'Tis no surprise at least we meet I've known you nigh forever. And gentle candor so discrete Has been my life endeavor. Down countless random nameless trails In life did we meander Or did a course our ships did sail To something so much grander? Free will, perhaps, or was it fate? To crash the party, though invited? To luck upon a perfect mate Or two souls reunited?
Hi, gardenhackle, Even though And gentle candor so discrete Has been my life endeavor conveys an underlying intent, whether it be luck or destiny, love remains a marvelous mystery. I continue to ponder the line, To crash the party, though invited? Thank you for sharing.
Why, thank you all very much for the kind comments. Yes, "gentle candor so discrete" does have underlying meaning. Juxtaposition of utter and tender openness with varied and sundry semantic connotations of gentlemanly discretion and capacity for decisive choice all wrapped into the one line and, perhaps just the one word.
To crash the party, though invited. Yes, it is part of the greater conundrum. The meaning is obviously hidden. I love applying oxymora that taken in the right context actually are not.
agoodguy2have. A perceptive and astute question it is that you asked, and the only possible answer to the question, given the poem's content, is in the third line.
Comments (7)
Even though And gentle candor so discrete Has been my life endeavor conveys an underlying intent, whether it be luck or destiny, love remains a marvelous mystery. I continue to ponder the line, To crash the party, though invited? Thank you for sharing.
a person as a perfect mate? some people
seem to think so...
Yes, "gentle candor so discrete" does have underlying meaning. Juxtaposition of utter and tender openness with varied and sundry semantic connotations of gentlemanly discretion and capacity for decisive choice all wrapped into the one line and, perhaps just the one word.
To crash the party, though invited. Yes, it is part of the greater conundrum. The meaning is obviously hidden. I love applying oxymora that taken in the right context actually are not.