mRNA, DNA Changes, NanoMedicine and MIT
Yes, mRNA can change DNA, and Tal Zaks of Moderna, one of the makers of a version of the Jab, discusses it.
Moderna Chief Medical Officer Admits mRNA Alters DNA
Several prominent physicians, doctors, Sons of Liberty Media Health and Wellness expert Kate Shemirani, her colleague Dr. Kevin Corbett, and I have postulated that the current experimental mRNA injection for coronavirus, aka COVID-19, could alter one’s genetic code or DNA. Bill Gates stated it, which was included in my video “Human Genome 8 and mRNA Vaccine” on Brighteon.com. It is one reason the term “experimental human genome altering mRNA injection” has been used to describe the jab being foisted onto the mostly unsuspecting public. While many in the media, Dr. Anthony Fauci and his merry band of chronic liars, and “fact checkers” have declared this claim as false, a video of a TEDx Beacon Street talk by Tal Zaks, chief medical officer of Moderna, Inc., one pharmaceutical company manufacturer of the experimental mRNA technology injection, confirms mRNA injection for COVID-19 can change your genetic code or DNA. This TEDx Beacon Street talk occurred in 2017. H/T to YouTube channel Silview Media Backup Channel.
(In legal terms, these would be considered an Admission of a Party Opponent or Statement Against Interest).
Zaks calls it “hacking the software of life”. In the first minute of the video Zaks states, “we’ve been living this phenomenal digital scientific revolution, and I’m here today to tell you, that we are actually hacking the software of life, and that it’s changing the way we think about prevention and treatment of disease.” [Emphasis mine.] He even repeats that they (Moderna) think of it like an operating system, which the Moderna website indicates as “Our Operating System”.
Zaks mentions the new technology of Nano-Medicine, being worked on at MIT at MM 7m40s.
See also:
Could mRNA vaccines permanently alter DNA? Recent science suggests they might
Research on SARS-CoV-2 RNA by scientists at Harvard and MIT has implications for how mRNA vaccines could permanently alter genomic DNA, according to Doug Corrigan, Ph.D., a biochemist-molecular biologist who says more research is needed.
But Leftist professionally-lying "fact-checkers" who don't want you to listen to the likes of Dr. Corrigan, post hit pieces on him: Doug Corrigan pushing bad science and anti-vax tropes about mRNA vaccines
Buuuu-uutt... call themselves "Skeptical Raptor" and hide their own identity, referring to themselves in the third person.
Sorry. You don't get to throw rocks from the shadows and be considered on the same playing field as the ones who show their bona fides.
Dr. Corrigan gives his reasons for speaking out here:
(The Shut-up and take your Jab Types) just used superficially simplistic biology 101 as a smoke screen to tell you that RNA doesn’t convert into DNA. This is utterly disingenuous, and this lack of candor is what motivated me to write my original article.
“SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome.” bioRxiv (2020). PDF
Comments (8)
Hey is there a dna alteration to remove sadness?
Can you let me know when the mRNA for that is in?
Thanks in advance.
Oh don't worry I just want to keep it in my cupboard for a rainy day.
Or maybe sell it on ebay.
By the way Bo, it's starting to get too late to save us you know...age
50plus most of us... majorety had at last one dna alteration by now and all.
But thanks for caring.
There was so much pertinent info that I can not use only a few excerpts or paraphrase any of it.
Don't let the hyena discourage you.
"So, why didn’t they discover this, or even ask this question, or even do some experiments to rule it out? Instead, they just used superficially simplistic biology 101 as a smoke screen to tell you that RNA doesn’t convert into DNA. This is utterly disingenuous, and this lack of candor is what motivated me to write my original article. They could have figured this out easily.
Second, there’s a big difference between the scenario where people randomly, and unwittingly, have their genetics monkeyed with because they were exposed to the coronavirus, and the scenario where we willfully vaccinate billions of people while telling them this isn’t happening.
Wouldn’t you agree?
What is the logic in saying, “Well, this bad thing may or may not happen to you, so we’re going to remove the mystery and ensure that it happens to everyone.”?
In my best estimate, this is an ethical decision that you ought to make, not them."
...
Evidence shows that the Spike Protein was engineered, or man-modified, using gain-of-function. Shi Zhengli, also known as “The Bat Woman”, is the Director of the Centre for Emergence of Infectious Disease and Biosafety at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Zhengli herself confirms, “… re-engineered HKU4 spike, aiming to build its capacity to mediate viral entry into human cells,” and “to this end, we introduced two single mutations…mutations in these motifs in coronavirus spikes have demonstrated dramatic effects on viral entry into human cells.”
Dr. Richard Fleming has conducted extensive scientific and forensic research into SARS-CoV-2 / Covid-19 and states:
“The key to proving and understanding [SARS-CoV-2 as a] bioweapon is its spike protein. The very same spike protein now being made in millions of people after the Covid vaccines are injected into them. These vaccines are nothing more than the genetic code of this bioweapon.”
Dr. Fleming’s research shows that the Spike Protein was engineering to include mechanisms which create “an inflammothrombotic response, with mRNA reverse transcription into cell DNA…”
Look up "mRNA" and "reverse transcription."
The authors aren't saying that it happens every time, but that there ought to be a helluva lot more study on what this technology does to humans before mass-Jabbing them.