Did anyone show him to the med room? I usually am not this insulting to someone, because I try to respect everyones opinion, but you my fine sir, are a nutter. G'day.
Welcome to the asylum Connecting Singles. Meds are handed out on the hour 2 doors down on the left...Please join your fellow patients posters in the dayroom at the end of the all...
Welcome to the group...You are now one of us...Be afraid, very afraid...muahahaha
Yes, but the thing is, any number of factors can override the "deterrant threat".
We are living in a world where the precious resources such as oil, are diminishing at an every increasing rate. You see it now that muscle countries are jockeying for position for these resources. When push comes to shove, and when it's down to the nitty gritty last reserves, there will be actions taken to secure them. There isn't any country that is just going to lay by the side while their competitor scoops in for what is left.
A great example of a way a nuclear exchange could happen is simple miscommunication and misinturrpretation of intentions. A great movie that portrays this is an American film called "By Dawns Early Light". It's about an American - Soviet exchange that started simply by misinturrpreting one anothers actions and it escalated quicker and more intensely, with the end result being a nuclear exchange. Just because we live in the technology age, doesn't mean that we are immune from this. A great example of this in recent history is when the Soviet Union placed nuclear missles on a little island called Cuba in the 1960's. We were litterally a heartbeat away from a full blown nuclear exchange. Technology hasn't changed enough to prevent this type of miscommunication & misinturrpretation. We just got lucky that Kruschev "blinked" first. Had we landed Marines on that beach, the Soviets were under orders to launch their tactical nukes..Had that happened, a full strike response would have been the only answer that Kennedy could have given in response.
Personally, I don't have a problem with women that have children. The only thing I ask of them is that they delay me being part of their lives because, should something go wrong in the relationship, I don't want the kids to have to be part of the drama that can ensue from the fallout of a bad relationship.
In addition, I think women with kids are in a sense, better than those that dont (settle down those of you that don't have kids, and let me explain). I find them to be independantly stronger for the most part and not so much as emotionally dependant. Alot of times, single mothers have gone quite awhile without a meaningful relationship and have learned that life is what you make of it. They also seem to be for the most part, a little more selective (and they should be considering their child is potentially going to be involved as well) and it kinda gives me that "1 out of a million and she trusted me of all" type of feeling. Now, that being said, I will shy away from a single mother that instantly wants to make me daddy, because that isn't fair to me, and it isn't fair to the child should things not work out.
I have to give this an absolute yes. If both parties can feasably make it happen, then I don't see why not. Love is something that is in short supply in this world and something that should not be taken for granted nor should it be something that is left to wonder. I know for a fact, if I found someone that I truly loved after and we had been together (physically) for some time, I'd move in a heartbeat. There is no dream in this life that even compares to being finally with the one that you know you will love for all time.
I'm a firm believer that love knows no boundries...HOWEVER (good lord there is always a however with my posts) I think both people involved in the relationship must make an extra effort to really determine if this is what both want and if that is what they both truly desire. It's a monumental decision, one I've never had to make, and maybe that's why it's so easy for me to say yes, but I do feel that there has to be some sort of way for them to see one another on a consistant basis to really establish the relationship as something that is and can be built on love.
I don't see anything wrong with it. From past experience, I've seen many people that were in either solid relationships or even married stay in the forums.
Alot of us have formed friendships that we'd like to continue while others enjoy just the daily life of the forums. I personally don't see anything wrong with it in the least.
I think it's something you should possibly (and I stress possibly) discuss with your signifigant other, if it is something that is taxing on your concience and you feel as though you are hiding something or it could be percieved by your signifigant other as you hiding something, that way it is out on the table.
To be honest, I have to say that age has nothing to do with how someone acts. There are those that are older (both men & women) that are selfish & asses, but there are nice ones..The same can be said for the younger (both men & women).
It's more about the individual, than about a particular group. Sure we have all had different life experiences where we have had both positive & negative experiences, but to label any particular group simply on these experiences is just wrong. That being said, that is how we shape our lives, on experiences and it is often harder than not, to look at a particular group outside of what we have had experiences with.
JSuburbia Forum Posts (2,518)
RE: Why 911 was staged, from a sociological psychological point
Was down that way, just had noway to say hi to anyone i know down there..lol..Thanks alot.