Hello there Daniela, both the truth and existence are not debatable to establish its universal meaning. In court and or our argument, there has to be a substantial and proof of both the truth and existence, otherwise it is all a lie. For instance, you can't say I don't exist to someone you are with and can physically touch you, and neither can you say to court, that is my truth without truly building up or producing the validity of your truth and proven by the court of law. While, soul is a very personal one. You can't impose or put a ruling on believing that there is or there is no soul. It is not contestable so to speak and there is no need to.
Where as Truth and Existence are to be proven and has to be verified. Subject to the ramifications of law specially if it establishes one's credibility.
Probably Harbal, and you are not the only one. As a matter of fact there is no requirement to believe and or feel the presence of a soul, it is an acquired personal belief. Try to read Shamanism, and or the topics that regard the presence of the higher Spirit, then you will be closer to understanding and or acquiring the insight should you want to dig deeper.
I do have a personal opinion as to what a soul means Harbal. When I feel the spirit around me and inside of me, it defines the very peaceful representation of my existence. You can't touch it nor can you see nor explain it. You just have to feel and trust that it is there with you. Like the first post said, it is very personal and no need to have it shared to anyone unless he or she is a part of you. I wrote a lot of poem representing the sacred existence of my being where it it can only be grasped by whom I share that connection.
Wiki has a very good definition which says: "The spiritual or immaterial part of a human being and or animal. Also regarded as immortal."
Conrad I can't believe they can't see the benefit of building the wall. Watch the of String and what kind logic these people have to fail to see the need of protecting us from these criminals.
It is amazing what people go through to have themselves protected and yet fail to understand the purpose of creating this wall. Yes...Like one poster said, it simply is not right to enter a country illegally. Period. The wall will serve as a deterrent that works.
Bill and John, both your posts are no doubt a very compelling reason to build this wall.
On Hannity's show of the parents of the victims, I can't wait to see how this moron Pelosi can justify her decision of not approving a wall. Like the post of Conrad, it is pathetic for her to allocate, one tenth of one percent on the total budget for our protection.
My question is that why on earth does she even bother to put up a fence on her house?
Somethin, thanks for asking that question. In fact, Janine Pirro has a very explosive presentation that drill deep into that question. Where have they gotten all that wealth when they started as a very poor politicians?
And yes to the 500 trillion question as well.
Corruption has always been the mark of politicians but the Clintons, at least in my estimation are the worst of them all.
Hi Nam, how terrible for a government to control its people like that. I would surely hope that in the near future, these people are free to do anything they want as long as it doesn't hurt other people. Much like us here in the US. I sure hope there will come a time when these people are free..
There is this poster from Canada who is so condescending about this wall and I am sure she must be having a very bad day every time she reads about the success of our beloved president.
I am going to drop my grand son to school so I can't be here to respond to you but I will be back as this is a very sensitive and outrageous issue for me.
Good morning Elle. Whether your report is correct or not for us here in the US, it is for a fact very ridiculous. Just like Z said, our sanctuary cities gets so much budget way over and above the budget that is given to the welfare recipients by monthly figures. They have free housing, free food, free cars and free healthcare. Now they are not asylum seekers per se, these are the people that are brought in by the religious group in their rescue program which is encouraged and financed by the Saudi Arabian government. Here is the thing, they finance and arrange for them to come here by plane loads, at least from Somalia alone there is three plane a day that is filled with these people. The thing is, as soon as they land in my country, then we pick up the tabs of their expenses, the tax payers money. Now check this out, the religious organizations that did all the operations from beginning to end would cash in an awful lot of money both from the Saudi Arabian governments and or other parties that are interested to cash in with the Sanctuary money budget. Of course, as you have already been aware, Trump has stopped this sanctuary bs.
Now if your point on this blog is to create fake news for the purpose of getting attention, then of course, outrage and retaliation is the best way to do that.
You commented on one of the blogs that people don't like good news for the same purpose. I beg to disagree. I love good news, the only thing about it is that we can just smile and be joyful about it and that is the end of the story. On the other side, being bad and outraged, then we try to attempt to find a solution of whatever that is bad and it takes a lot of bickering and or insane opinion blabbing.
So there you go. Fake or not on your post about these numbers, that is the fact in my country and of course, why not, it is a discrepancy issue between who is going to be given better care, our own people or those strangers that are from all over the world.
Check this out, if in fact two thirds of the world need all to be seeking asylum, guess what, the second and first world will soon all be flattened out to be just that.
May I add on the post of Conrad about the allocated budget for our safety and here is my thought. It is so pathetic that a person of her status doesn't understand the value of our safety.
She should make her house open to all these foreigners. No fence whatsoever. By the way why does she need a fence in her house again?
"The facts just don't support a wall, there is a huge difference between illegal entry and illegal immigrants, and the figures available show that by far the largest number are those who entered legally and then overstayed. Rather than spend 20 billion (trump's own number) on a wall that will keep taking huge resources to maintain, it would make sense to finance a better checking system, so that those who remain after their visa expires, are caught and then sent back to their original country. Facts also show that you are safer being with immigrants than the local population"
Dr. I concur with what you just said. This kind of mentality is truly something that don't benefit our interest.
online today!lindsyjones Blog Comments (11,670)
RE: What is a Soul?
Hello there Daniela, both the truth and existence are not debatable to establish its universal meaning. In court and or our argument, there has to be a substantial and proof of both the truth and existence, otherwise it is all a lie. For instance, you can't say I don't exist to someone you are with and can physically touch you, and neither can you say to court, that is my truth without truly building up or producing the validity of your truth and proven by the court of law. While, soul is a very personal one. You can't impose or put a ruling on believing that there is or there is no soul. It is not contestable so to speak and there is no need to.Where as Truth and Existence are to be proven and has to be verified. Subject to the ramifications of law specially if it establishes one's credibility.