I must be a fortune teller. According to Ann Coulter....liberals are seeking to bsn metaphors...."Loughlin's Logic"..... is a metaphor.
Ain't that something? Within several days of this tragic event....creative word usage in the United States is being being banned? Likely it is to stop any and all references to Loughlen from being used in public.
But just as interesting.....was when Major Hasan murdered a number of US Soldiers and a pregant woman...they did not ask for a Ban of methaphoric use then. Radical Muslim in the US heard saying or clicking our "Hasan is our Man." Liberals did not have a problem with that. That would have violated Muslims rights.
But up and along comes Loughlen....and metaphors need to be banned? If this is not a admission that Loughlien was left ideologue...I don't know what is!
We are not even toughing into the Free Press and Free Speech Constitutional issues here.
Simple sayings....have the very most emotional impact. The deepest impact... Don't they? Ask not what you can do for.........Lose lips sink Ships.......Mr. Gorboecva, tear down this wall..... with each of those your mind goes to a time, a place, a event.....and 1000s of words, emotions and feelings are generated.
And the Liberal and DEM writers are seeing a potential night mare here with Loughlin. I suggest that is why the effort was made to bring Palin into this. But also Liberal and DEMs have used this technique oh so very well in the past.
GWB the warmonger..... Bomb, Bomb, Bomb McCain.....
One mid road conservative was taking notes. The notes I was making was saying Liberal did not want a logical and civil debate....they wanted a emotional debate all filled with rhetoric and vitrol.
Well now they are getting some of their own making with Loughlin. And "Louglen Logic"....is going to go along ways....is my thinking.
A quote from Coulter piece:
"By blaming a mass killing on figures of speech, liberals sound as crazy as Loughlen with all his complaints about people's grammar."
Just toying with a new net term. You know how fast new terms get spread around the net. One day in one blog...the next week in a 100. A month later all over the net.
Media are comparing the coming Obama ulogy of the Tuscon tragedy to Lincoln's Gettysberg address. That it is a defining moment in his administration. I will put my like of the Civil war period aside for a moment to give thought on this.
Surely it is major moment in which he has to address a country that is grieving and hurting. With all the victims, being white, a moment were he can cross a racial divide like no other President in our history. Words of condolence from a black President to a white America is history in it self.
Likely this will not even touch his mind as he prepares and then gives this address. But media and many in the country have defined this as a administration of a black president leading a white country, or a ethnic diverse country.
President Obama has at this time, a very unique purpose and place in the country history to perform. He can with 30 minutes of eloquent and gracious speaking end the much of the racial divide of the country. Or at least show that all people can feel the lose of a 9 year old girl. Here thoughts of his own daughters have to touch his mind. The pain is no different.
When you listen to his words on this tragic event. Close your eyes and listen with your heart for a time. If you hear man's voice, that is neither white, black, yellow, brown, red or any other color in the human DNa. Then likely you are listening to a speaker as great as Abraham Lincoln. And your heart is as innocent as that 9 year old girl's is.
Every politician and political pundit in the country is speaking about Tucson......Palin could talk about the Sudan vote, but it might make a her a outcast to the politicsl debate stream in the country.
You would not Palin to seem out of place in the Country, Juan?
And supports more governments like the pure as the driven snow Karsai gov't in Afghanistan, the kind and tender loving Iran, and the calm and collected Hamas controlled GaZA government.....
IL that long time DEM governed state and home state of President Obama...just voted to increase their state income tax by 66%.
This in light of the pending deficit crunch in Springfield.
Daily....the new White House Chief of Staff ..and ..Emanuel the former White House Chief of staff both come from IL politics. The Chief of Staff plays a major role in budgetting and taxing.
He assembles the reports for the President to review....he has the Presient's ear so to speak when it come to numbers.
We might not have a fire breather in Chief of Staff position anymore.....but we do have a big spending DEM in the staff position that sees billions as just zeros and not the sweat of the American tax payer.
Though Daily is a man that can work with REP....he is still a former banker on the receiving end of the bailouts. And was not saying to them.
Had President Obama really wanted to mid road his administration, he had the prefect chance to do so with the Chief of Staff choice. He could have contacted Ron Paul for a recommendation of a leading Tea Party finance man. That would have made him as center-line down the road as possible. But he did not.
So the pull on the Obama administration still continue. To hold back or to spend? To go austerity and shut things down. Or spend and stimulate.
What ever the choice...it is going to made by the big spending process of the DEMs.
RE: jared loughner is a pothead
If wish to say so, Trish .....thanks for the honesty.