Obama keeps his important promise and begining pulling out troops from Afghanistan as promised. (701)
Ccincy: I love to tease dude and I hope he knows by now I'm only doing so in fun.
Hot_Single_Dude: What the freak is wrong with people behaving this low agaisnt fellow human beings?http://www.yumasun.com/news/stephenson-71014-ahcccs-heart.html
Sounds alittle like the Obamacare doesn't it?
Ccincy: I love to tease dude and I hope he knows by now I'm only doing so in fun.
You are a ture lady Cciny 
Ccincy: I watched him one time yrs ago and could not stomach him.
I understand for sure... 
Hot_Single_Dude: You are a ture lady Cciny
Thank you dude.
got to leave! May the force be with you all 
Hot_Single_Dude: I understand for sure...
Most of the tv avangelists are a bunch of rich crooks away.
Hot_Single_Dude: What the freak is wrong with people behaving this low agaisnt fellow human beings?
I've been wondering that for a very long time Stevie.
Why don't you explain to us?
Hot_Single_Dude: Thank you Thank you Thank you Raphael... because you told Katt EXACTLY what I had in mind to tell her but was not able to because of my rather poor english skills... This post of urs was absolutely a Bulls Eye and EXACTLY what Katt should think a bout and trying to answer
Gosh! I feel god reading ur post
Gosh! I feel god reading ur post
Dude, your bigotry is just a click away, right below your picture on these threads for all to see. Likewise for SB.
As for your English, I'm sure it is much better than your Danish.
What group advocated the following:
"We ask the government undertake with the obligation above all providing for citizens with adequate opportunity for employment and making a living. The activities of the individual must not clash with the interest of the community, but must take place within the confine of it and be for the good of all. Therefore we demand a end of to the power of financial interest. We demand profit sharing in big business. We demand a broad extension of the care for the aged. We demand...the greatest possible consideration of small business in the purchases of national, state and municipal government. In order to to make possible to every capable and industrious (citizen) the attainment of a higher education and those achieve a post of leadership, the government must provide from a all-around enlargement of our entire system of public education. We demand the education at the government expense of our gifted children of poor parents. The government must undertake the improvement of the public health-by protecting mother and child, by prohibiting child labor---by the greatest support of for all clubs concerned with the physical education of youth. We combat the materialist spirit within and without us, and convinced that the recovery of our people can only proceed from within on the foundation of the common good before the individual good."
No fair using quote checking sites.
Answer in a few days.
"We ask the government undertake with the obligation above all providing for citizens with adequate opportunity for employment and making a living. The activities of the individual must not clash with the interest of the community, but must take place within the confine of it and be for the good of all. Therefore we demand a end of to the power of financial interest. We demand profit sharing in big business. We demand a broad extension of the care for the aged. We demand...the greatest possible consideration of small business in the purchases of national, state and municipal government. In order to to make possible to every capable and industrious (citizen) the attainment of a higher education and those achieve a post of leadership, the government must provide from a all-around enlargement of our entire system of public education. We demand the education at the government expense of our gifted children of poor parents. The government must undertake the improvement of the public health-by protecting mother and child, by prohibiting child labor---by the greatest support of for all clubs concerned with the physical education of youth. We combat the materialist spirit within and without us, and convinced that the recovery of our people can only proceed from within on the foundation of the common good before the individual good."
No fair using quote checking sites.
Answer in a few days.
raphael118: You have a bad habit of knowingly slandering me despite my repeated efforts to give you personal information. Your U6 numbers are nebulous and due to the economic evils your beloved party dumped on us. Your slander and great hostility, your constant attempts to emphasize and report? any rule violation and then to publicly complain about it makes me wonder if that sick , vicous, prolific troll is still VERY ACTIVE.
You love to denigrate people here who are not in relationships-
very weird since this is a singles site . So why are you here? Why is your mate here? Why are you both unwilling to display your pictures?
You love to denigrate people here who are not in relationships-
very weird since this is a singles site . So why are you here? Why is your mate here? Why are you both unwilling to display your pictures?
The U6 numbers are provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, The Obama Administration's Bureau of Labor Statistics.
You were aware that in 1994 the Clinton Administration and the BLS changed the way unemployment was calculated weren't you? Suddenly many people that were considered unemployed were no longer counted as part of the workforce.
As they were no longer part of the workforce, they were no longer unemployed. Three cheers for slick Willy!!
They still didn't have jobs but they were not unemployed. They couldn't afford bread so let them eat cake sez king William.
U6 more effectively show true unemployment. U3 lowers the number of people theoretically in the labor pool to give the appearance of a lower unemployment rate (numbers don't lie, liars use numbers). If you have a problem with the way they work the numbers for U6 please forward your concerns to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Washington DC. Attn. Barry.
I have no problem with people not in relationships. I have a problem with people who are always looking outside themselves for excuses for their own failings (Bush made me lose my job, Illegal aliens make me drink too much, Muslims ate my hat, etc.)
Rose and I are here to see the show. A friend showed us the site when we were visiting him a couple of years ago and the forums were like a car wreck, we just couldn't look away.
We don't post pictures because we don't want to. Both of us have been stalked in the past. Invisible is good when you've been through that.
We don't want abusive jerks screaming at us in Wally World over something posted here and we don't want our peace disturbed by phone, email or in person should someone manage to track us down.
I think I've seen a few of the other NH people in a mall or at some event but I don't speak to them if I do. They might like their privacy too.
ttom500: What group advocated the following:
"We ask the government undertake with the obligation above all providing for citizens with adequate opportunity for employment and making a living. The activities of the individual must not clash with the interest of the community, but must take place within the confine of it and be for the good of all. Therefore we demand a end of to the power of financial interest. We demand profit sharing in big business. We demand a broad extension of the care for the aged. We demand...the greatest possible consideration of small business in the purchases of national, state and municipal government. In order to to make possible to every capable and industrious (citizen) the attainment of a higher education and those achieve a post of leadership, the government must provide from a all-around enlargement of our entire system of public education. We demand the education at the government expense of our gifted children of poor parents. The government must undertake the improvement of the public health-by protecting mother and child, by prohibiting child labor---by the greatest support of for all clubs concerned with the physical education of youth. We combat the materialist spirit within and without us, and convinced that the recovery of our people can only proceed from within on the foundation of the common good before the individual good."
No fair using quote checking sites.
Answer in a few days.
"We ask the government undertake with the obligation above all providing for citizens with adequate opportunity for employment and making a living. The activities of the individual must not clash with the interest of the community, but must take place within the confine of it and be for the good of all. Therefore we demand a end of to the power of financial interest. We demand profit sharing in big business. We demand a broad extension of the care for the aged. We demand...the greatest possible consideration of small business in the purchases of national, state and municipal government. In order to to make possible to every capable and industrious (citizen) the attainment of a higher education and those achieve a post of leadership, the government must provide from a all-around enlargement of our entire system of public education. We demand the education at the government expense of our gifted children of poor parents. The government must undertake the improvement of the public health-by protecting mother and child, by prohibiting child labor---by the greatest support of for all clubs concerned with the physical education of youth. We combat the materialist spirit within and without us, and convinced that the recovery of our people can only proceed from within on the foundation of the common good before the individual good."
No fair using quote checking sites.
Answer in a few days.
Such pretty words!
I'm guessing this was the Beta version of the plan and the final version was not quite so nice.
raphael118: You have a bad habit of knowingly slandering me despite my repeated efforts to give you personal information. Your U6 numbers are nebulous and due to the economic evils your beloved party dumped on us. Your slander and great hostility, your constant attempts to emphasize and report? any rule violation and then to publicly complain about it makes me wonder if that sick , vicous, prolific troll is still VERY ACTIVE.
You love to denigrate people here who are not in relationships-
very weird since this is a singles site . So why are you here? Why is your mate here? Why are you both unwilling to display your pictures?
You love to denigrate people here who are not in relationships-
very weird since this is a singles site . So why are you here? Why is your mate here? Why are you both unwilling to display your pictures?
raphael118 Not taking sides between you and the Katts but I'd like to know why does it bother you so much of why both Katta don't choose to put up a picture of themselves? I don't recall while reading the rules of this site stating/requiring that somone must post a pic of themselves.If the mods don't have a problem with it why do you.
What does them both or anyone not posting a pic which by the way is that persons choice to or to have to do with the topic of this thread.Don't they still have a right to your opinions regardless.
If I were to take my pic down would you still talk to me if you and I were discussing a topic on here?
Ccincy: raphael118 Not taking sides between you and the Katts but I'd like to know why does it bother you so much of why both Katta don't choose to put up a picture of themselves? I don't recall while reading the rules of this site stating/requiring that somone must post a pic of themselves.If the mods don't have a problem with it why do you.
What does them both or anyone not posting a pic which by the way is that persons choice to or to have to do with the topic of this thread.Don't they still have a right to your opinions regardless.
If I were to take my pic down would you still talk to me if you and I were discussing a topic on here?
What does them both or anyone not posting a pic which by the way is that persons choice to or to have to do with the topic of this thread.Don't they still have a right to your opinions regardless.
If I were to take my pic down would you still talk to me if you and I were discussing a topic on here?
I meant their opinions not the word your.
Ive been on here for 2 years - why cant i get a pretty little stalker!
katt1017: Such pretty words!
I'm guessing this was the Beta version of the plan and the final version was not quite so nice.
I'm guessing this was the Beta version of the plan and the final version was not quite so nice.
You are good Katt............shhhhhhhh for now
............House rejects approval of Libyan operations, but does not vote to defund
.
.By Chris Moody
Political Reporter
.PostsEmail .By Chris Moody | The Ticket – Fri, Jun 24, 2011
The House of Representatives on Friday rejected a resolution endorsing limited military operations in Libya, but fell short of cutting off funds for U.S. military action in the region.
The measures were largely symbolic--but showed a growing rift between Congress and the White House on presidential war powers, even within President Obama's own party. Seventy-two Democrats joined the Republican majority to kill the resolution approving of the operations. During the second vote, 89 Republicans voted to continue the war funding.
This is the first time in 12 years that Congress has not voted to support a national military operation. The last instance was in 1999, when the House voted 213-213 on a resolution that would have approved of Bill Clinton's military action in Kosovo.
The first vote poses a dilemma for congressional Democrats, some of whom believe the White House failed to consult Congress before initiating force against Libya. Within the caucus, the debate raged: Support the president, or take a stand for the chamber and send a clear message to Obama that demands him to consult Congress first.
In preparation for today's set of resolutions, the Obama administration scrambled to keep the level of embarrassment to a minimum. The White House sent Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to meet with Democratic House members Thursday night, and White House officials spent the evening contacting Democratic members of Congress to sway their votes, Politico reported.
Some Democrats who supported the resolution to endorse the military operations said they considered the Republican effort to restrict funds a cheap political stunt. Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA), the ranking member on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, accused the GOP of "toying with national security."
"The majority is bringing up this resolution in order to embarrass the White House," Berman said on the House floor before the first vote. "They know it will fail. They want to continue to play games with U.S. national security. Let's be honest about what's happening here."
The operation in Libya has tepid support among the public: Just 39 percent of respondents to a recent Gallup poll said they support the nation's involvement in Libya while 46 percent disprove.
..
.
.By Chris Moody
Political Reporter
.PostsEmail .By Chris Moody | The Ticket – Fri, Jun 24, 2011
The House of Representatives on Friday rejected a resolution endorsing limited military operations in Libya, but fell short of cutting off funds for U.S. military action in the region.
The measures were largely symbolic--but showed a growing rift between Congress and the White House on presidential war powers, even within President Obama's own party. Seventy-two Democrats joined the Republican majority to kill the resolution approving of the operations. During the second vote, 89 Republicans voted to continue the war funding.
This is the first time in 12 years that Congress has not voted to support a national military operation. The last instance was in 1999, when the House voted 213-213 on a resolution that would have approved of Bill Clinton's military action in Kosovo.
The first vote poses a dilemma for congressional Democrats, some of whom believe the White House failed to consult Congress before initiating force against Libya. Within the caucus, the debate raged: Support the president, or take a stand for the chamber and send a clear message to Obama that demands him to consult Congress first.
In preparation for today's set of resolutions, the Obama administration scrambled to keep the level of embarrassment to a minimum. The White House sent Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to meet with Democratic House members Thursday night, and White House officials spent the evening contacting Democratic members of Congress to sway their votes, Politico reported.
Some Democrats who supported the resolution to endorse the military operations said they considered the Republican effort to restrict funds a cheap political stunt. Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA), the ranking member on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, accused the GOP of "toying with national security."
"The majority is bringing up this resolution in order to embarrass the White House," Berman said on the House floor before the first vote. "They know it will fail. They want to continue to play games with U.S. national security. Let's be honest about what's happening here."
The operation in Libya has tepid support among the public: Just 39 percent of respondents to a recent Gallup poll said they support the nation's involvement in Libya while 46 percent disprove.
..
katt1017: The U6 numbers are provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, The Obama Administration's Bureau of Labor Statistics.
You were aware that in 1994 the Clinton Administration and the BLS changed the way unemployment was calculated weren't you? Suddenly many people that were considered unemployed were no longer counted as part of the workforce.
As they were no longer part of the workforce, they were no longer unemployed. Three cheers for slick Willy!!
They still didn't have jobs but they were not unemployed. They couldn't afford bread so let them eat cake sez king William.
U6 more effectively show true unemployment. U3 lowers the number of people theoretically in the labor pool to give the appearance of a lower unemployment rate (numbers don't lie, liars use numbers). If you have a problem with the way they work the numbers for U6 please forward your concerns to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Washington DC. Attn. Barry.
I have no problem with people not in relationships. I have a problem with people who are always looking outside themselves for excuses for their own failings (Bush made me lose my job, Illegal aliens make me drink too much, Muslims ate my hat, etc.)
Rose and I are here to see the show. A friend showed us the site when we were visiting him a couple of years ago and the forums were like a car wreck, we just couldn't look away.
We don't post pictures because we don't want to. Both of us have been stalked in the past. Invisible is good when you've been through that.
We don't want abusive jerks screaming at us in Wally World over something posted here and we don't want our peace disturbed by phone, email or in person should someone manage to track us down.
I think I've seen a few of the other NH people in a mall or at some event but I don't speak to them if I do. They might like their privacy too.
You were aware that in 1994 the Clinton Administration and the BLS changed the way unemployment was calculated weren't you? Suddenly many people that were considered unemployed were no longer counted as part of the workforce.
As they were no longer part of the workforce, they were no longer unemployed. Three cheers for slick Willy!!
They still didn't have jobs but they were not unemployed. They couldn't afford bread so let them eat cake sez king William.
U6 more effectively show true unemployment. U3 lowers the number of people theoretically in the labor pool to give the appearance of a lower unemployment rate (numbers don't lie, liars use numbers). If you have a problem with the way they work the numbers for U6 please forward your concerns to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Washington DC. Attn. Barry.
I have no problem with people not in relationships. I have a problem with people who are always looking outside themselves for excuses for their own failings (Bush made me lose my job, Illegal aliens make me drink too much, Muslims ate my hat, etc.)
Rose and I are here to see the show. A friend showed us the site when we were visiting him a couple of years ago and the forums were like a car wreck, we just couldn't look away.
We don't post pictures because we don't want to. Both of us have been stalked in the past. Invisible is good when you've been through that.
We don't want abusive jerks screaming at us in Wally World over something posted here and we don't want our peace disturbed by phone, email or in person should someone manage to track us down.
I think I've seen a few of the other NH people in a mall or at some event but I don't speak to them if I do. They might like their privacy too.
" Numbers dont lie, liars use numbers" .......are you calling yourself a liar now?!!!!! "the truth will out"!!!!
UNEMPLOYMENT BUSH'S FIRST YEAR ABOUT 4.5%
UNEMPLOYMENT SIX MONTHS INTO OBAMA'S FIRST YEAR ABOUT 10%
BUSH USED THE SAME ACCOUNTING METHOD AS CLINTON!!!!
U6 UNEMPLOYMENT BUSH'S FIRST YEAR ABOUT 7.5%
U6 UNEMPLOYMENT SIX MONTHS INTO OBAMA'S FIRST YEAR ABOUT 17%!!!
THE REPUBLICAN CATASTROPHE IS THE SAME EITHER WAY!!!!!!
UNEMPLOYMENT SOARED LIKE A ROCKET AT THE START OF THE REPUBLICAN'S GREAT RECESSION.
WHEN PEOPLE ARE SUFFERING IN THIS COUNTRY THE REPUBLICAN ATTEMPTS TO LIE AND DECEIVE ARE SICKENING!!!!!!!
raphael118: " Numbers dont lie, liars use numbers" .......are you calling yourself a liar now?!!!!! "the truth will out"!!!!
UNEMPLOYMENT BUSH'S FIRST YEAR ABOUT 4.5%
UNEMPLOYMENT SIX MONTHS INTO OBAMA'S FIRST YEAR ABOUT 10%BUSH USED THE SAME ACCOUNTING METHOD AS CLINTON!!!!
U6 UNEMPLOYMENT BUSH'S FIRST YEAR ABOUT 7.5%
U6 UNEMPLOYMENT SIX MONTHS INTO OBAMA'S FIRST YEAR ABOUT 17%!!!
THE REPUBLICAN CATASTROPHE IS THE SAME EITHER WAY!!!!!!
UNEMPLOYMENT SOARED LIKE A ROCKET AT THE START OF THE REPUBLICAN'S GREAT RECESSION.
WHEN PEOPLE ARE SUFFERING IN THIS COUNTRY THE REPUBLICAN ATTEMPTS TO LIE AND DECEIVE ARE SICKENING!!!!!!!
UNEMPLOYMENT BUSH'S FIRST YEAR ABOUT 4.5%
UNEMPLOYMENT SIX MONTHS INTO OBAMA'S FIRST YEAR ABOUT 10%BUSH USED THE SAME ACCOUNTING METHOD AS CLINTON!!!!
U6 UNEMPLOYMENT BUSH'S FIRST YEAR ABOUT 7.5%
U6 UNEMPLOYMENT SIX MONTHS INTO OBAMA'S FIRST YEAR ABOUT 17%!!!
THE REPUBLICAN CATASTROPHE IS THE SAME EITHER WAY!!!!!!
UNEMPLOYMENT SOARED LIKE A ROCKET AT THE START OF THE REPUBLICAN'S GREAT RECESSION.
WHEN PEOPLE ARE SUFFERING IN THIS COUNTRY THE REPUBLICAN ATTEMPTS TO LIE AND DECEIVE ARE SICKENING!!!!!!!
Our agitator is getting agitated!
Think happy thoughts Riffy, like a nice grove of silver birches.
While you do that I'll call nurse Ratched to "help" you.
I'm glad you have a nurse. Unless shes thinking of a back rub I'll let her give you more meds. I like your admirer a few posts above, I bet you all have a lot in common !!!!! 
(no i'm not talking about your lesbian lifestyle)
(no i'm not talking about your lesbian lifestyle)
raphael118: I'm glad you have a nurse. Unless shes thinking of a back rub I'll let her give you more meds. I like your admirer a few posts above, I bet you all have a lot in common !!!!! (no i'm not talking about your lesbian lifestyle)
I hope you're not referring to me cause I'm not an admirer of anyone on here.
I only come for a laugh regarding politics etc.raphael118: I'm glad you have a nurse. Unless shes thinking of a back rub I'll let her give you more meds. I like your admirer a few posts above, I bet you all have a lot in common !!!!! (no i'm not talking about your lesbian lifestyle)
More homophobia Riffy?
Something to speculate on re: unemployment rates:
The seasonally-adjusted SGS Alternate Unemployment Rate reflects current unemployment reporting methodology adjusted for SGS-estimated long-term discouraged workers, who were defined out of official existence in 1994. That estimate is added to the BLS estimate of U-6 unemployment, which includes short-term discouraged workers.
The U-3 unemployment rate is the monthly headline number. The U-6 unemployment rate is the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) broadest unemployment measure, including short-term discouraged and other marginally-attached workers as well as those forced to work part-time because they cannot find full-time employment.
Enjoy!
The seasonally-adjusted SGS Alternate Unemployment Rate reflects current unemployment reporting methodology adjusted for SGS-estimated long-term discouraged workers, who were defined out of official existence in 1994. That estimate is added to the BLS estimate of U-6 unemployment, which includes short-term discouraged workers.
The U-3 unemployment rate is the monthly headline number. The U-6 unemployment rate is the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) broadest unemployment measure, including short-term discouraged and other marginally-attached workers as well as those forced to work part-time because they cannot find full-time employment.
Enjoy!
katt1017: Something to speculate on re: unemployment rates:
The seasonally-adjusted SGS Alternate Unemployment Rate reflects current unemployment reporting methodology adjusted for SGS-estimated long-term discouraged workers, who were defined out of official existence in 1994. That estimate is added to the BLS estimate of U-6 unemployment, which includes short-term discouraged workers.
The U-3 unemployment rate is the monthly headline number. The U-6 unemployment rate is the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) broadest unemployment measure, including short-term discouraged and other marginally-attached workers as well as those forced to work part-time because they cannot find full-time employment.
Enjoy!
The seasonally-adjusted SGS Alternate Unemployment Rate reflects current unemployment reporting methodology adjusted for SGS-estimated long-term discouraged workers, who were defined out of official existence in 1994. That estimate is added to the BLS estimate of U-6 unemployment, which includes short-term discouraged workers.
The U-3 unemployment rate is the monthly headline number. The U-6 unemployment rate is the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) broadest unemployment measure, including short-term discouraged and other marginally-attached workers as well as those forced to work part-time because they cannot find full-time employment.
Enjoy!
enjoy? only a republican would. your graphs clearly show exactly what i said about unemployment rates and how the republican's great recession under GWB created this disaster that finally peaked out about six months in Obama's presidency .
I want to thank you Katt for having the courage to admit the truth of claims.
katt1017: Something to speculate on re: unemployment rates:
The seasonally-adjusted SGS Alternate Unemployment Rate reflects current unemployment reporting methodology adjusted for SGS-estimated long-term discouraged workers, who were defined out of official existence in 1994. That estimate is added to the BLS estimate of U-6 unemployment, which includes short-term discouraged workers.
The U-3 unemployment rate is the monthly headline number. The U-6 unemployment rate is the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) broadest unemployment measure, including short-term discouraged and other marginally-attached workers as well as those forced to work part-time because they cannot find full-time employment.
Enjoy!
The seasonally-adjusted SGS Alternate Unemployment Rate reflects current unemployment reporting methodology adjusted for SGS-estimated long-term discouraged workers, who were defined out of official existence in 1994. That estimate is added to the BLS estimate of U-6 unemployment, which includes short-term discouraged workers.
The U-3 unemployment rate is the monthly headline number. The U-6 unemployment rate is the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) broadest unemployment measure, including short-term discouraged and other marginally-attached workers as well as those forced to work part-time because they cannot find full-time employment.
Enjoy!
enjoy? only a republican would. your graphs clearly show exactly what i said about unemployment rates and how the republican's great recession under GWB created this disaster that finally peaked out about six months in Obama's presidency .
I want to thank you Katt for having the courage to admit the truth of my claims.
katt1017: More homophobia Riffy?
I mentioned that about your lifestyle (thank goodness!) because you love to claim homophobia and homophobic insinuation ever chance you get in order to bully and intimidate.
Ccincy: I hope you're not referring to me cause I'm not an admirer of anyone on here. I only come for a laugh regarding politics etc.
no i was referring to someone else. you'll always be zinger free
Ccincy!
raphael118: I mentioned that about your lifestyle (thank goodness!) because you love to claim homophobia and homophobic insinuation ever chance you get in order to bully and intimidate.
Hardehardehardeharharhar!raphael118: enjoy? only a republican would. your graphs clearly show exactly what i said about unemployment rates and how the republican's great recession under GWB created this disaster that finally peaked out about six months in Obama's presidency .I want to thank you Katt for having the courage to admit the truth of my claims.
More like 16% considering the Pieces you dropped!More Threads
rarotonga
Sleepy Don!
The Best of the GOP
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
1830's Music
How far is too far?
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
other can see but not you
your personality
Common Issues with the BMW X1
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Bankname and Address!