the Federal Gestapo come a knocking on your door at 4:00 am to take you to a nice little FEMA concentration camp. Or didn't anyone tell you about the 700 newly built jails spread out all across America in different army bases, airport hangars or old railroad yards? Maybe you'll be the one who'll go peacefully thinking your going on some retreat. Wake up tarzan and put on some clothes!!!
gilbertpaul: javski, For starters get some clothes on even though we all know thats not your body but your head pasted onto someone elses body. And why would you falsely assume I smoke that crap your state wants to legalize if they haven't already? Why would you falsely ask if I got my information off that paper? ============================================ Sounds to me that your the one with a problem because you can't handle the truth. So rather then face up to at least asking questions that can prove what i'm saying is right, you have to demonize me. Could be maybe your just happy to be told what to think by the government because you can't or won't reason for yourself? Huh junior? Is that it? ======================================== I do alot of reading bozo and I've seen the truth years ago and unfortunately my fellow countrymen will not see the truth until the Federal Gestapo come a knocking on your door at 4:00 am to take you to a nice little FEMA concentration camp. Or didn't anyone tell you about the 700 newly built jails spread out all across America in different army bases, airport hangars or old railroad yards? Maybe you'll be the one who'll go peacefully thinking your going on some retreat. Wake up tarzan and put on some clothes!!!
and stop underlining until your Post gets off the page!
gilbertpaul: javski, For starters get some clothes on even though we all know thats not your body but your head pasted onto someone elses body. And why would you falsely assume I smoke that crap your state wants to legalize if they haven't already? Why would you falsely ask if I got my information off that paper? ================================================================= Sounds to me that your the one with a problem because you can't handle the truth. So rather then face up to at least asking questions that can prove what i'm saying is right, you have to demonize me. Could be maybe your just happy to be told what to think by the government because you can't or won't reason for yourself? Huh junior? Is that it? ================================================================= I do alot of reading bozo and I've seen the truth years ago and unfortunately my fellow countrymen will not see the truth until the Federal Gestapo come a knocking on your door at 4:00 am to take you to a nice little FEMA concentration camp. Or didn't anyone tell you about the 700 newly built jails spread out all across America in different army bases, airport hangars or old railroad yards? Maybe you'll be the one who'll go peacefully thinking your going on some retreat. Wake up tarzan and put on some clothes!!!
People are either afraid to admit, even to them self ,whats really going on around them, or they have some interest in it
I, Left Gatekeeper: Why the "9/11 Truth" movement makes the "Left Behind" sci-fi series read like Shakespeare
Your basic Reichstag fire scenario, logical enough so far. Except in this story, the Reichstag fire is an immensely complicated media hoax; the conspirators plot to topple the World Trade Center and pin a series of hijackings on a group of Sunni extremists with alleged ties to Al Qaeda. How do they topple the Trade Center? Well, they make use of NORAD's expertise in flying remote-control aircraft and actually fly two such remote-control aircraft into the Towers (in another version of the story, they conspire with Al Qaeda terrorists to actually hijack the planes), then pass the planes off as commercial jetliners in the media. But it isn't the plane crashes that topple the buildings, but bombs planted in the Towers that do the trick.
For good measure -- apparently to lend credence to the hijacking story -- they then fake another hijacking/crash in the Pentagon, where there actually is no plane crash at all but instead a hole created by a cruise missile attack, fired by a mysterious "white jet" that after the attack circles the White House for some time, inspiring the attention of Secret Service agents who point at it curiously from the ground (apparently these White House Secret Service agents were not in on the plot, although FBI agents on scene at Ground Zero and in Shanksville and elsewhere were).
Lastly, again apparently to lend weight to the whole hijacking cover story, they burn a big hole in the ground in Pennsylvania and claim that a jet went down there, crashed by a bunch of brave fictional civilians who fictionally storm the fictional plane cabin. The real-life wife of one of the fictional heroes, Lisa Beamer, then writes a convincingly self-serving paean/memoir to her dead husband, again lending tremendous verisimilitude to the hijacking story. These guys are good!
More at the Link!
More Threads
Heavy Bass In The PM
everything is changing
1830's Music
What I Lack In Vocabulary
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
rarotonga
How far is too far?
Reality Check
Nature
Icebergs Still Around
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
And Imagine,not one of the blithering Idiots leaked even a Syllable!
None of the 20-Odd-Thousand involved!