Tolerance and Intolerance... ( Archived) (96)

serene56: Yet more intolerance from the self-proclaimed tolerant guy

serene56: Well-balanced eh Chip on both shoulders

Conrad73: The precept: “Judge not, that ye be not judged” . . . is an abdication of moral responsibility: it is a moral blank check one gives to others in exchange for a moral blank check one expects for oneself.

There is no escape from the fact that men have to make choices; so long as men have to make choices, there is no escape from moral values; so long as moral values are at stake, no moral neutrality is possible. To abstain from condemning a torturer, is to become an accessory to the torture and murder of his victims.

The moral principle to adopt in this issue, is: “Judge, and be prepared to be judged.”

The opposite of moral neutrality is not a blind, arbitrary, self-righteous condemnation of any idea, action or person that does not fit one’s mood, one’s memorized slogans or one’s snap judgment of the moment. Indiscriminate tolerance and indiscriminate condemnation are not two opposites: they are two variants of the same evasion. To declare that “everybody is white” or “everybody is black” or “everybody is neither white nor black, but gray,” is not a moral judgment, but an escape from the responsibility of moral judgment.

To judge means: to evaluate a given concrete by reference to an abstract principle or standard. It is not an easy task; it is not a task that can be performed automatically by one’s feelings, “instincts” or hunches. It is a task that requires the most precise, the most exacting, the most ruthlessly objective and rational process of thought. It is fairly easy to grasp abstract moral principles; it can be very difficult to apply them to a given situation, particularly when it involves the moral character of another person. When one pronounces moral judgment, whether in praise or in blame, one must be prepared to answer “Why?” and to prove one’s case—to oneself and to any rational inquirer.
“How Does One Lead a Rational Life in an Irrational Society,”
The Virtue of Selfishness, 72

RAND

postneoludite: If ya ain't with us, yer agin us

Conrad73: there is bit of a difference between disagreeing,and bashing in someone's Skull!
Und Willst Du Nicht Mein Bruder Sein,Dann Hau Ich Dir Den Schaedel Ein!
(If you don't want to be my Brother,I'll bash in your Skull. trans.)

Foreign Politics through the Ages.http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Crusades