PALIN for Presdient ? ( Archived) (97)

I agree but, would it not be possible for her to be running against Hilary Clinton. It is a proven fact that women can acheive more things at the same time and make progress. Women are better at muti tasking. You have to admit we are in the dark ages as there are woman rulers all over the world. Take Margaret Thatcher. Now one was just voted in, in a eastern country.[can't remember which country] last week. It is the men who are against a women in office and will put down a woman and demean her for anything if she is running for office. Not caring if she has a good chance of sucsess and improvement of our countries problems are solved or not. Then you complain because no one is solving anything. But the Clintons are two people who in their ways of great intelligence can and could do something positive. Forget any scandel and mistress'. All presidents had them and Pres.Taft had five. Clinton left office with the budget in the black which every one forgets.Hillary was to tackle a health program in '94 but was shot down by the government as trying to act like a president. We would have had a health plan by now if they had let her go for it.That only proves thatthe government does not want a health plan and pay for one.Don't You think?? 16 year s laterand no one really cares. Obama put one out there just to say he did. Most politicians have not even read it,or want to. If any one find faults with either, Palin or Hillary you then have to admit, they are where they are because of their knowlege, wisdom anfd focus. They are two very powerful women who gets things done.

We are the much less just sitting here playing computor talk.

What would be so bad as trying a woman President as it could be no worse as some Presidents who are known for doing nothing.