Raise your hand if you played a Beatles song backwards...

I was in 7th grade when my father bought a Wollensak reel-to-reel tape recorder. It used 1/4" tape and normally played mono recordings. A mechanical control on the head allowed the user to convert it to stereo by connecting an add-on speaker box. Wattage was low and everything had tube circuitry.
These machines were built solid, probably 40 pounds, so much the school board used them in Audio Visual presentations.
Me, my dad and my brother all took turns using this tape recorder. My brother used to record single songs from 45's and make a 'party mix' for his friends. I recorded my rock band rehearsals for evaluation and my dad often recorded audio tracks from TV shows.

The way 1/4" recording tape is designed, you had 4 spaces for record/playback. 2 channel stereo used tracks 1 and 3. When the tape ended, you could flip the reels and play back the other side that was adjusted for tracks 2 and 4. There was enough separation that the head would only play the intended tracks. Since there was a stereo/mono switch, if you played a stereo recording in mono, there was a really good chance the 'cross talk' of the other tracks would come through the playback... in reverse.
Eventually something that sounded like: Moisuah, ska chipp chip dursennn ya bolumaga snit bosha, would come from the speakers.

In the world of Beatlemania, it was said The Beatles had recorded cryptic clues about the untimely death of Paul McCartney and his identical look-alike replacement, Billy Shears. In order to hear the messages, you needed to hear the record played backwards!
Piece of cake... right? Just break out the Wollensak and record the song, flip the tape, move the playback head to stereo and adjust the alignment to catch the opposite track running backwards.

"Turn me on dead man... Turn me on dead man.."

Embedded image from another site


That Wollensak was in my shed for more than 20 years. When I tried to use it, all the belts and rubber wheels had gummed out and rotted. Unless, you needed a really cool door stop, It was useless to keep it around.

I read the other day that many years later, McCartney publicity acknowledged the stunt about his passing was totally frabricated.
Post Comment

Comments (5)

Since McCartney is still here, what else could it be ? laugh
or, who else could it be?

Billy Shears laugh
No. McCartney had a unique voice. Musically, that was the best thing about the band.
They weren't talented musicians. It was McCartney and later their lyrics improved.

Lennon and McCartney had totally different voices with different ranges, Lennon being deeper with more British accent. Over the years both of their voices and styles changed.

I've been listening to The Beatles Channel on satellite radio for the past few weeks and they do some recording outtakes where you can hear them laughing when something goes wrong and they have to start over.

Here's an older live recording where Lennon's early deeper style was apparent.

I read the other day that many years later, McCartney publicity acknowledged the stunt about his passing was totally frabricated.

Glad that was just a rumor. Paul was the cutest. cool
Post Comment - Let others know what you think about this Blog.
Meet the Author of this Blog
chatilliononline today!

chatillion

Boca Raton, Florida, USA

I have an amazing ability to sniff-out bogus profiles...
If you're half my age... Don't expect a response! [read more]

About this Blog

created Aug 2020
455 Views
Last Viewed: Apr 16
Last Commented: Aug 2020
Last Edited: Aug 2020
chatillion has 1,880 other Blogs

Like this Blog?

Do you like this Blog? Why not let the Author know. Click the button to like the Blog. And your like will be added. Likes are anonymous.

Feeling Creative?